Outcomes of Radiologist Recommendations for Temporal Bone CT to Assess Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence on Temporal Bone MRI.

Pejman Rabiei, Jisoo Kim, Amir A Satani, C Eduardo Corrales, Ronilda Lacson, Ramin Khorasani, Jeffrey P Guenette
{"title":"Outcomes of Radiologist Recommendations for Temporal Bone CT to Assess Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence on Temporal Bone MRI.","authors":"Pejman Rabiei, Jisoo Kim, Amir A Satani, C Eduardo Corrales, Ronilda Lacson, Ramin Khorasani, Jeffrey P Guenette","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Superior semicircular canal dehiscence can be detected on temporal bone MR images. Radiologists often recommend confirmation with temporal bone CT due to reported lower MRI positive predictive value. The value of these recommendations is unclear given that CT overestimates dehiscence due to volume averaging and that only a small proportion of patients with dehiscence on CT suffer from dehiscence syndrome. We thus evaluated final diagnoses and outcomes in patients who adhered to the recommended additional CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort observational study, performed at a multi-institution healthcare system, included consecutive temporal bone MRI reports 6/1/2021-5/31/2022 with a recommendation for additional temporal bone CT. We recorded: whether CT was performed, dehiscence present on CT, symptoms, final diagnosis, treatment decisions, and outcomes. Actionability elements (complete containing imaging modality, time frame, and rationale; unambiguous; unconditional; without multiplicity; and without alternate language) of the recommendations were extracted from a prior data set. Descriptive statistics were performed. A binomial generalized linear model was used to test the correlation of ambiguous recommendation language with recommendation adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Summarize actual data. 5109 temporal bone MRI examinations were performed and interpreted by 34 radiologists. 187/5109 reports (3.7%) included a recommendation for additional temporal bone CT including 101/5109 (2.0%) specifically for suspected superior semicircular canal dehiscence. While 22% (22/101) of these recommended examinations were performed, only 32% of these (7/22) confirmed dehiscence. Ultimately, only 1 patient was diagnosed with dehiscence syndrome and was managed conservatively. No recommendations for additional imaging (0/101) met actionable criteria and 76.2% (77/101) were ambiguous. Ambiguous recommendations had 0.54 lower, but not statistically significant, odds of being performed (95% CI: 0.19-1.6, p=0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiologist recommendations for temporal bone CT in the setting of questionable superior semicircular canal dehiscence findings on MRI appear to have negligible clinical value and thus it is likely most appropriate to report possible SSCD in the MRI report impression without recommending further imaging.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>SSCD= superior semicircular canal dehiscence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence can be detected on temporal bone MR images. Radiologists often recommend confirmation with temporal bone CT due to reported lower MRI positive predictive value. The value of these recommendations is unclear given that CT overestimates dehiscence due to volume averaging and that only a small proportion of patients with dehiscence on CT suffer from dehiscence syndrome. We thus evaluated final diagnoses and outcomes in patients who adhered to the recommended additional CT.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort observational study, performed at a multi-institution healthcare system, included consecutive temporal bone MRI reports 6/1/2021-5/31/2022 with a recommendation for additional temporal bone CT. We recorded: whether CT was performed, dehiscence present on CT, symptoms, final diagnosis, treatment decisions, and outcomes. Actionability elements (complete containing imaging modality, time frame, and rationale; unambiguous; unconditional; without multiplicity; and without alternate language) of the recommendations were extracted from a prior data set. Descriptive statistics were performed. A binomial generalized linear model was used to test the correlation of ambiguous recommendation language with recommendation adherence.

Results: Summarize actual data. 5109 temporal bone MRI examinations were performed and interpreted by 34 radiologists. 187/5109 reports (3.7%) included a recommendation for additional temporal bone CT including 101/5109 (2.0%) specifically for suspected superior semicircular canal dehiscence. While 22% (22/101) of these recommended examinations were performed, only 32% of these (7/22) confirmed dehiscence. Ultimately, only 1 patient was diagnosed with dehiscence syndrome and was managed conservatively. No recommendations for additional imaging (0/101) met actionable criteria and 76.2% (77/101) were ambiguous. Ambiguous recommendations had 0.54 lower, but not statistically significant, odds of being performed (95% CI: 0.19-1.6, p=0.25).

Conclusions: Radiologist recommendations for temporal bone CT in the setting of questionable superior semicircular canal dehiscence findings on MRI appear to have negligible clinical value and thus it is likely most appropriate to report possible SSCD in the MRI report impression without recommending further imaging.

Abbreviations: SSCD= superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MRI interpretation errors in adult patients with Medically Refractory Epilepsy. Outcomes of Radiologist Recommendations for Temporal Bone CT to Assess Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence on Temporal Bone MRI. Sex-specific association between anatomical variants of the circle of Willis and intracranial aneurysms in individuals with a familial predisposition. Susceptibility changes on preoperative acetazolamideloaded 7T MR quantitative susceptibility mapping predict post-carotid endarterectomy cerebral hyperperfusion. Meningioma: Molecular Updates from the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of CNS Tumors and Imaging Correlates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1