Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w
Zheng Zhu, Jiawei Zhang, Zhihu Xu, Quan Wang, Yu Qi, Li Yang
{"title":"Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review.","authors":"Zheng Zhu, Jiawei Zhang, Zhihu Xu, Quan Wang, Yu Qi, Li Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation (NRDPN) refers to a government-led process of negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to reach reasonable prices for exclusive drugs covered by national reimbursement. Since 2016, the Chinese government has regularly implemented eight rounds of NRDPN. This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of NRDPN on drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, and health outcomes in China in the years 2016-2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the electronic databases PubMed (which includes MEDLINE), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP for all associated studies published in English or Chinese between January 2016 and December 2023. One of the following outcomes had to be reported: drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, or health outcomes. The study design had to be a randomized or non-randomized trial, an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, a repeated measures study, or a controlled before-after (CBA) study. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the studies according to Cochrane Effective Practice, Organization of Care (EPOC) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 2628 studies, we identified 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria (16 interrupted time-series studies and 4 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (66%, n = 12) have some limitations (unclear risk of bias). The published studies indicated the implementation of the NRDPN policy decreased drug prices, ranging from 24 to 72%, which increased the affordability of success-negotiated drugs (refer to those medications that have undergone a successful price negotiation process between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare authorities) and decreased out-of-pocket expenditures. The availability rate increased form 27% to 47%. It has been suggested that the NRDPN was conducive to narrowing disparities in availability and affordability across regions, hospital levels, and types of health insurance. In addition, it was associated with the increased drug expenditure by 61% due to the increased use of successful-negotiated drugs. However, there is insufficient evidence to explore the health outcome changes after the NRDPN policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence to date generally suggests the NRDPN policy is an effective way to decrease drug prices, improve access to innovative medicines, and improve fairness. It provides useful experience and lessons in improving access to innovative medicines for other low-and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation (NRDPN) refers to a government-led process of negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to reach reasonable prices for exclusive drugs covered by national reimbursement. Since 2016, the Chinese government has regularly implemented eight rounds of NRDPN. This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of NRDPN on drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, and health outcomes in China in the years 2016-2023.

Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed (which includes MEDLINE), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP for all associated studies published in English or Chinese between January 2016 and December 2023. One of the following outcomes had to be reported: drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, or health outcomes. The study design had to be a randomized or non-randomized trial, an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, a repeated measures study, or a controlled before-after (CBA) study. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the studies according to Cochrane Effective Practice, Organization of Care (EPOC) guidelines.

Results: From a total of 2628 studies, we identified 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria (16 interrupted time-series studies and 4 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (66%, n = 12) have some limitations (unclear risk of bias). The published studies indicated the implementation of the NRDPN policy decreased drug prices, ranging from 24 to 72%, which increased the affordability of success-negotiated drugs (refer to those medications that have undergone a successful price negotiation process between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare authorities) and decreased out-of-pocket expenditures. The availability rate increased form 27% to 47%. It has been suggested that the NRDPN was conducive to narrowing disparities in availability and affordability across regions, hospital levels, and types of health insurance. In addition, it was associated with the increased drug expenditure by 61% due to the increased use of successful-negotiated drugs. However, there is insufficient evidence to explore the health outcome changes after the NRDPN policy.

Conclusion: Evidence to date generally suggests the NRDPN policy is an effective way to decrease drug prices, improve access to innovative medicines, and improve fairness. It provides useful experience and lessons in improving access to innovative medicines for other low-and middle-income countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Examining general, physical, and mental health disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in the U.S. Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review. Empowering access: unveiling an overall composite spatial accessibility index to healthcare services in Southeastern Iran. Political economy analysis of health financing reforms in times of crisis: findings from three case studies in south-east Asia. Assessing the determinants of out-of-pocket health expenditures among Cambodian households in informal employment using survey data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1