Acute effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on endurance and maximal voluntary contraction in lower limbs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-07008-9
Geanny Zanirate Flor, Walace Monteiro, Ramdel Caldas Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho de Oliveira, Gonzalo Marquez, Eduardo Lattari
{"title":"Acute effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on endurance and maximal voluntary contraction in lower limbs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Geanny Zanirate Flor, Walace Monteiro, Ramdel Caldas Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho de Oliveira, Gonzalo Marquez, Eduardo Lattari","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07008-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the effects of single-dose anodal tDCS on isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and isometric endurance performance in lower limb exercises with healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published between database inception and June 11, 2024. All randomized controlled trials on anodal tDCS interventions for MVC and isometric endurance in lower limb exercises were included, with no date restrictions. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Jadad Scale, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The Open Science Framework registered the protocol in June 2024 (DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AG93M ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 interventions were included, comprising 15 for MVC and 5 for 'Time to Task Failure' (TTF), which refers to isometric endurance performance measured in seconds. The findings showed no difference in the MVC (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI = - 0.14, 0.25; P = 0.57) and TTF performance (WMD = 0.07; 95% CI = - 0.26, 0.40; P = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current meta-analysis indicated that anodal tDCS did not increase isometric MVC and isometric endurance performance in lower limb exercises in healthy adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 3","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07008-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effects of single-dose anodal tDCS on isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and isometric endurance performance in lower limb exercises with healthy adults.

Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies published between database inception and June 11, 2024. All randomized controlled trials on anodal tDCS interventions for MVC and isometric endurance in lower limb exercises were included, with no date restrictions. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Jadad Scale, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The Open Science Framework registered the protocol in June 2024 (DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AG93M ).

Results: 20 interventions were included, comprising 15 for MVC and 5 for 'Time to Task Failure' (TTF), which refers to isometric endurance performance measured in seconds. The findings showed no difference in the MVC (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI = - 0.14, 0.25; P = 0.57) and TTF performance (WMD = 0.07; 95% CI = - 0.26, 0.40; P = 0.68).

Conclusion: The current meta-analysis indicated that anodal tDCS did not increase isometric MVC and isometric endurance performance in lower limb exercises in healthy adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阳极经颅直流电刺激对下肢耐力和最大自主收缩的急性影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨单剂量负极tDCS对健康成人下肢运动等长自主最大收缩(MVC)和等长耐力的影响。方法:在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed、ISI Web of Science、Scopus和CINAHL,检索了数据库建立至2024年6月11日之间发表的研究。所有的随机对照试验纳入了淋巴结tDCS干预对MVC和下肢运动等长耐力的影响,没有日期限制。使用Jadad量表评估证据的质量,使用分级建议评估、发展和评价方法评估证据的确定性。开放科学框架于2024年6月注册了该协议(DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AG93M)。结果:包括20个干预措施,包括15个MVC和5个“任务失败时间”(TTF),这是指以秒为单位测量的等长耐力表现。结果显示MVC无差异(SMD = 0.06;95% ci = - 0.14, 0.25;P = 0.57)和TTF表现(WMD = 0.07;95% ci = - 0.26, 0.40;p = 0.68)。结论:目前的荟萃分析表明,在健康成人的下肢运动中,无节点tDCS并没有增加等长MVC和等长耐力表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Intersegmental gait coordination differs by walking ability in subacute stroke. A cross-sectional study of the association between the lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio and pain in parkinson's disease. Dynamic thumb localization and its adaptation: quantification with a novel robotic task. Mental fatigue and brain activation using prolonged task-based fMRI: a systematic review on time-on-task and sequential task paradigms. Research on the influence of MW on situation awareness in shearer monitoring tasks in intelligent coal mines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1