Turning Up the Heat: More Persistent Precipitation Regimes Weaken the Micro-Climate Buffering Capacity of Forage Grasses During a Hot Summer

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70078
Simon Reynaert, Ivan Nijs, Tommy D'Hose, Erik Verbruggen, Jutte Callaerts, Hans J. De Boeck
{"title":"Turning Up the Heat: More Persistent Precipitation Regimes Weaken the Micro-Climate Buffering Capacity of Forage Grasses During a Hot Summer","authors":"Simon Reynaert,&nbsp;Ivan Nijs,&nbsp;Tommy D'Hose,&nbsp;Erik Verbruggen,&nbsp;Jutte Callaerts,&nbsp;Hans J. De Boeck","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Developing climate-proof forage grasslands does not only require developing plant communities that are soil drought resistant, but also adept at buffering elevated atmospheric temperatures to minimize heat stress for plant and soil. Previous studies indicate that the emerging trend towards rainfall regimes with longer dry and wet spells negatively affects forage grass performance (i.e., greater physiological plant stress and yield loss) in Western Europe. We conducted a 120-day open-air experiment testing whether a hot summer (+3°C for the first 60 days) exacerbates the negative effects of increased persistence in precipitation regimes (PR) (3 vs. 30 days consecutive wet/dry) on the performance of four distinct forage varieties (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i>, <i>Festuca arundinacea</i>, <i>Lolium perenne</i> (tetraploid) and <i>Lolium perenne</i> (diploid)) across two soils differing in management history (permanent vs. temporary grasslands). Our results indicate that climate warming indeed worsens negative effects of more persistent PR on forage grass productivity and physiological plant stress by inducing more extreme soil drought and elevated micro-climatic temperatures, but permanent grassland soils with elevated organic carbon can buffer yields. Moreover, higher yielding varieties are more proficient at buffering soil surface and canopy temperatures and maintaining plant greenness and stomatal opening under water shortage and elevated temperatures (<i>Dactylis</i> and <i>Festuca</i>) were impacted less than those which could not (both <i>Lolium</i> cultivars). These results indicate that not only differences in resource-extraction traits but also the ability of a species to buffer its surrounding microclimatic conditions shapes its response to future climate change. Given the indirect positive effects such temperature-buffering traits may have on soil functioning (e.g., reduced soil respiration during heat waves limiting carbon loss), we argue that managers should also incorporate such traits when developing climate-proof forage grasslands.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing climate-proof forage grasslands does not only require developing plant communities that are soil drought resistant, but also adept at buffering elevated atmospheric temperatures to minimize heat stress for plant and soil. Previous studies indicate that the emerging trend towards rainfall regimes with longer dry and wet spells negatively affects forage grass performance (i.e., greater physiological plant stress and yield loss) in Western Europe. We conducted a 120-day open-air experiment testing whether a hot summer (+3°C for the first 60 days) exacerbates the negative effects of increased persistence in precipitation regimes (PR) (3 vs. 30 days consecutive wet/dry) on the performance of four distinct forage varieties (Dactylis glomerata, Festuca arundinacea, Lolium perenne (tetraploid) and Lolium perenne (diploid)) across two soils differing in management history (permanent vs. temporary grasslands). Our results indicate that climate warming indeed worsens negative effects of more persistent PR on forage grass productivity and physiological plant stress by inducing more extreme soil drought and elevated micro-climatic temperatures, but permanent grassland soils with elevated organic carbon can buffer yields. Moreover, higher yielding varieties are more proficient at buffering soil surface and canopy temperatures and maintaining plant greenness and stomatal opening under water shortage and elevated temperatures (Dactylis and Festuca) were impacted less than those which could not (both Lolium cultivars). These results indicate that not only differences in resource-extraction traits but also the ability of a species to buffer its surrounding microclimatic conditions shapes its response to future climate change. Given the indirect positive effects such temperature-buffering traits may have on soil functioning (e.g., reduced soil respiration during heat waves limiting carbon loss), we argue that managers should also incorporate such traits when developing climate-proof forage grasslands.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在炎热的夏季,更持久的降水制度削弱了牧草的小气候缓冲能力
发展抗气候饲草草地不仅需要发展土壤抗旱的植物群落,而且还需要善于缓冲升高的大气温度,以尽量减少植物和土壤的热应激。先前的研究表明,在西欧,出现了更长干湿期降雨制度的新趋势,对牧草的生产性能产生了负面影响(即,更大的植物生理压力和产量损失)。我们进行了一项为期120天的露天试验,测试炎热的夏季(前60天+3°C)是否会加剧降水制度(PR)(连续3天和30天的湿/干)对四种不同牧草品种(鸭茅、羊茅、多年生黑麦草(四倍体)和多年生黑麦草(二倍体))在两种不同管理历史的土壤(永久草地和临时草地)的生产性能的负面影响。研究结果表明,气候变暖确实加剧了持续PR对牧草生产力和植物生理胁迫的负面影响,导致土壤极端干旱和小气候温度升高,但有机碳含量升高的永久草地土壤可以缓冲产量。此外,高产品种在缺水和高温条件下缓冲土壤表面和冠层温度、维持植物绿度和气孔开度的能力较强(Dactylis和Festuca),受到的影响较小(这两个品种都是Lolium)。这些结果表明,不仅资源提取特征的差异,而且物种缓冲周围小气候条件的能力也决定了其对未来气候变化的响应。鉴于这种温度缓冲特性可能对土壤功能产生间接的积极影响(例如,在热浪期间减少土壤呼吸,限制碳损失),我们认为管理者在开发气候防护草甸时也应该考虑到这些特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
Drought Reduces Formation, but Enhances Persistence, of Mineral-Associated Organic Matter in a Grassland Soil. Freshwater Conservation Priority Areas Are Threatened by Global Mining Activities. Europe's Ecological Debt: Mapping Freshwater Restoration Needs. Nitrate Availability Modulates the Temperature Sensitivity of N2O and N2 Production From Denitrification. Signals From the Southern Edge: Demographic Effects of Ocean Warming on Two Cold-Adapted Seabird Species in the Gulf of Maine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1