Attention and control of posture: the effects of light touch on the center-of-pressure time series regularity and simple reaction time task.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-07007-w
Anna Brachman, Justyna Michalska, Bogdan Bacik
{"title":"Attention and control of posture: the effects of light touch on the center-of-pressure time series regularity and simple reaction time task.","authors":"Anna Brachman, Justyna Michalska, Bogdan Bacik","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07007-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The stabilizing influence of a light touch (LT) on a postural sway has been consistently shown in the literature, however there is still no consensus in what way attentional resources are used when adopting LT during standing. To better elucidate the underlying mechanisms we introduced additional feedback (LT), which seems to distracts from postural control, and verified it by center of pressure (COP) regularity level and simple reaction time task. 25 healthy students randomly performed eight postural tasks, four without (NoRT)/ four with simple reaction task (RT). COP displacements were measured on a force plate in two visual conditions: eyes open/closed and two sensory conditions: without (NoLT)/with light touch (LT). Participants were asked to consider the postural task as the primary task. Although simple reaction time did not differ between postural conditions (p > 0.05), LT decreased postural sway velocity in anteroposterior direction (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.86) and decreased standard deviation (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.91) in both, reaction and visual conditions. Interestingly, RT task modified subjects behavior in NoLT conditions and caused slower COP velocity (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.53) without changes in signal regularity. Results also showed a significant increase in irregularity during standing with LT (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.86) in both vision and reaction conditions, suggesting that the signal was more random. Current results suggests that providing LT enhance postural steadiness and also seem to redirect attention externally, as shown by increased signal irregularity. Hence, LT possibly reduce the attention invested in the postural task itself. A RT task can be not sensitive enough to detect such subtle changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 3","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07007-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stabilizing influence of a light touch (LT) on a postural sway has been consistently shown in the literature, however there is still no consensus in what way attentional resources are used when adopting LT during standing. To better elucidate the underlying mechanisms we introduced additional feedback (LT), which seems to distracts from postural control, and verified it by center of pressure (COP) regularity level and simple reaction time task. 25 healthy students randomly performed eight postural tasks, four without (NoRT)/ four with simple reaction task (RT). COP displacements were measured on a force plate in two visual conditions: eyes open/closed and two sensory conditions: without (NoLT)/with light touch (LT). Participants were asked to consider the postural task as the primary task. Although simple reaction time did not differ between postural conditions (p > 0.05), LT decreased postural sway velocity in anteroposterior direction (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.86) and decreased standard deviation (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.91) in both, reaction and visual conditions. Interestingly, RT task modified subjects behavior in NoLT conditions and caused slower COP velocity (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.53) without changes in signal regularity. Results also showed a significant increase in irregularity during standing with LT (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.86) in both vision and reaction conditions, suggesting that the signal was more random. Current results suggests that providing LT enhance postural steadiness and also seem to redirect attention externally, as shown by increased signal irregularity. Hence, LT possibly reduce the attention invested in the postural task itself. A RT task can be not sensitive enough to detect such subtle changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Attention and control of posture: the effects of light touch on the center-of-pressure time series regularity and simple reaction time task. Impact of unilateral knee restraint on symmetry adaptation and double-support phase dynamic stability during split-belt walking. Acute effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on endurance and maximal voluntary contraction in lower limbs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Correction: Paraxanthine enhances memory and neuroplasticity more than caffeine in rats. Reaction time distribution analysis of bimanual movements with spatial and symbolic cues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1