Developing and validating a Chinese human-automation trust scale: Advancing trust measurement of emerging automation in sustainable ergonomics

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104477
Zixin Cui , Xiangling Zhuang , Seul Chan Lee , Jieun Lee , Xintong Li , Makoto Itoh
{"title":"Developing and validating a Chinese human-automation trust scale: Advancing trust measurement of emerging automation in sustainable ergonomics","authors":"Zixin Cui ,&nbsp;Xiangling Zhuang ,&nbsp;Seul Chan Lee ,&nbsp;Jieun Lee ,&nbsp;Xintong Li ,&nbsp;Makoto Itoh","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Measuring humans’ learned trust in emerging automation systems across different trust development stages is important for fostering a sustainable and human-centered human-automation interaction. Given the notable differences in human-automation trust between Chinese culture and other cultures, particularly Western cultures, the development of an effective measurement tool for human-automation trust within Chinese cultural context is indispensable. This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the Human-Automation Trust Scale (C-HATS) with reasonable reliability and validity, based on several existing theories and scales related to human-automation trust. Following three phases of assessments, including exploratory factor analysis, item analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis, the scale demonstrated reasonable reliability and validity for both initial and post-task trust assessments. However, certain items of our C-HATS should be separately applied when assessing initial and post-task trust. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge the structural differences between initial and post-task trust. Post-task trust consists of three factors: performance, process, and purpose-based trust, whereas initial trust consists of only two dimensions: cognition-based and affect-based trust. These distinctions should be considered when evaluating the subfacets of initial and post-task trust. Although further validation is required, the developed C-HATS has the potential to assess initial and post-task human-automation trust within Chinese cultural context across various automation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring humans’ learned trust in emerging automation systems across different trust development stages is important for fostering a sustainable and human-centered human-automation interaction. Given the notable differences in human-automation trust between Chinese culture and other cultures, particularly Western cultures, the development of an effective measurement tool for human-automation trust within Chinese cultural context is indispensable. This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the Human-Automation Trust Scale (C-HATS) with reasonable reliability and validity, based on several existing theories and scales related to human-automation trust. Following three phases of assessments, including exploratory factor analysis, item analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis, the scale demonstrated reasonable reliability and validity for both initial and post-task trust assessments. However, certain items of our C-HATS should be separately applied when assessing initial and post-task trust. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge the structural differences between initial and post-task trust. Post-task trust consists of three factors: performance, process, and purpose-based trust, whereas initial trust consists of only two dimensions: cognition-based and affect-based trust. These distinctions should be considered when evaluating the subfacets of initial and post-task trust. Although further validation is required, the developed C-HATS has the potential to assess initial and post-task human-automation trust within Chinese cultural context across various automation systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Developing and validating a Chinese human-automation trust scale: Advancing trust measurement of emerging automation in sustainable ergonomics Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Preemptive Tilting Seats in mitigating Carsickness Muscle coactivation changes following a fatiguing overhead drilling task: Implications for subacromial impingement syndrome Quantitative team performance metrics for dismounted infantry battle drill analysis Proof of concept of a cobotic system in a constrained work environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1