Relationship between compressive stiffness and tensile stiffness in the human Achilles tendon in vivo

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.03.011
Tomonobu Ishigaki , Tomoya Ishida , Takumi Ino , Takumi Okunuki , Hiroko Yokoyama , Mutsuaki Edama
{"title":"Relationship between compressive stiffness and tensile stiffness in the human Achilles tendon in vivo","authors":"Tomonobu Ishigaki ,&nbsp;Tomoya Ishida ,&nbsp;Takumi Ino ,&nbsp;Takumi Okunuki ,&nbsp;Hiroko Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Mutsuaki Edama","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tendon elongation is measured using ultrasound images during isometric ramp contractions in traditional measurement techniques for human tendon mechanical properties, and tendon tensile stiffness (TS) is calculated from the slope of specific force intervals in the tendon force–elongation curve. Recently, the compressive stiffness (CS) of tendons, measured using a myotonometer, has attracted attention as a new technique for investigating tendon mechanical properties <em>in vivo</em>. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between tensile and compressive Achilles tendon stiffness <em>in vivo</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty young healthy adults (20.7 ± 18 years) participated in this study. TS was measured using B-mode ultrasonography and a dynamometer and calculated from the slope of the specific force intervals (25–45%, 30–70%, 50–100%, and 90–100% maximum voluntary contraction) in the tendon force–elongation curve. CS in the resting condition was measured at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm proximal to the calcaneus Achilles tendon insertion. The data obtained from each measurement region, as well as the average of those data, were used for further correlation analysis. The relationship between TS and CS was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Correlation analysis demonstrated no relationship between TS and CS regardless of the force intervals in TS (<em>r</em> = - 0.019–0.251, <em>P</em> = 0.181–0.980).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current results suggest that each measurement technique for the TS and CS evaluates different tendon mechanical properties. Researchers and clinicians should consider the characteristics of these two measurement techniques and select the appropriate method depending on the research purpose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 1073-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tendon elongation is measured using ultrasound images during isometric ramp contractions in traditional measurement techniques for human tendon mechanical properties, and tendon tensile stiffness (TS) is calculated from the slope of specific force intervals in the tendon force–elongation curve. Recently, the compressive stiffness (CS) of tendons, measured using a myotonometer, has attracted attention as a new technique for investigating tendon mechanical properties in vivo. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between tensile and compressive Achilles tendon stiffness in vivo.

Methods

Thirty young healthy adults (20.7 ± 18 years) participated in this study. TS was measured using B-mode ultrasonography and a dynamometer and calculated from the slope of the specific force intervals (25–45%, 30–70%, 50–100%, and 90–100% maximum voluntary contraction) in the tendon force–elongation curve. CS in the resting condition was measured at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 cm proximal to the calcaneus Achilles tendon insertion. The data obtained from each measurement region, as well as the average of those data, were used for further correlation analysis. The relationship between TS and CS was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

Results

Correlation analysis demonstrated no relationship between TS and CS regardless of the force intervals in TS (r = - 0.019–0.251, P = 0.181–0.980).

Conclusion

The current results suggest that each measurement technique for the TS and CS evaluates different tendon mechanical properties. Researchers and clinicians should consider the characteristics of these two measurement techniques and select the appropriate method depending on the research purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Relationship between compressive stiffness and tensile stiffness in the human Achilles tendon in vivo Acute effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on the flexibility, strength, vertical jump, and dynamic balance performances of the plantar flexor muscle in professional football players Immediate effects of foam rolling on lateral thigh soft tissue movement: A pilot study Back-leg-chest test as an alternative to the handgrip testing for measuring body strength in adults Effects of an artificial intelligence-based exercise program on pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain compared with group exercise therapy: A cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1