Limb-Kinetic apraxia of legs in Parkinson’s disease: Prospective clinical investigation

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100302
Yacov Balash , Evelin D. Mate , Riyad Idries , Anda Eilam , Amos D. Korczyn
{"title":"Limb-Kinetic apraxia of legs in Parkinson’s disease: Prospective clinical investigation","authors":"Yacov Balash ,&nbsp;Evelin D. Mate ,&nbsp;Riyad Idries ,&nbsp;Anda Eilam ,&nbsp;Amos D. Korczyn","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The study of dynamic organization of motor acts is important for investigation of motor impairment, and a possible sign of a disorder of fronto-parietal areas of the brain in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We aimed to prospectively investigate whether limb-kinetic apraxia in legs (LKA-L) is a heretofore unrecognized manifestation of PD independent of bradykinesia and rigidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with PD and healthy controls (HC) performed bipedal reciprocal coordination (BRC) and monopedal reciprocal coordination (MRC) tests as a foot modification of the Oseretzky exam (originally alternate antiphase clenching and unclenching of the fists of the right and left hands). While MRC allowed for alternating movements of one leg per unit of time, BRC required synchronous movements of both legs in antiphase. Leg movement rates and their quality were measured by video recording and compared statistically between the groups of PD and HC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort consisted of 31 PD patients (mean age 69.3 ± 7.1 years,16 males) and 12 HC (mean age 69 ± 6.2 years, 6 males). No differences between PD and HC groups were identified in MRC rate of performance, which were used as a measure of legs movement speed, although the quality of MRC movements was poorer in PD patients (<em>p</em> = 0.022). BRC rate and its performance quality were significantly flawed in PD compared to controls (<em>P</em> = 0.002 and <em>P</em> = 0.003, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Testing for dynamic organization of LKA-L revealed disorder in individuals with PD. LKA-L analyses should be considered in the diagnosis of leg movements and gait disorders in PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study of dynamic organization of motor acts is important for investigation of motor impairment, and a possible sign of a disorder of fronto-parietal areas of the brain in Parkinson’s disease (PD). We aimed to prospectively investigate whether limb-kinetic apraxia in legs (LKA-L) is a heretofore unrecognized manifestation of PD independent of bradykinesia and rigidity.

Methods

Patients with PD and healthy controls (HC) performed bipedal reciprocal coordination (BRC) and monopedal reciprocal coordination (MRC) tests as a foot modification of the Oseretzky exam (originally alternate antiphase clenching and unclenching of the fists of the right and left hands). While MRC allowed for alternating movements of one leg per unit of time, BRC required synchronous movements of both legs in antiphase. Leg movement rates and their quality were measured by video recording and compared statistically between the groups of PD and HC.

Results

The cohort consisted of 31 PD patients (mean age 69.3 ± 7.1 years,16 males) and 12 HC (mean age 69 ± 6.2 years, 6 males). No differences between PD and HC groups were identified in MRC rate of performance, which were used as a measure of legs movement speed, although the quality of MRC movements was poorer in PD patients (p = 0.022). BRC rate and its performance quality were significantly flawed in PD compared to controls (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

Testing for dynamic organization of LKA-L revealed disorder in individuals with PD. LKA-L analyses should be considered in the diagnosis of leg movements and gait disorders in PD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病下肢运动失用症:前瞻性临床研究
研究运动行为的动态组织对于研究帕金森病(PD)的运动损伤具有重要意义,并且可能是帕金森病大脑额顶叶区紊乱的标志。我们的目的是前瞻性地研究肢体运动性失用症(LKA-L)是否是PD的一种迄今未被认识的独立于运动迟缓和僵硬的表现。方法PD患者和健康对照(HC)分别进行双足相互协调(BRC)和单足相互协调(MRC)测试,作为对Oseretzky检查(原来是右手和左手拳头交替反相握紧和松开)的足部修改。MRC允许一条腿在单位时间内交替运动,而BRC要求两条腿在反相中同步运动。通过录像测量PD组和HC组的腿部运动速率和运动质量,并进行统计学比较。结果共纳入31例PD患者(平均年龄69.3±7.1岁,男性16例)和12例HC患者(平均年龄69±6.2岁,男性6例)。尽管PD患者的MRC运动质量较差(p = 0.022),但PD组和HC组在MRC表现率(用于衡量腿部运动速度)方面没有发现差异(p = 0.022)。与对照组相比,PD组BRC率和预后质量存在显著差异(P = 0.002和P = 0.003)。结论LKA-L动态组织检测显示PD患者存在障碍。LKA-L分析应考虑在PD的腿部运动和步态障碍的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Differentiating effects of levodopa and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on motor features in Parkinson disease Emerging neurotechnological approaches to management of sleep disturbances in Parkinson’s disease The electric brain: approach to suboptimal DBS parameters Explore thyself: is it time for metacognition screening in clinical trials? Validation of the Norwegian version of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1