Effects of an artificial intelligence-based exercise program on pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain compared with group exercise therapy: A cohort study

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.02.018
Griefahn Annika , Hartmann Rica , Avermann Florian , Zalpour Christoff , Luedtke Kerstin
{"title":"Effects of an artificial intelligence-based exercise program on pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain compared with group exercise therapy: A cohort study","authors":"Griefahn Annika ,&nbsp;Hartmann Rica ,&nbsp;Avermann Florian ,&nbsp;Zalpour Christoff ,&nbsp;Luedtke Kerstin","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study compares the effects of an artificial intelligence app-based exercise program with group exercise therapy on pain intensity and neck-related disability in patients with neck pain.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>84 patients with neck pain. 70 fulfilled the study requirements. 52 were in the intervention and 18 in the comparison group.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>The intervention group utilized an AI-based exercise program accessible via digital devices. The AI provided 3–5 daily exercises tailored to individual feedback, pain intensity, and well-being. The exercise duration was up to 15 min per day. The comparison group attended up to two 45-min group exercise sessions weekly.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pain intensity and neck-related disability were assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale and the Neck Disability Index via online questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test was used to test for between group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 8 weeks, the intervention group showed a significantly lower pain intensity than the comparison group (U = 287, Z = −2.447, p = 0.042, r = 0.3). Compared to baseline, the intervention group showed a significant reduction in neck pain (Chi<sup>2</sup> (2) = 15.775, p &lt; 0.001, W = 0.15) and an improvement in neck-related disability (Chi<sup>2</sup> (2) = 25.094, p &lt; 0.001, W = 0.24). The comparison group showed no significant change over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The app-based exercise program demonstrated promising results for the reduction of pain intensity and neck-related disability, offering a personalized and mobile alternative to group exercise therapy for patients with neck pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 1031-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study compares the effects of an artificial intelligence app-based exercise program with group exercise therapy on pain intensity and neck-related disability in patients with neck pain.

Participants

84 patients with neck pain. 70 fulfilled the study requirements. 52 were in the intervention and 18 in the comparison group.

Intervention

The intervention group utilized an AI-based exercise program accessible via digital devices. The AI provided 3–5 daily exercises tailored to individual feedback, pain intensity, and well-being. The exercise duration was up to 15 min per day. The comparison group attended up to two 45-min group exercise sessions weekly.

Methods

Pain intensity and neck-related disability were assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale and the Neck Disability Index via online questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for between group differences.

Results

After 8 weeks, the intervention group showed a significantly lower pain intensity than the comparison group (U = 287, Z = −2.447, p = 0.042, r = 0.3). Compared to baseline, the intervention group showed a significant reduction in neck pain (Chi2 (2) = 15.775, p < 0.001, W = 0.15) and an improvement in neck-related disability (Chi2 (2) = 25.094, p < 0.001, W = 0.24). The comparison group showed no significant change over time.

Conclusion

The app-based exercise program demonstrated promising results for the reduction of pain intensity and neck-related disability, offering a personalized and mobile alternative to group exercise therapy for patients with neck pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与团体运动疗法相比,基于人工智能的运动项目对颈部疼痛患者疼痛强度和残疾的影响:一项队列研究
目的比较基于人工智能应用程序的运动项目与团体运动疗法对颈部疼痛患者疼痛强度和颈部相关残疾的影响。参与者为84例颈部疼痛患者。70人符合研究要求。干预组52人,对照组18人。干预组采用基于人工智能的锻炼计划,可通过数字设备访问。人工智能根据个人反馈、疼痛强度和健康状况提供3-5次每日锻炼。每天的运动时间长达15分钟。对照组每周最多参加两次45分钟的集体锻炼。方法采用11分制数值评定量表和颈部残疾指数,在基线、4周和8周通过在线问卷对西班牙强度和颈部相关残疾进行评估。采用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验来检验组间差异。结果8周后,干预组疼痛强度明显低于对照组(U = 287, Z =−2.447,p = 0.042, r = 0.3)。与基线相比,干预组颈部疼痛明显减轻(Chi2 (2) = 15.775, p <;0.001, W = 0.15)和颈部相关残疾的改善(ch2 (2) = 25.094, p <;0.001, w = 0.24)。对照组在时间上没有明显的变化。结论基于app的运动项目在减轻疼痛强度和颈部相关残疾方面显示出良好的效果,为颈部疼痛患者提供了个性化和可移动的团体运动治疗替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding dry needling to physical therapy for chronic neck pain in upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome Is there a relationship between kinesiophobia and the functional capacity of women with knee osteoarthritis? Wearable technologies in neurorehabilitation and cardiac rehabilitation: A narrative review Leveraging technology-based interventions with varying levels of immersion for the assessment of low back pain: a scoping review Factors associated with chronic low back pain and central sensitization in office workers: a multidimensional analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1