Quantitative team performance metrics for dismounted infantry battle drill analysis

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104473
Clifford L. Hancock , Grace W. Teo , Michael J. King , Gregory A. Goodwin , Kenneth P. Pitts , Megan E. Coyne , Donald N. Varieur , William F. Harris , Meghan P. O'Donovan
{"title":"Quantitative team performance metrics for dismounted infantry battle drill analysis","authors":"Clifford L. Hancock ,&nbsp;Grace W. Teo ,&nbsp;Michael J. King ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Goodwin ,&nbsp;Kenneth P. Pitts ,&nbsp;Megan E. Coyne ,&nbsp;Donald N. Varieur ,&nbsp;William F. Harris ,&nbsp;Meghan P. O'Donovan","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Performance optimization down to the small unit level in the military is critical to the success of the collective force during an operation. However, there remains a lack of objective, quantitative performance metrics to evaluate military-team performance during battle drill training. Our research identified multiple wearable-derived measures that could predict squad performance as aligned to specific battle drill performance constructs. We developed linear mixed-effects models for three critical performance constructs: 1) Communications, 2) Fire Effectiveness, and 3) Violence of Action. In these three models, measures based on inertial measurement unit (IMU), Global Positioning System (GPS), heart rate, and transcribed communication performance metrics significantly explained 51.5%–63.5% of the variance in squad performance. A future after-action review (AAR) system could integrate wearable-derived performance metrics to provide squads with quantitative assessments that supplement feedback communicated by observer-controllers and impart new, beneficial insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance optimization down to the small unit level in the military is critical to the success of the collective force during an operation. However, there remains a lack of objective, quantitative performance metrics to evaluate military-team performance during battle drill training. Our research identified multiple wearable-derived measures that could predict squad performance as aligned to specific battle drill performance constructs. We developed linear mixed-effects models for three critical performance constructs: 1) Communications, 2) Fire Effectiveness, and 3) Violence of Action. In these three models, measures based on inertial measurement unit (IMU), Global Positioning System (GPS), heart rate, and transcribed communication performance metrics significantly explained 51.5%–63.5% of the variance in squad performance. A future after-action review (AAR) system could integrate wearable-derived performance metrics to provide squads with quantitative assessments that supplement feedback communicated by observer-controllers and impart new, beneficial insights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下马步兵作战演练分析的定量团队绩效指标
在军事行动中,小单位级别的性能优化对集体力量的成功至关重要。然而,仍然缺乏客观的、定量的性能指标来评估军事小组在战斗训练中的表现。我们的研究确定了多种可穿戴设备衍生的测量方法,可以预测与特定战斗训练性能结构相一致的小队性能。我们开发了三个关键性能结构的线性混合效应模型:1)通信,2)火力有效性和3)行动暴力。在这三个模型中,基于惯性测量单元(IMU)、全球定位系统(GPS)、心率和转录通信性能指标的测量显著解释了小队表现差异的51.5%-63.5%。未来的行动后评估(AAR)系统可以整合可穿戴设备衍生的性能指标,为小队提供定量评估,补充观察员-控制者之间的反馈,并提供新的、有益的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Eyes on the mission: Mixed methods assessment of eye-tracker-enabled interactive decision support in a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle system Guilty until proven innocent: Experiencing errors in training promotes relationship equity and trust calibration Medication adherence among older adults: Current practices and prospects for AI integration Evaluating the accuracy and feasibility of a commercial AI-powered ergonomic assessment system for automotive assembly work Perceived safety during human-robot interaction with an autonomous mobile robot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1