Mapping the future: The current landscape and future directions of evidence-based practice in Saudi radiology departments.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314332
Walaa Alsharif, Faisal Alrehily, Fahad H Alhazmi, Awadia Greeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Shrooq Aldahery, Adnan Alahmadi, Amirah Alsaedi, Sultan Alshoabi, Khalid M Alshamrani, Awatif M Omer, Raghad Aljuhani
{"title":"Mapping the future: The current landscape and future directions of evidence-based practice in Saudi radiology departments.","authors":"Walaa Alsharif, Faisal Alrehily, Fahad H Alhazmi, Awadia Greeballah, Abdulaziz A Qurashi, Shrooq Aldahery, Adnan Alahmadi, Amirah Alsaedi, Sultan Alshoabi, Khalid M Alshamrani, Awatif M Omer, Raghad Aljuhani","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the current application of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among radiology professionals, including radiologists and radiographers, in Saudi Arabia and to identify challenges in order to propose suitable future improvement strategies if it is required.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-method design was used in this study. A survey consisting of 23 questions addressing research activities and EBP within radiology departments was sent to radiology personnel. The sample size of the quantitative phase of the study was determined using a formula specific for an infinite or unknown population. The formula used was n = P(1-P)Z2/d2, which resulted in a required sample size of 384 participants. A total of 345 participants; however, 45 did not fully complete the questionnaire and were therefore excluded. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Inferential statistics, including non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U Test and the Kruskal-Wallis Test, were used to assess the influence of demographic factors on perceptions and challenges related to the adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) in research within Saudi Arabia. Additionally, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with radiology personnel across the country. The sampling technique for the qualitative phase of the study was guided by the study's objectives and the unique characteristics of the research group. The participants were purposively sampled in order to include radiologists and radiographers who work in different types of hospitals (public, semi-public, private) in Saudi Arabia. Responses from the interviews were coded, and key themes were identified following Miles and Huberman's framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed a positive attitude towards research and EBP among Saudi radiology personnel. Over half of the participants (74.3%) strongly agreed that they understood and were familiar with EBP. They also felt confident in their ability to conduct scientific research in radiology (Mean = 4.27) and believed that they should actively initiate projects (Mean = 4.10). Radiologists reported a higher level of agreement compared to radiographers regarding their familiarity with EBP and their ability to critically evaluate the quality of research (P-value = <0.05). However, participants indicated lower level of agreement about their ability to develop their current practice based on EBP and engage in discussions with colleagues about research evidence. Key challenges identified include a lack of training, insufficient support and limited autonomy, which may hinder EBP implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the need for comprehensive education, ongoing training and a supportive organisational culture to enhance EBP adaption.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 2","pages":"e0314332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the current application of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among radiology professionals, including radiologists and radiographers, in Saudi Arabia and to identify challenges in order to propose suitable future improvement strategies if it is required.

Method: A mixed-method design was used in this study. A survey consisting of 23 questions addressing research activities and EBP within radiology departments was sent to radiology personnel. The sample size of the quantitative phase of the study was determined using a formula specific for an infinite or unknown population. The formula used was n = P(1-P)Z2/d2, which resulted in a required sample size of 384 participants. A total of 345 participants; however, 45 did not fully complete the questionnaire and were therefore excluded. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Inferential statistics, including non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U Test and the Kruskal-Wallis Test, were used to assess the influence of demographic factors on perceptions and challenges related to the adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) in research within Saudi Arabia. Additionally, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with radiology personnel across the country. The sampling technique for the qualitative phase of the study was guided by the study's objectives and the unique characteristics of the research group. The participants were purposively sampled in order to include radiologists and radiographers who work in different types of hospitals (public, semi-public, private) in Saudi Arabia. Responses from the interviews were coded, and key themes were identified following Miles and Huberman's framework.

Results: The findings revealed a positive attitude towards research and EBP among Saudi radiology personnel. Over half of the participants (74.3%) strongly agreed that they understood and were familiar with EBP. They also felt confident in their ability to conduct scientific research in radiology (Mean = 4.27) and believed that they should actively initiate projects (Mean = 4.10). Radiologists reported a higher level of agreement compared to radiographers regarding their familiarity with EBP and their ability to critically evaluate the quality of research (P-value = <0.05). However, participants indicated lower level of agreement about their ability to develop their current practice based on EBP and engage in discussions with colleagues about research evidence. Key challenges identified include a lack of training, insufficient support and limited autonomy, which may hinder EBP implementation.

Conclusion: This study underscores the need for comprehensive education, ongoing training and a supportive organisational culture to enhance EBP adaption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制未来:沙特放射科循证实践的现状和未来方向。
目的:检查目前在沙特阿拉伯放射专业人员(包括放射科医生和放射技师)中循证实践(EBP)的应用情况,并确定挑战,以便在需要时提出合适的未来改进策略。方法:采用混合方法设计。一份由23个问题组成的调查问卷被发送给放射科人员,涉及放射科的研究活动和EBP。研究定量阶段的样本量是用一个特定于无限或未知人群的公式确定的。使用的公式是n = P(1-P)Z2/d2,这导致所需的样本量为384名参与者。共345名参与者;然而,有45人没有完全完成问卷,因此被排除在外。数据分析采用SPSS第27版。推论统计,包括非参数检验,如Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验,用于评估人口因素对沙特阿拉伯境内研究中采用循证实践(EBP)的认知和挑战的影响。此外,对全国各地的放射学人员进行了20次半结构化访谈。研究定性阶段的抽样技术以研究目标和研究小组的独特特征为指导。有目的地对参与者进行抽样,以便包括在沙特阿拉伯不同类型医院(公立、半公立和私立)工作的放射科医生和放射技师。采访的回答被编码,并根据Miles和Huberman的框架确定了关键主题。结果:沙特放射学人员对研究和EBP持积极态度。超过一半的参与者(74.3%)强烈同意他们理解并熟悉EBP。他们对自己开展放射学科学研究的能力也有信心(平均= 4.27),并认为自己应该积极发起项目(平均= 4.10)。与放射技师相比,放射科医师对EBP的熟悉程度和对研究质量的批判性评估能力的认同程度更高(p值=结论:该研究强调了全面教育、持续培训和支持性组织文化的必要性,以增强EBP的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Association between morphometric measurements and disease progression in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels with preclinical degenerative mitral valve disease: A retrospective longitudinal study. Orthostatic tolerance and training methodology in physically active men and women. Patient safety culture among paramedic university students in Saudi Arabia. Non-invasive host transcriptome and HPV oncogene expression map the molecular landscape of HPV-driven cervical lesions. Optimizing spatial equity of urban park cooling services: Integrating landscape metrics with K-means and PSO algorithms in Nanchang, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1