Comparative assessment of a restored and natural wetland using 13C-DNA SIP reveals a higher potential for methane production in the restored wetland.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Applied and Environmental Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-03-19 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1128/aem.02161-24
Nora Hamovit, Taniya RoyChowdhury, Denise M Akob, Xuesong Zhang, Gregory McCarty, Stephanie Yarwood
{"title":"Comparative assessment of a restored and natural wetland using <sup>13</sup>C-DNA SIP reveals a higher potential for methane production in the restored wetland.","authors":"Nora Hamovit, Taniya RoyChowdhury, Denise M Akob, Xuesong Zhang, Gregory McCarty, Stephanie Yarwood","doi":"10.1128/aem.02161-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), a potent greenhouse gas produced by methanogens. Methanogenesis rates are controlled by environmental factors such as redox potential, temperature, and carbon and electron acceptor availability and are presumably dependent on the composition of the active methanogen community. We collected intact soil cores from a restored and natural freshwater depressional wetland on Maryland's Delmarva Peninsula (USA) to assess the effects of wetland restoration and redox shifts on microbial processes. Intact soil cores were incubated under either saturated (anoxic) or unsaturated (oxic) conditions and amended with <sup>13</sup>C-acetate for quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) of the 16S rRNA gene. Restored wetland cores supported a distinct community of methanogens compared to natural cores, and acetoclastic methanogens putatively identified in the genus <i>Methanosarcina</i> were among the most abundant taxa in restored anoxic and oxic cores. The active microbial communities in the restored wetland cores were also distinguished by the unique presence of facultatively anaerobic bacteria belonging to the orders <i>Firmicutes</i> and <i>Bacteroidetes</i>. In natural wetland incubations, methanogen populations were not among the most abundant taxa, and these communities were instead distinguished by the unique presence of aerobic bacteria in the phyla <i>Acidobacteria</i>, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, and class <i>Alphaproteobacteria</i>. Iron-reducing bacteria, in the genus <i>Geobacter</i>, were active across all redox conditions in both the restored and the natural cores, except the natural oxic-anoxic condition. These findings suggest an overall higher potential for methanogenesis in the restored wetland site compared to the natural wetland site, even when there is evidence of Fe reduction.IMPORTANCEMethane (CH<sub>4</sub>) is a potent greenhouse gas with an atmospheric half-life of ~10 years. Wetlands are the largest natural emitters of CH<sub>4</sub>, but CH<sub>4</sub> dynamics are difficult to constrain due to high spatial and temporal variability. In the past, wetlands were drained for agriculture. Now, restoration is an important strategy to increase these ecosystems' potential for sequestering carbon. However, the consequences of wetland restoration on carbon biogeochemistry are under-evaluated, and a thorough assessment of the active microbial community as a driver of biogeochemical changes is needed. Particularly, the effects of seasonal flooding/drying cycles in geographically isolated wetlands might have implications for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in both natural and restored wetlands. Here, we found that active microbial communities in natural and restored wetlands responded differently to flooding and drying regimes, resulting in differences in CH<sub>4</sub> production potentials. Restored wetlands had a higher potential for CH<sub>4</sub> production compared to natural wetlands. Our results show that controls on CH<sub>4</sub> production in a restored wetland are complex, and dynamics of active microbial communities are linked to seasonal dry-wet cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0216124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02161-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas produced by methanogens. Methanogenesis rates are controlled by environmental factors such as redox potential, temperature, and carbon and electron acceptor availability and are presumably dependent on the composition of the active methanogen community. We collected intact soil cores from a restored and natural freshwater depressional wetland on Maryland's Delmarva Peninsula (USA) to assess the effects of wetland restoration and redox shifts on microbial processes. Intact soil cores were incubated under either saturated (anoxic) or unsaturated (oxic) conditions and amended with 13C-acetate for quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) of the 16S rRNA gene. Restored wetland cores supported a distinct community of methanogens compared to natural cores, and acetoclastic methanogens putatively identified in the genus Methanosarcina were among the most abundant taxa in restored anoxic and oxic cores. The active microbial communities in the restored wetland cores were also distinguished by the unique presence of facultatively anaerobic bacteria belonging to the orders Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. In natural wetland incubations, methanogen populations were not among the most abundant taxa, and these communities were instead distinguished by the unique presence of aerobic bacteria in the phyla Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and class Alphaproteobacteria. Iron-reducing bacteria, in the genus Geobacter, were active across all redox conditions in both the restored and the natural cores, except the natural oxic-anoxic condition. These findings suggest an overall higher potential for methanogenesis in the restored wetland site compared to the natural wetland site, even when there is evidence of Fe reduction.IMPORTANCEMethane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas with an atmospheric half-life of ~10 years. Wetlands are the largest natural emitters of CH4, but CH4 dynamics are difficult to constrain due to high spatial and temporal variability. In the past, wetlands were drained for agriculture. Now, restoration is an important strategy to increase these ecosystems' potential for sequestering carbon. However, the consequences of wetland restoration on carbon biogeochemistry are under-evaluated, and a thorough assessment of the active microbial community as a driver of biogeochemical changes is needed. Particularly, the effects of seasonal flooding/drying cycles in geographically isolated wetlands might have implications for CH4 emissions in both natural and restored wetlands. Here, we found that active microbial communities in natural and restored wetlands responded differently to flooding and drying regimes, resulting in differences in CH4 production potentials. Restored wetlands had a higher potential for CH4 production compared to natural wetlands. Our results show that controls on CH4 production in a restored wetland are complex, and dynamics of active microbial communities are linked to seasonal dry-wet cycles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用13C-DNA SIP对恢复湿地和自然湿地进行对比评估,发现恢复湿地具有更高的产甲烷潜力。
湿地是甲烷(CH4)的最大天然来源,甲烷是一种由产甲烷菌产生的强效温室气体。甲烷生成速率受氧化还原电位、温度、碳和电子受体可用性等环境因素的控制,并且可能取决于活性产甲烷菌群落的组成。我们收集了美国马里兰州德尔马瓦半岛(Delmarva Peninsula)一个恢复后的天然淡水洼地湿地的完整土壤岩心,以评估湿地恢复和氧化还原变化对微生物过程的影响。在饱和(缺氧)或不饱和(缺氧)条件下培养完整的土壤岩心,并用13c -乙酸酯修饰16S rRNA基因的定量稳定同位素探测(qSIP)。与自然岩心相比,恢复后的湿地岩心中存在明显不同的产甲烷菌群落,而在恢复后的缺氧和缺氧岩心中发现的产甲烷菌属(Methanosarcina)为最丰富的产甲烷菌类群。在恢复后的湿地岩心中,活跃的微生物群落也以属于厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门的兼性厌氧细菌的独特存在为特征。在自然湿地孵育中,产甲烷菌群并不在最丰富的分类群之列,而这些群落的特点是在酸杆菌门、放线菌门和阿尔法变形菌纲中存在独特的需氧细菌。除自然缺氧条件外,还原铁细菌在还原岩心和自然岩心的所有氧化还原条件下都具有活性。这些发现表明,即使存在铁还原的证据,与自然湿地相比,恢复湿地的甲烷生成潜力总体上更高。甲烷(CH4)是一种强效温室气体,在大气中的半衰期为~10年。湿地是最大的CH4天然排放源,但CH4的时空变异性较大,难以对其动态进行约束。过去,湿地被排干用于农业。现在,恢复是增加这些生态系统固碳潜力的重要策略。然而,湿地恢复对碳生物地球化学的影响被低估了,需要对活跃的微生物群落作为生物地球化学变化的驱动因素进行全面的评估。特别是,在地理上孤立的湿地中,季节性洪水/干旱循环的影响可能会对自然湿地和恢复湿地的CH4排放产生影响。本研究发现,自然湿地和恢复湿地中活跃的微生物群落对洪涝和干旱的响应不同,从而导致CH4生产潜力的差异。与自然湿地相比,恢复湿地具有更高的CH4生产潜力。我们的研究结果表明,恢复湿地中CH4产生的控制是复杂的,活跃微生物群落的动态与季节性干湿循环有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic insights into substrate-targeting modification effects on interfacial kinetics of raw starch-degrading amylases. Comprehensive pan-effectome investigation reveals central effector genes in woody plant pathogen Botryosphaeriaceae. Enhanced microbiota-derived mucinases in colorectal cancer patients revealed by gut metagenome probing coupled with functional validation. From clinics to sewers: leveraging environmental surveillance and whole genome sequencing to inform transmission of ESBL-Escherichia coli in Switzerland. Characterization of a GH17 laminarinase, MlGH17A, from a laminarin polysaccharide utilization locus in the marine bacterium Muricauda lutaonensis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1