Impact of unilateral knee restraint on symmetry adaptation and double-support phase dynamic stability during split-belt walking.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-07006-x
Keisuke Hirata, Hiroki Hanawa, Taku Miyazawa, Naohiko Kanemura
{"title":"Impact of unilateral knee restraint on symmetry adaptation and double-support phase dynamic stability during split-belt walking.","authors":"Keisuke Hirata, Hiroki Hanawa, Taku Miyazawa, Naohiko Kanemura","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07006-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The split-belt treadmill task is an effective tool for studying walking adaptation, particularly the symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters such as step length and double support time. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters and dynamic stability during the double-support phase in split-belt walking. We hypothesized that restraining fast-side knee extension, which is necessary for step lengthening during adaptation, would decrease dynamic stability during the double-support phase. Ten able-bodied male participants performed split-belt walking tasks under three conditions: control, fast-side knee restraint, and slow-side knee restraint. Our findings revealed that slow-side knee restraint disrupted symmetry in double support time and significantly decreased stability on the fast side during the early and late adaptation phases. Contrary to our hypothesis, fast-side knee restraint did not have a statistically significant effect on dynamic stability or symmetry. These results suggest that decreased dynamic stability during the double-support phase, particularly due to limitations in the movement of the trailing leg, may hinder the adaptation process. This study highlights the importance of dynamic stability control during the double-support phase for successful walking adaptation. Future studies with larger sample sizes and varying speed conditions are recommended to generalize these findings and develop targeted interventions to improve walking adaptability and dynamic stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 3","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07006-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The split-belt treadmill task is an effective tool for studying walking adaptation, particularly the symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters such as step length and double support time. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters and dynamic stability during the double-support phase in split-belt walking. We hypothesized that restraining fast-side knee extension, which is necessary for step lengthening during adaptation, would decrease dynamic stability during the double-support phase. Ten able-bodied male participants performed split-belt walking tasks under three conditions: control, fast-side knee restraint, and slow-side knee restraint. Our findings revealed that slow-side knee restraint disrupted symmetry in double support time and significantly decreased stability on the fast side during the early and late adaptation phases. Contrary to our hypothesis, fast-side knee restraint did not have a statistically significant effect on dynamic stability or symmetry. These results suggest that decreased dynamic stability during the double-support phase, particularly due to limitations in the movement of the trailing leg, may hinder the adaptation process. This study highlights the importance of dynamic stability control during the double-support phase for successful walking adaptation. Future studies with larger sample sizes and varying speed conditions are recommended to generalize these findings and develop targeted interventions to improve walking adaptability and dynamic stability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧膝关节约束对劈带行走对称性适应和双支撑相位动态稳定性的影响。
劈裂带跑步机任务是研究步行适应性的有效工具,特别是步长和双支撑时间等时空参数的对称性适应。本研究旨在探讨劈裂带行走双支撑阶段时空参数的对称性适应与动态稳定性之间的关系。我们假设,抑制快速侧膝关节伸展(这是适应过程中步长所必需的)会降低双支撑阶段的动态稳定性。10名身体健全的男性参与者在三种条件下进行了分带行走任务:控制、快侧膝关节约束和慢侧膝关节约束。我们的研究结果表明,慢侧膝关节约束破坏了双支撑时间的对称性,并在适应早期和后期显著降低了快速侧的稳定性。与我们的假设相反,快速侧膝关节约束对动态稳定性或对称性没有统计学上的显著影响。这些结果表明,在双支撑阶段,动态稳定性的下降,特别是由于后腿运动的限制,可能会阻碍适应过程。这项研究强调了在双支撑阶段动态稳定性控制对成功的步行适应的重要性。未来的研究建议在更大的样本量和不同的速度条件下推广这些发现,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以提高步行适应性和动态稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Sit, stand and sway: postural state modulates visual influence on sway. Coordination dynamics and speed-related adaptations in forward and backward walking. Knockdown of RNF128 attenuated Parkinson's-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons by stabilizing the SIRT1 protein. Explicitly acquired interrelations among mental schema reduces cognitive load and facilitates emergence of novel responses in mice and artificial neural networks. Response to "Comments on 'The equilibrium point hypothesis revisited: why threshold control does not explain human movement"'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1