{"title":"Relationship between compressive stiffness and tensile stiffness in the human Achilles tendon in vivo","authors":"Tomonobu Ishigaki , Tomoya Ishida , Takumi Ino , Takumi Okunuki , Hiroko Yokoyama , Mutsuaki Edama","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tendon elongation is measured using ultrasound images during isometric ramp contractions in traditional measurement techniques for human tendon mechanical properties, and tendon tensile stiffness (TS) is calculated from the slope of specific force intervals in the tendon force–elongation curve. Recently, the compressive stiffness (CS) of tendons, measured using a myotonometer, has attracted attention as a new technique for investigating tendon mechanical properties <em>in vivo</em>. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between tensile and compressive Achilles tendon stiffness <em>in vivo</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty young healthy adults (20.7 ± 18 years) participated in this study. TS was measured using B-mode ultrasonography and a dynamometer and calculated from the slope of the specific force intervals (25–45%, 30–70%, 50–100%, and 90–100% maximum voluntary contraction) in the tendon force–elongation curve. CS in the resting condition was measured at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm proximal to the calcaneus Achilles tendon insertion. The data obtained from each measurement region, as well as the average of those data, were used for further correlation analysis. The relationship between TS and CS was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Correlation analysis demonstrated no relationship between TS and CS regardless of the force intervals in TS (<em>r</em> = - 0.019–0.251, <em>P</em> = 0.181–0.980).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current results suggest that each measurement technique for the TS and CS evaluates different tendon mechanical properties. Researchers and clinicians should consider the characteristics of these two measurement techniques and select the appropriate method depending on the research purpose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 1073-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Tendon elongation is measured using ultrasound images during isometric ramp contractions in traditional measurement techniques for human tendon mechanical properties, and tendon tensile stiffness (TS) is calculated from the slope of specific force intervals in the tendon force–elongation curve. Recently, the compressive stiffness (CS) of tendons, measured using a myotonometer, has attracted attention as a new technique for investigating tendon mechanical properties in vivo. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between tensile and compressive Achilles tendon stiffness in vivo.
Methods
Thirty young healthy adults (20.7 ± 18 years) participated in this study. TS was measured using B-mode ultrasonography and a dynamometer and calculated from the slope of the specific force intervals (25–45%, 30–70%, 50–100%, and 90–100% maximum voluntary contraction) in the tendon force–elongation curve. CS in the resting condition was measured at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm proximal to the calcaneus Achilles tendon insertion. The data obtained from each measurement region, as well as the average of those data, were used for further correlation analysis. The relationship between TS and CS was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
Results
Correlation analysis demonstrated no relationship between TS and CS regardless of the force intervals in TS (r = - 0.019–0.251, P = 0.181–0.980).
Conclusion
The current results suggest that each measurement technique for the TS and CS evaluates different tendon mechanical properties. Researchers and clinicians should consider the characteristics of these two measurement techniques and select the appropriate method depending on the research purpose.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina