Brittani Bungart, Lana Joudeh, Eric S Schwenk, Christopher Chiang, Michael R Fettiplace
{"title":"Comparative methods to predict redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in truncal catheters.","authors":"Brittani Bungart, Lana Joudeh, Eric S Schwenk, Christopher Chiang, Michael R Fettiplace","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the frequent use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, there is limited guidance on redosing of these medications following an initial bolus. Intermittent redosing is a clinical practice in the setting of nerve catheters, often utilizing large doses. Comparatively, theoretical elimination rates are available from pharmacokinetic studies, providing estimates on total body content of these drugs. We hypothesized that published redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in clinical literature comported with safe elimination of the drugs based on pharmacokinetic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were identified from previously published manuscripts that used intermittent bolus dosing into the transversus abdominis plane and paravertebral space. The dosing data were fit to an exponential curve using least squares regression and 1/Y2 weighting with the equation : Y = YM - (YM - Y0)* e-k*x where YM is the maximal dose (175 mg for bupivacaine, 210 mg for ropivacaine), Y0 is the dose at time zero, k is the elimination constant and x is time. Both minimal (i.e. slowest) and average pharmacokinetic elimination constants for ropivacaine and bupivacaine were identified in the published literature. Clinical redosing was compared with pharmacokinetic elimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximal pharmacokinetic half-lives of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were 603 minutes (range 154 - 2970 minutes, N=49) and 528 minutes (range 204 - 3276 minutes, N=39) respectively. Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine fit to an exponential curve with kbupi(clinical) = 0.077 hrs-1 , representing the 53.5 th percentile of extracted pharmacokinetic minimal elimination constants. Clinically reported redosing of ropivacaine fit to a curve with kropi(clinical) = 0.083 hrs-1 consistent with the 52nd percentile of minimal pharmacokinetic elimination constants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the published literature reflect the slowest pharmacokinetic elimination based on human studies. The combined data without evidence of toxicity permit us to make practical recommendations about safe redosing of these agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite the frequent use of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, there is limited guidance on redosing of these medications following an initial bolus. Intermittent redosing is a clinical practice in the setting of nerve catheters, often utilizing large doses. Comparatively, theoretical elimination rates are available from pharmacokinetic studies, providing estimates on total body content of these drugs. We hypothesized that published redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in clinical literature comported with safe elimination of the drugs based on pharmacokinetic studies.
Methods: Clinical redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were identified from previously published manuscripts that used intermittent bolus dosing into the transversus abdominis plane and paravertebral space. The dosing data were fit to an exponential curve using least squares regression and 1/Y2 weighting with the equation : Y = YM - (YM - Y0)* e-k*x where YM is the maximal dose (175 mg for bupivacaine, 210 mg for ropivacaine), Y0 is the dose at time zero, k is the elimination constant and x is time. Both minimal (i.e. slowest) and average pharmacokinetic elimination constants for ropivacaine and bupivacaine were identified in the published literature. Clinical redosing was compared with pharmacokinetic elimination.
Results: The maximal pharmacokinetic half-lives of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were 603 minutes (range 154 - 2970 minutes, N=49) and 528 minutes (range 204 - 3276 minutes, N=39) respectively. Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine fit to an exponential curve with kbupi(clinical) = 0.077 hrs-1 , representing the 53.5 th percentile of extracted pharmacokinetic minimal elimination constants. Clinically reported redosing of ropivacaine fit to a curve with kropi(clinical) = 0.083 hrs-1 consistent with the 52nd percentile of minimal pharmacokinetic elimination constants.
Conclusions: Clinically reported redosing of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in the published literature reflect the slowest pharmacokinetic elimination based on human studies. The combined data without evidence of toxicity permit us to make practical recommendations about safe redosing of these agents.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.