Multicriteria approach to assess the fire behaviour of polymers in electrochemical energy storage

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105541
Benedetta A. De Liso, Gianmaria Pio, Ernesto Salzano
{"title":"Multicriteria approach to assess the fire behaviour of polymers in electrochemical energy storage","authors":"Benedetta A. De Liso,&nbsp;Gianmaria Pio,&nbsp;Ernesto Salzano","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An innovative and multicriteria procedure based on the experimental characterization of solid materials exposed to fire was developed in this work. The validity and potentialities of this approach were tested for the evaluation of polymeric materials of potential use in electrochemical energy storage systems. To this aim, different experimental techniques, including thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and cone calorimetry, were implemented to quantify fundamental-based key performance indicators (KPIs) accounting for environmental (e.g., toxicity), ignitability, and flame characteristics. The developed approach enabled us to thoroughly examine the implications of key variables, including sample thickness, thermal flux, and composition. Considering the analyzed scale, the flexibility in boundary conditions, and the variety of collected data, the use of bench-scale equipment such as the cone calorimeter is recommended for the implementation of the proposed procedure. Based on the combination of collected data an overall ranking in terms of sustainability was obtained, showing that PVC is the least-performing material among the ones investigated. Therefore, the presented methodology can be also intended as a powerful tool for the comparison of final products and materials, paving the way for a more informed decision-making process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 105541"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024002997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An innovative and multicriteria procedure based on the experimental characterization of solid materials exposed to fire was developed in this work. The validity and potentialities of this approach were tested for the evaluation of polymeric materials of potential use in electrochemical energy storage systems. To this aim, different experimental techniques, including thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and cone calorimetry, were implemented to quantify fundamental-based key performance indicators (KPIs) accounting for environmental (e.g., toxicity), ignitability, and flame characteristics. The developed approach enabled us to thoroughly examine the implications of key variables, including sample thickness, thermal flux, and composition. Considering the analyzed scale, the flexibility in boundary conditions, and the variety of collected data, the use of bench-scale equipment such as the cone calorimeter is recommended for the implementation of the proposed procedure. Based on the combination of collected data an overall ranking in terms of sustainability was obtained, showing that PVC is the least-performing material among the ones investigated. Therefore, the presented methodology can be also intended as a powerful tool for the comparison of final products and materials, paving the way for a more informed decision-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Explosion hazards and mechanisms of hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure Acid-base synergetic effect and thermal risk assessment on homogeneous catalytic production of γ-valerolactone with formic acid Experimental study on ignition and flame propagation of hydrogen/carbon black hybrid mixtures in a vertical tube Systematic literature review on the risk assessment of ammonia refrigeration systems in the food industry Risk evaluation of submarine pipelines using improved FMEA model based on social network analysis and extended GLDS method under a linguistic Z-number preference relation environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1