Zheng Zhu, Jiawei Zhang, Zhihu Xu, Quan Wang, Yu Qi, Li Yang
{"title":"Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review.","authors":"Zheng Zhu, Jiawei Zhang, Zhihu Xu, Quan Wang, Yu Qi, Li Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation (NRDPN) refers to a government-led process of negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to reach reasonable prices for exclusive drugs covered by national reimbursement. Since 2016, the Chinese government has regularly implemented eight rounds of NRDPN. This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of NRDPN on drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, and health outcomes in China in the years 2016-2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the electronic databases PubMed (which includes MEDLINE), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP for all associated studies published in English or Chinese between January 2016 and December 2023. One of the following outcomes had to be reported: drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, or health outcomes. The study design had to be a randomized or non-randomized trial, an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, a repeated measures study, or a controlled before-after (CBA) study. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the studies according to Cochrane Effective Practice, Organization of Care (EPOC) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 2628 studies, we identified 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria (16 interrupted time-series studies and 4 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (66%, n = 12) have some limitations (unclear risk of bias). The published studies indicated the implementation of the NRDPN policy decreased drug prices, ranging from 24 to 72%, which increased the affordability of success-negotiated drugs (refer to those medications that have undergone a successful price negotiation process between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare authorities) and decreased out-of-pocket expenditures. The availability rate increased form 27% to 47%. It has been suggested that the NRDPN was conducive to narrowing disparities in availability and affordability across regions, hospital levels, and types of health insurance. In addition, it was associated with the increased drug expenditure by 61% due to the increased use of successful-negotiated drugs. However, there is insufficient evidence to explore the health outcome changes after the NRDPN policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence to date generally suggests the NRDPN policy is an effective way to decrease drug prices, improve access to innovative medicines, and improve fairness. It provides useful experience and lessons in improving access to innovative medicines for other low-and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation (NRDPN) refers to a government-led process of negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to reach reasonable prices for exclusive drugs covered by national reimbursement. Since 2016, the Chinese government has regularly implemented eight rounds of NRDPN. This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of NRDPN on drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, and health outcomes in China in the years 2016-2023.
Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed (which includes MEDLINE), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP for all associated studies published in English or Chinese between January 2016 and December 2023. One of the following outcomes had to be reported: drug price, availability, affordability, utilization, cost, or health outcomes. The study design had to be a randomized or non-randomized trial, an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, a repeated measures study, or a controlled before-after (CBA) study. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the studies according to Cochrane Effective Practice, Organization of Care (EPOC) guidelines.
Results: From a total of 2628 studies, we identified 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria (16 interrupted time-series studies and 4 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (66%, n = 12) have some limitations (unclear risk of bias). The published studies indicated the implementation of the NRDPN policy decreased drug prices, ranging from 24 to 72%, which increased the affordability of success-negotiated drugs (refer to those medications that have undergone a successful price negotiation process between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare authorities) and decreased out-of-pocket expenditures. The availability rate increased form 27% to 47%. It has been suggested that the NRDPN was conducive to narrowing disparities in availability and affordability across regions, hospital levels, and types of health insurance. In addition, it was associated with the increased drug expenditure by 61% due to the increased use of successful-negotiated drugs. However, there is insufficient evidence to explore the health outcome changes after the NRDPN policy.
Conclusion: Evidence to date generally suggests the NRDPN policy is an effective way to decrease drug prices, improve access to innovative medicines, and improve fairness. It provides useful experience and lessons in improving access to innovative medicines for other low-and middle-income countries.
目的:国家报销药品价格谈判(NRDPN)是指政府主导的与制药公司谈判的过程,目的是为国家报销的独家药品达成合理的价格。自2016年以来,中国政府已定期实施8轮自然资源保护计划。本系统综述旨在确定2016-2023年NRDPN对中国药品价格、可得性、可负担性、利用、成本和健康结局的影响。方法:检索PubMed(含MEDLINE)、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方、VIP等电子数据库,检索2016年1月至2023年12月期间发表的所有中英文相关研究。必须报告下列结果之一:药品价格、可得性、可负担性、利用、成本或健康结果。研究设计必须是随机或非随机试验、中断时间序列(ITS)分析、重复测量研究或前后对照(CBA)研究。两位审稿人独立提取数据,并根据Cochrane有效实践,护理组织(EPOC)指南评估研究。结果:从总共2628项研究中,我们确定了20项符合纳入标准的研究(16项中断时间序列研究和4项前后对照研究)。大多数研究(66%,n = 12)存在一定的局限性(偏倚风险不明确)。已发表的研究表明,NRDPN政策的实施降低了药品价格,幅度从24%到72%不等,这提高了成功谈判药物(指那些在制药公司和卫生保健当局之间成功进行价格谈判的药物)的可负担性,并减少了自付支出。可用性从27%增加到47%。据认为,NRDPN有助于缩小各地区、各级医院和各类医疗保险在可获得性和可负担性方面的差距。此外,由于成功谈判的药物的使用增加,这与药物支出增加61%有关。然而,没有足够的证据来探讨NRDPN政策后健康结果的变化。结论:迄今为止的证据表明,NRDPN政策是降低药品价格、提高创新药品可及性和提高公平性的有效途径。它为其他低收入和中等收入国家改善获得创新药物的机会提供了有益的经验和教训。
期刊介绍:
International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.