Calibration and sensitivity analysis of under-expanded hydrogen jet CFD simulation based on surrogate modeling

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105535
Xiaoyang Luan , Bin Zhang , Michael Short , Tao Chen
{"title":"Calibration and sensitivity analysis of under-expanded hydrogen jet CFD simulation based on surrogate modeling","authors":"Xiaoyang Luan ,&nbsp;Bin Zhang ,&nbsp;Michael Short ,&nbsp;Tao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accidental leaks from high-pressure hydrogen storage containers can lead to under-expanded jet flows, posing risks of fires or explosions. Practitioners traditionally harness Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to assess the hazards of such hydrogen releases. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, often chosen by their efficiency and reliability and significantly influences CFD results. However, the closure coefficients within RANS harbor uncertainties. These coefficients, often defaulting to values ascertained from foundational flow experiments, may not generalize across diverse flow contexts, especially for intricate flow challenges like under-expanded hydrogen jets with high velocities and pressures. This study employs surrogate modelling to recalibrate these closure coefficients for CFD simulations of under-expanded hydrogen jets. Sensitivity analysis with Sobol indices quantifies their impact. The recalibration resulted in significantly improved accuracy, compared to their default values, of the CFD against literature reported experimental data. The results can enhance safety assessments and measures for hydrogen applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 105535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024002936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accidental leaks from high-pressure hydrogen storage containers can lead to under-expanded jet flows, posing risks of fires or explosions. Practitioners traditionally harness Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to assess the hazards of such hydrogen releases. The Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, often chosen by their efficiency and reliability and significantly influences CFD results. However, the closure coefficients within RANS harbor uncertainties. These coefficients, often defaulting to values ascertained from foundational flow experiments, may not generalize across diverse flow contexts, especially for intricate flow challenges like under-expanded hydrogen jets with high velocities and pressures. This study employs surrogate modelling to recalibrate these closure coefficients for CFD simulations of under-expanded hydrogen jets. Sensitivity analysis with Sobol indices quantifies their impact. The recalibration resulted in significantly improved accuracy, compared to their default values, of the CFD against literature reported experimental data. The results can enhance safety assessments and measures for hydrogen applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于代理建模的欠膨胀氢射流CFD模拟标定及灵敏度分析
高压储氢容器的意外泄漏可能导致射流膨胀不足,造成火灾或爆炸的风险。传统上,从业者利用计算流体动力学(CFD)软件来评估这种氢释放的危害。reynolds - average Navier-Stokes (RANS)方程通常根据其效率和可靠性来选择,并对CFD结果产生重大影响。然而,RANS内的关闭系数存在不确定性。这些系数通常默认为从基础流动实验中确定的值,可能无法在不同的流动环境中推广,特别是对于复杂的流动挑战,如高速和高压的欠膨胀氢射流。本研究采用替代模型来重新校准这些闭合系数,用于欠膨胀氢射流的CFD模拟。用Sobol指数进行敏感性分析,量化其影响。与文献报道的实验数据相比,重新校准的结果显著提高了CFD的精度。研究结果可以加强氢应用的安全评价和措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
How to conduct integrated risk assessment for chemical industrial park cyber-physical system: risk identification, limitations analysis, and future perspectives Research on the theoretical model of gas explosion loads at arbitrary ignition positions in confined spaces Flammability regimes of ionic liquids: Modelling thermal decomposition and flash point Mechanism-based identification of hidden accident precursors in runaway butadiene polymerization Proactive decision-making agent for industrial leakage and explosion emergencies powered by Physics_GNN and LLM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1