Effects of 24-weeks in-field use of a back-supporting exoskeleton on biomechanics, work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort: A randomized controlled trial among logistic workers

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104469
L. Schrøder Jakobsen , A. Samani , K. Desbrosses , M. de Zee , B. Steinhilber , P. Madeleine
{"title":"Effects of 24-weeks in-field use of a back-supporting exoskeleton on biomechanics, work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort: A randomized controlled trial among logistic workers","authors":"L. Schrøder Jakobsen ,&nbsp;A. Samani ,&nbsp;K. Desbrosses ,&nbsp;M. de Zee ,&nbsp;B. Steinhilber ,&nbsp;P. Madeleine","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The trial investigated the impact of a back-supporting exoskeleton (BSE) on biomechanics, work intensity, and musculoskeletal discomfort among logistic-workers over 24-weeks in a field-setting. Twenty workers were randomized into intervention and control groups, performing daily order-picking with and without the BSE, respectively. Effects on muscles activity and kinematics were measured during standardized tasks before and after the intervention period, while work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort were rated throughout the intervention period. The results indicated significant reductions in back muscle activity during lifting tasks with BSE assistance before and after 24-weeks. Although three BSE users stopped using the exoskeleton during the intervention period, the remaining workers progressively increased their daily BSE use associated with an overall decrease in perceived work intensity throughout the 24-weeks. The trial suggests that the effect of the BSE on back muscle activity remains constant over 24-weeks, opposite what was hypothesized based on previous research on training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trial investigated the impact of a back-supporting exoskeleton (BSE) on biomechanics, work intensity, and musculoskeletal discomfort among logistic-workers over 24-weeks in a field-setting. Twenty workers were randomized into intervention and control groups, performing daily order-picking with and without the BSE, respectively. Effects on muscles activity and kinematics were measured during standardized tasks before and after the intervention period, while work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort were rated throughout the intervention period. The results indicated significant reductions in back muscle activity during lifting tasks with BSE assistance before and after 24-weeks. Although three BSE users stopped using the exoskeleton during the intervention period, the remaining workers progressively increased their daily BSE use associated with an overall decrease in perceived work intensity throughout the 24-weeks. The trial suggests that the effect of the BSE on back muscle activity remains constant over 24-weeks, opposite what was hypothesized based on previous research on training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
24周现场使用背支撑外骨骼对生物力学、工作强度和肌肉骨骼不适的影响:物流工人的随机对照试验
在为期24周的现场环境中,该试验调查了背部支撑外骨骼(BSE)对后勤工人生物力学、工作强度和肌肉骨骼不适的影响。20名工人被随机分为干预组和对照组,分别在有和没有疯牛病的情况下进行日常拣货。在干预期前后的标准化任务中测量了对肌肉活动和运动学的影响,而在整个干预期对工作强度和肌肉骨骼不适进行了评估。结果表明,在24周前后,在BSE辅助下的举重任务中,背部肌肉活动显著减少。虽然有3名疯牛病患者在干预期间停止使用外骨骼,但其余的工人在24周内逐渐增加了他们的日常疯牛病使用,同时感知工作强度总体下降。该试验表明,疯牛病对背部肌肉活动的影响在24周内保持不变,这与之前基于训练研究的假设相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Eyes on the mission: Mixed methods assessment of eye-tracker-enabled interactive decision support in a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle system Guilty until proven innocent: Experiencing errors in training promotes relationship equity and trust calibration Medication adherence among older adults: Current practices and prospects for AI integration Evaluating the accuracy and feasibility of a commercial AI-powered ergonomic assessment system for automotive assembly work Perceived safety during human-robot interaction with an autonomous mobile robot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1