Susceptibility Changes on Preoperative Acetazolamide-Loaded 7T MR Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Predict Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion.

Kazuto Kimura, Yosuke Akamatsu, Kentaro Fujimoto, Ikuko Uwano, Makoto Sasaki, Shunrou Fujiwara, Masakazu Kobayashi, Takahiro Koji, Kenji Yoshida, Kazunori Terasaki, Kuniaki Ogasawara
{"title":"Susceptibility Changes on Preoperative Acetazolamide-Loaded 7T MR Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Predict Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion.","authors":"Kazuto Kimura, Yosuke Akamatsu, Kentaro Fujimoto, Ikuko Uwano, Makoto Sasaki, Shunrou Fujiwara, Masakazu Kobayashi, Takahiro Koji, Kenji Yoshida, Kazunori Terasaki, Kuniaki Ogasawara","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) cerebral hyperperfusion (CH) can cause intracerebral hemorrhage and cognitive decline. Alterations in susceptibility in response to acetazolamide (ACZ) on 7T MRI quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) detect elevated CBV occurring due to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation. We explored preoperative relative susceptibility changes on 7T MRI QSM in response to ACZ and their ability to predict CH following CEA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients with uni- or bilateral cervical ICA stenosis of ≥70% underwent 7T MRI at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after ACZ administration before surgery. The difference between the susceptibility of venous structures and surrounding brain parenchyma at each time point after ACZ administration relative to the difference at baseline (relative susceptibility difference [RSD]) on QSM images was calculated in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the surgery site. Brain perfusion SPECT was conducted preoperatively and immediately following CEA to detect postoperative CH (≥100% rise in CBF postoperatively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 9 patients with postoperative CH, the RSD was significantly increased at 5 or 10 minutes following ACZ administration (<i>P</i> < .05) but was reduced at 15 and 20 minutes (<i>P</i> < .05). In 54 patients without postoperative CH, the SD at all 4 time points after ACZ administration was significantly lower than the baseline value (<i>P</i> < .05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict postoperative CH was significantly greater in RSD<sub>5</sub> (0.981; 95% CI, 0.910-0.999) than in RSD<sub>15</sub> (0.872; 95% CI, 0.764-0.943) (<i>P</i> < .05) or RSD<sub>20</sub> (0.780; 95% CI, 0.658-0.874) (<i>P</i> < .01). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for RSD<sub>5</sub> at a cutoff near the left upper corner of the curve were 100%, 89%, 60%, and 100%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only RSD<sub>5</sub> significantly predicted postoperative CH (95% CI, 455.9-4043.6; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in susceptibility on preoperative 7T MRI QSM following ACZ administration predict CH following CEA. Patients with increased RSD<sub>5</sub> on pre-CEA 7T MRI QSM following ACZ administration should undergo brain perfusion imaging immediately after surgery. Detection of CH on postoperative brain perfusion imaging warrants intensive blood pressure control.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1579-1586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) cerebral hyperperfusion (CH) can cause intracerebral hemorrhage and cognitive decline. Alterations in susceptibility in response to acetazolamide (ACZ) on 7T MRI quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) detect elevated CBV occurring due to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation. We explored preoperative relative susceptibility changes on 7T MRI QSM in response to ACZ and their ability to predict CH following CEA.

Materials and methods: Sixty-three patients with uni- or bilateral cervical ICA stenosis of ≥70% underwent 7T MRI at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after ACZ administration before surgery. The difference between the susceptibility of venous structures and surrounding brain parenchyma at each time point after ACZ administration relative to the difference at baseline (relative susceptibility difference [RSD]) on QSM images was calculated in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the surgery site. Brain perfusion SPECT was conducted preoperatively and immediately following CEA to detect postoperative CH (≥100% rise in CBF postoperatively).

Results: In 9 patients with postoperative CH, the RSD was significantly increased at 5 or 10 minutes following ACZ administration (P < .05) but was reduced at 15 and 20 minutes (P < .05). In 54 patients without postoperative CH, the SD at all 4 time points after ACZ administration was significantly lower than the baseline value (P < .05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict postoperative CH was significantly greater in RSD5 (0.981; 95% CI, 0.910-0.999) than in RSD15 (0.872; 95% CI, 0.764-0.943) (P < .05) or RSD20 (0.780; 95% CI, 0.658-0.874) (P < .01). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for RSD5 at a cutoff near the left upper corner of the curve were 100%, 89%, 60%, and 100%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that only RSD5 significantly predicted postoperative CH (95% CI, 455.9-4043.6; P < .05).

Conclusions: Changes in susceptibility on preoperative 7T MRI QSM following ACZ administration predict CH following CEA. Patients with increased RSD5 on pre-CEA 7T MRI QSM following ACZ administration should undergo brain perfusion imaging immediately after surgery. Detection of CH on postoperative brain perfusion imaging warrants intensive blood pressure control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前乙酰唑胺负载7T MR定量敏感性图的敏感性变化预测颈动脉内膜切除术后脑过度灌注。
背景与目的:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后脑过度灌注(CH)可引起脑出血和认知能力下降。对乙酰唑胺(ACZ)的易感性改变在7T MRI定量易感性测绘(QSM)上检测到CBV升高是由于脑血管自动调节受损引起的。我们探讨了术前7T MRI QSM对ACZ的相对敏感性变化及其预测CEA后CH的能力。材料与方法:63例单侧或双侧颈椎ICA狭窄≥70%的患者,术前分别于ACZ给药后5、10、15、20分钟行7T MRI检查。ACZ给药后各时间点静脉结构及周围脑实质易感性与基线时的差异(相对易感性差异;计算与手术同侧脑半球QSM图像的RSD。术前及CEA后立即行脑灌注SPECT检测术后CH(术后CBF升高≥100%)。结果:9例术后CH患者,ACZ给药后5、10 min RSD显著升高(p < 0.05), 15、20 min RSD降低(p < 0.05)。在54例术后无CH的患者中,ACZ给药后四个时间点的RSD均显著低于基线值(p < 0.05)。用于预测术后CH的受试者工作特征曲线下面积在RSD5 (0.981;95% CI, 0.910-0.999)高于RSD15 (0.872;95% CI, 0.764-0.943) (p < 0.05)或RSD20 (0.780;95% CI, 0.658-0.874) (p < 0.01)。在曲线左上角附近的截止点,RSD5的敏感性、特异性和阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%、89%、60%和100%。Logistic回归分析显示,只有RSD5显著预测术后CH (95% CI, 455.9-4043.6;P < 0.05)。结论:ACZ给药后术前7T MRI QSM易感性变化预测CEA后CH。服用ACZ后,cea前7T MRI QSM RSD5升高的患者应在术后立即进行脑灌注成像。术后脑灌注显像检测CH需要加强血压控制。缩写:CEA=颈动脉内膜切除术;CH=脑过度灌注;OEF=氧气萃取分数;ACZ =乙酰唑胺;QSM =定量敏感性图;3 d =三维;RSD=相对敏感性差异;SD=标准差;ROC =受试者工作特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal Imaging Dynamics in ischemic Stroke: Intensity- vs. volume-based metrics. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI using Gadopiclenol for Evaluation of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume at 3T: A Comparison with Gadobutrol. Plaque-RADS and Neovascularization for Risk Stratification of Carotid Stenosis: A Bimodal Imaging Study. Associations of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Metrics with Structural and Cerebrovascular Disease Imaging Metrics in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. A Comparative Evaluation of 7T MRI for Epilepsy with Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction and Dynamic Parallel Transmission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1