Uses and recommendations of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Brazil

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine Advances in integrative medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aimed.2024.08.019
Jefferson Alves Santana , João Luis Almeida da Silva , Icaro J.S. Ribeiro
{"title":"Uses and recommendations of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Brazil","authors":"Jefferson Alves Santana ,&nbsp;João Luis Almeida da Silva ,&nbsp;Icaro J.S. Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>The growing interest in preventive health practices, either as a complement or substitute for conventional treatments, is currently notable. Particularly noteworthy are Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) therapies, with a prevalence of usage varying globally. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors associated with the prevalence of usage and recommendation of TCIM therapies in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>It is a cross-sectional study using secondary data from the National Health Survey. A total of 279,141 participants were evaluated, predominantly females, individuals of mixed race, single, and with a high school or higher education. To describe the data, absolute and relative frequencies were used and prevalence ratios and their respective confidence intervals (95 %CI) calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The prevalence of TCIM therapies was 4.74 %. The usage of these practices was more common among females, individuals over 60 years old, and white individuals, while it was less prevalent among those without a partner. The Southern and Northern regions of Brazil showed a higher prevalence of TCIM. Medicinal plants were the most used TCIM, followed by acupuncture. In the prescription by healthcare professionals, work-related musculoskeletal disorders were the most common indication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This article provides insights into the usage and prescription profile of TCIM in Brazil, essential for guiding health policies and integrating these practices into the healthcare system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 291-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

The growing interest in preventive health practices, either as a complement or substitute for conventional treatments, is currently notable. Particularly noteworthy are Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) therapies, with a prevalence of usage varying globally. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the factors associated with the prevalence of usage and recommendation of TCIM therapies in Brazil.

Material and methods

It is a cross-sectional study using secondary data from the National Health Survey. A total of 279,141 participants were evaluated, predominantly females, individuals of mixed race, single, and with a high school or higher education. To describe the data, absolute and relative frequencies were used and prevalence ratios and their respective confidence intervals (95 %CI) calculated.

Results

The prevalence of TCIM therapies was 4.74 %. The usage of these practices was more common among females, individuals over 60 years old, and white individuals, while it was less prevalent among those without a partner. The Southern and Northern regions of Brazil showed a higher prevalence of TCIM. Medicinal plants were the most used TCIM, followed by acupuncture. In the prescription by healthcare professionals, work-related musculoskeletal disorders were the most common indication.

Conclusion

This article provides insights into the usage and prescription profile of TCIM in Brazil, essential for guiding health policies and integrating these practices into the healthcare system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Uses and recommendations of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Brazil The effect of basic body awareness therapy on awareness, stress and anxiety in pregnant women Modified yoga program for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Editorial: Indigenous medicine—A wisdom of balance and belonging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1