Evaluating nurses' psychological and operational preparedness for mass-casualty events in Saudi Arabia

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Nursing Review Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/inr.70002
Nasser Shubayr PhD
{"title":"Evaluating nurses' psychological and operational preparedness for mass-casualty events in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Nasser Shubayr PhD","doi":"10.1111/inr.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study assessed nurses' psychological and operational preparedness for mass-casualty events in healthcare settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses are vital responders in mass-casualty events, which demand quick and effective actions. Both psychological and operational preparedness are key to ensuring their ability to manage such high-pressure situations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among 156 emergency nurses in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping and the Hospital Emergency Incident Command System to assess psychological and operational preparedness. Data collection included demographic information, previous training, incident response experience, preparedness priorities for various mass-casualty events, and perceived challenges and barriers to response. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Discrepancies were observed between training and response experience for mass-casualty events, with natural disasters showing the highest alignment and priority, while transportation and fire-related incidents had a greater response than training, suggesting reliance on practical experience rather than formal education. War injuries were among the highly prioritized, with training exceeding response, potentially reflecting geopolitical concerns. Psychological and operational preparedness were moderately rated, with a strong correlation between the two, indicating that enhancing psychological resilience could improve overall preparedness. Key perceived barriers included staff shortages, inadequate resources, psychological stress, insufficient training, and unclear protocols or lack of guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights moderate preparedness levels, with a need for more targeted training and systemic improvements to address identified barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing and health policy</h3>\n \n <p>Health policies should prioritize comprehensive disaster preparedness programs with mental health support, clear protocols, and adequate training to improve nurse preparedness for mass-casualty events. Addressing perceived barriers will strengthen the healthcare system's emergency response.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study assessed nurses' psychological and operational preparedness for mass-casualty events in healthcare settings.

Background

Nurses are vital responders in mass-casualty events, which demand quick and effective actions. Both psychological and operational preparedness are key to ensuring their ability to manage such high-pressure situations.

Methods

A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among 156 emergency nurses in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping and the Hospital Emergency Incident Command System to assess psychological and operational preparedness. Data collection included demographic information, previous training, incident response experience, preparedness priorities for various mass-casualty events, and perceived challenges and barriers to response. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Findings

Discrepancies were observed between training and response experience for mass-casualty events, with natural disasters showing the highest alignment and priority, while transportation and fire-related incidents had a greater response than training, suggesting reliance on practical experience rather than formal education. War injuries were among the highly prioritized, with training exceeding response, potentially reflecting geopolitical concerns. Psychological and operational preparedness were moderately rated, with a strong correlation between the two, indicating that enhancing psychological resilience could improve overall preparedness. Key perceived barriers included staff shortages, inadequate resources, psychological stress, insufficient training, and unclear protocols or lack of guidelines.

Conclusion

The study highlights moderate preparedness levels, with a need for more targeted training and systemic improvements to address identified barriers.

Implications for nursing and health policy

Health policies should prioritize comprehensive disaster preparedness programs with mental health support, clear protocols, and adequate training to improve nurse preparedness for mass-casualty events. Addressing perceived barriers will strengthen the healthcare system's emergency response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating nurses' psychological and operational preparedness for mass-casualty events in Saudi Arabia Impact of violence on work morale on Taiwanese nurses: The moderator of perceived organizational support Finding the paths between job demand–resources and turnover intention of community mental health nurses in Korea Enhancing support for nurses' moral competence: A commentary on Wiisak et al.’s multilevel framework Factors influencing negative outcomes for nurses who experience patient safety incidents: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1