Neck pain and text neck using Hill's criteria of causation: A scoping review

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.016
Paula Auxiliadora Resende , Igor Macedo Tavares Correia , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Ney Meziat-Filho , Luciana Crepaldi Lunkes
{"title":"Neck pain and text neck using Hill's criteria of causation: A scoping review","authors":"Paula Auxiliadora Resende ,&nbsp;Igor Macedo Tavares Correia ,&nbsp;Arthur de Sá Ferreira ,&nbsp;Ney Meziat-Filho ,&nbsp;Luciana Crepaldi Lunkes","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Technological advances make mobile devices (smartphones, tablets) increasingly part of individuals' routines. The most diverse functionalities can prolong the use of these devices for hours, which instigates discussions about possible musculoskeletal consequences and their association with neck pain.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To describe the current state of concepts involving text neck and neck pain using Hill's criteria of causation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Scoping review of the literature conducted in the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Articles published until August/2023 were analyzed based on the title and abstract and subsequently by general content. Then, causality verification applying Hill's criteria was carried out by two independent reviewers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>21 articles were included. The majority of studies (90%) had an observational design, with the total sample having a mean age of 24 ± 6,32 years. None of Hill's criteria of causation were met by any of the selected articles, with no causal association being evident.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The causal association between text neck and neck pain is not supported by current literature based on the evaluation of Hill's criteria, widely used in epidemiology to establish causal links.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 132-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Technological advances make mobile devices (smartphones, tablets) increasingly part of individuals' routines. The most diverse functionalities can prolong the use of these devices for hours, which instigates discussions about possible musculoskeletal consequences and their association with neck pain.

Aim

To describe the current state of concepts involving text neck and neck pain using Hill's criteria of causation.

Methods

Scoping review of the literature conducted in the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Articles published until August/2023 were analyzed based on the title and abstract and subsequently by general content. Then, causality verification applying Hill's criteria was carried out by two independent reviewers.

Results

21 articles were included. The majority of studies (90%) had an observational design, with the total sample having a mean age of 24 ± 6,32 years. None of Hill's criteria of causation were met by any of the selected articles, with no causal association being evident.

Conclusion

The causal association between text neck and neck pain is not supported by current literature based on the evaluation of Hill's criteria, widely used in epidemiology to establish causal links.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部疼痛和短信颈使用希尔的因果标准:范围审查
技术进步使得移动设备(智能手机、平板电脑)越来越多地成为个人日常生活的一部分。最多样化的功能可以延长这些设备的使用时间数小时,这引发了关于可能的肌肉骨骼后果及其与颈部疼痛的关系的讨论。目的用希尔因果标准描述文本颈痛和颈痛相关概念的现状。方法在EMBASE、MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane Library和CINAHL数据库中进行文献综述。在2023年8月之前发表的文章根据标题和摘要进行分析,随后根据一般内容进行分析。然后,由两位独立的审稿人应用Hill标准进行因果关系验证。结果共纳入21篇文献。大多数研究(90%)采用观察设计,总样本的平均年龄为24±6.32岁。希尔的因果关系标准没有一个被任何选定的文章所满足,没有明显的因果关系。结论基于流行病学中广泛使用的Hill标准评价,文本颈与颈部疼痛之间的因果关系尚不为现有文献所支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding dry needling to physical therapy for chronic neck pain in upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome Is there a relationship between kinesiophobia and the functional capacity of women with knee osteoarthritis? Wearable technologies in neurorehabilitation and cardiac rehabilitation: A narrative review Leveraging technology-based interventions with varying levels of immersion for the assessment of low back pain: a scoping review Factors associated with chronic low back pain and central sensitization in office workers: a multidimensional analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1