Comparative methods to predict redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in truncal catheters.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406
Brittani Bungart, Lana Joudeh, Eric S Schwenk, Christopher Chiang, Michael R Fettiplace
{"title":"Comparative methods to predict redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in truncal catheters.","authors":"Brittani Bungart, Lana Joudeh, Eric S Schwenk, Christopher Chiang, Michael R Fettiplace","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the frequent use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, there is limited guidance on redosing of these medications following an initial bolus. Intermittent redosing is a clinical practice in the setting of nerve catheters, often utilizing large doses. Comparatively, theoretical elimination rates are available from pharmacokinetic studies, providing estimates on total body content of these drugs. We hypothesized that published redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in clinical literature comported with safe elimination of the drugs based on pharmacokinetic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were identified from previously published manuscripts that used intermittent bolus dosing into the transversus abdominis plane and paravertebral space. The dosing data were fit to an exponential curve using least squares regression and 1/Y2 weighting with the equation : Y = YM - (YM - Y0)* e-k*x where YM is the maximal dose (175 mg for bupivacaine, 210 mg for ropivacaine), Y0 is the dose at time zero, k is the elimination constant and x is time. Both minimal (i.e. slowest) and average pharmacokinetic elimination constants for ropivacaine and bupivacaine were identified in the published literature. Clinical redosing was compared with pharmacokinetic elimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximal pharmacokinetic half-lives of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were 603 minutes (range 154 - 2970 minutes, N=49) and 528 minutes (range 204 - 3276 minutes, N=39) respectively. Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine fit to an exponential curve with kbupi(clinical) = 0.077 hrs-1 , representing the 53.5 th percentile of extracted pharmacokinetic minimal elimination constants. Clinically reported redosing of ropivacaine fit to a curve with kropi(clinical) = 0.083 hrs-1 consistent with the 52nd percentile of minimal pharmacokinetic elimination constants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the published literature reflect the slowest pharmacokinetic elimination based on human studies. The combined data without evidence of toxicity permit us to make practical recommendations about safe redosing of these agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the frequent use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, there is limited guidance on redosing of these medications following an initial bolus. Intermittent redosing is a clinical practice in the setting of nerve catheters, often utilizing large doses. Comparatively, theoretical elimination rates are available from pharmacokinetic studies, providing estimates on total body content of these drugs. We hypothesized that published redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in clinical literature comported with safe elimination of the drugs based on pharmacokinetic studies.

Methods: Clinical redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were identified from previously published manuscripts that used intermittent bolus dosing into the transversus abdominis plane and paravertebral space. The dosing data were fit to an exponential curve using least squares regression and 1/Y2 weighting with the equation : Y = YM - (YM - Y0)* e-k*x where YM is the maximal dose (175 mg for bupivacaine, 210 mg for ropivacaine), Y0 is the dose at time zero, k is the elimination constant and x is time. Both minimal (i.e. slowest) and average pharmacokinetic elimination constants for ropivacaine and bupivacaine were identified in the published literature. Clinical redosing was compared with pharmacokinetic elimination.

Results: The maximal pharmacokinetic half-lives of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were 603 minutes (range 154 - 2970 minutes, N=49) and 528 minutes (range 204 - 3276 minutes, N=39) respectively. Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine fit to an exponential curve with kbupi(clinical) = 0.077 hrs-1 , representing the 53.5 th percentile of extracted pharmacokinetic minimal elimination constants. Clinically reported redosing of ropivacaine fit to a curve with kropi(clinical) = 0.083 hrs-1 consistent with the 52nd percentile of minimal pharmacokinetic elimination constants.

Conclusions: Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the published literature reflect the slowest pharmacokinetic elimination based on human studies. The combined data without evidence of toxicity permit us to make practical recommendations about safe redosing of these agents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测布比卡因和罗哌卡因在躯干导管中再用药量的比较方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Airway Injury during Double-lumen Endotracheal Intubation. Periacetabular Osteotomy Multimodal Pain Control Using Erector Spinae Plane vs Epidural Catheter: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Comparative methods to predict redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in truncal catheters. Measuring Well-Being Influencers: Development and Validation of the WISH Inventory. Catheter-related Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis in Neonates and Long-term Consequences: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1