A marginal effect approach to analyzing the contingent effects of perceived political instability and informal competition on the relationship between foreign technologies and product innovation

Samuel Amponsah Odei , Fazal Ur Rehman , Michael Karikari Appiah
{"title":"A marginal effect approach to analyzing the contingent effects of perceived political instability and informal competition on the relationship between foreign technologies and product innovation","authors":"Samuel Amponsah Odei ,&nbsp;Fazal Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Michael Karikari Appiah","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper empirically examines how foreign technologies impact firms' product innovation; specifically, we consider the moderating effects of perceived political instability and informal competition. This study uses the strategy tripod view theory to develop a novel theoretical model to explain how perceived political instability and informal competition impact the relationship between foreign technologies and product innovation. Our empirical model, which is based on survey and national-level data from thousands of firms across several emerging markets, shows that (i) low levels of perceived political instability and increased foreign technologies marginally increase the chances of introducing new products or services. (ii) Low levels of informal competition and high levels of foreign technologies marginally increase product innovation. (iii) High levels of perceived political instability and informal competition marginally reduce the likelihood of product innovation. (iv) The interaction between perceived political instability, informal competition, and foreign technologies marginally increases firms’ product innovation. Other results reveal the significance of firm characteristics, activities, and managerial experiences. Some implications for practice, policy, and theory are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 30-45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209624872400047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper empirically examines how foreign technologies impact firms' product innovation; specifically, we consider the moderating effects of perceived political instability and informal competition. This study uses the strategy tripod view theory to develop a novel theoretical model to explain how perceived political instability and informal competition impact the relationship between foreign technologies and product innovation. Our empirical model, which is based on survey and national-level data from thousands of firms across several emerging markets, shows that (i) low levels of perceived political instability and increased foreign technologies marginally increase the chances of introducing new products or services. (ii) Low levels of informal competition and high levels of foreign technologies marginally increase product innovation. (iii) High levels of perceived political instability and informal competition marginally reduce the likelihood of product innovation. (iv) The interaction between perceived political instability, informal competition, and foreign technologies marginally increases firms’ product innovation. Other results reveal the significance of firm characteristics, activities, and managerial experiences. Some implications for practice, policy, and theory are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Business model innovation as a mediator between construction 4.0 and firm performance: Evidence from Turkish construction companies Digitalization, innovation, sustainability and performance: A causal analysis applied to tourism MSMEs Achieving social innovation in the digital age: A case study of microbusiness A marginal effect approach to analyzing the contingent effects of perceived political instability and informal competition on the relationship between foreign technologies and product innovation Trust creation as a factor for the solidarity of government, business, and society in regional innovation development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1