Analysis of selected factors influencing mortality of patients with COVID-19 treated in a community hospital in a rural region of Poland.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.22605/RRH8939
Marek Kos, Renata Hatalska-Żerebiec, Małgorzata Jurczyk-Stachyra, Karol Paciura, Justyna Janeczko, Robert Podsiadły, Piotr Sobolewski
{"title":"Analysis of selected factors influencing mortality of patients with COVID-19 treated in a community hospital in a rural region of Poland.","authors":"Marek Kos, Renata Hatalska-Żerebiec, Małgorzata Jurczyk-Stachyra, Karol Paciura, Justyna Janeczko, Robert Podsiadły, Piotr Sobolewski","doi":"10.22605/RRH8939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Factors influencing mortality in patients with COVID-19 treated in a community hospital in a rural region in south-eastern Poland during the first and the second wave of the pandemic were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study based on a hospital-based registry of Holy Spirit Specialist Hospital in Sandomierz was conducted. The study population consisted of patients treated between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed data of 24 057 Caucasian patients including 798 patients with COVID-19. During both waves of the COVID-19 pandemic 22.4% of patients hospitalized in the community hospital in Sandomierz died due to COVID-19. The multivariate logistic regression model showed that older age (p<0.001), fever (p<0.001), diagnosis of sepsis (p<0.001) and high levels of C-reactive protein (p=0.041) were factors related to mortality. In the group of patients in whom oxygen therapy (p<0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.001) were used more frequently, mortality was higher, whereas treatment with convalescent plasma increased the chance of survival (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fever and high laboratory values of inflammation, in particular coexisting sepsis, worsened the prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Most traditional methods of treating the infection did not affect the course of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"25 1","pages":"8939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Factors influencing mortality in patients with COVID-19 treated in a community hospital in a rural region in south-eastern Poland during the first and the second wave of the pandemic were analyzed.

Methods: A retrospective observational study based on a hospital-based registry of Holy Spirit Specialist Hospital in Sandomierz was conducted. The study population consisted of patients treated between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2021.

Results: We analyzed data of 24 057 Caucasian patients including 798 patients with COVID-19. During both waves of the COVID-19 pandemic 22.4% of patients hospitalized in the community hospital in Sandomierz died due to COVID-19. The multivariate logistic regression model showed that older age (p<0.001), fever (p<0.001), diagnosis of sepsis (p<0.001) and high levels of C-reactive protein (p=0.041) were factors related to mortality. In the group of patients in whom oxygen therapy (p<0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (p<0.001) were used more frequently, mortality was higher, whereas treatment with convalescent plasma increased the chance of survival (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Fever and high laboratory values of inflammation, in particular coexisting sepsis, worsened the prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Most traditional methods of treating the infection did not affect the course of the disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰某农村地区社区医院收治的COVID-19患者死亡率影响因素分析
对波兰东南部农村地区社区医院收治的第一波和第二波COVID-19患者死亡率的影响因素进行了分析。方法:以桑多梅日圣灵专科医院的医院登记为基础,进行回顾性观察研究。研究人群包括2020年3月1日至2021年5月31日期间接受治疗的患者。结果:我们分析了24057例高加索患者的资料,其中798例为COVID-19。在两波COVID-19大流行期间,桑多梅日社区医院住院的患者中有22.4%死于COVID-19。多因素logistic回归模型显示,年龄越大(p)。结论:发热和高实验室炎症值,特别是合并脓毒症加重了COVID-19患者的预后。大多数治疗感染的传统方法并不影响疾病的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
Cervical cancer screening uptake and its determinants among rural women in North Central Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Encouraging youth towards rural health care through Young Medical Minds. Urban and rural inequities in end-stage kidney disease: a 7-year (2012-2018) random-effects panel study of healthcare access and catastrophic expenditure. Strengthening harm reduction services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who inject drugs: a reflexive assessment using the CONSIDER statement. The feasibility of an early-years motor skill school-based intervention research project in a low-resource area of South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1