A bilevel optimization approach for Balancing Markets with electric vehicle aggregators and smart charging

IF 1.8 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IFAC Journal of Systems and Control Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100296
Daniel Fernández Valderrama, Giulio Ferro, Luca Parodi, Michela Robba
{"title":"A bilevel optimization approach for Balancing Markets with electric vehicle aggregators and smart charging","authors":"Daniel Fernández Valderrama,&nbsp;Giulio Ferro,&nbsp;Luca Parodi,&nbsp;Michela Robba","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Demand Response (DR) programs can help alleviate the management of the electrical distribution grid by reducing loads in specified areas. They can be enabled within the energy Balancing Market (BM). Aggregators can manage different customers providing flexibility. Recently, Electric Vehicles Aggregators (EVAs) have emerged as significant players in the BM because they can manage fleets of electric vehicles (EVs) in the distribution grid. This paper addresses a multi-objective optimization problem for a distribution power grid that includes EVs and smart charging parks. At the higher level, the Distribution System Operator (DSO) considers the characteristics of each BM actor to minimize costs. Meanwhile, EVAs focus on controlling EV charging at the lower level to maximize their profit. The optimization problems of EVAs and other actors are replaced by KKT (Karush–Kuhn–Tucker)​ conditions, which are embedded as constraints in the DSO decision problem. Moreover, the resulting bilinear terms (in the optimization problem constraints) are linearized to fasten the finding of an optimal solution. The overall optimization problem is a mixed-integer quadratic programming (MIQP) and has been applied to the IEEE 13-bus test benchmark. The results demonstrate a reduction of about 6% of power loss in the grid achieved by the developed model. Besides, the linearized model can afford a more discretized model due to the reduction of computational effort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29926,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601825000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demand Response (DR) programs can help alleviate the management of the electrical distribution grid by reducing loads in specified areas. They can be enabled within the energy Balancing Market (BM). Aggregators can manage different customers providing flexibility. Recently, Electric Vehicles Aggregators (EVAs) have emerged as significant players in the BM because they can manage fleets of electric vehicles (EVs) in the distribution grid. This paper addresses a multi-objective optimization problem for a distribution power grid that includes EVs and smart charging parks. At the higher level, the Distribution System Operator (DSO) considers the characteristics of each BM actor to minimize costs. Meanwhile, EVAs focus on controlling EV charging at the lower level to maximize their profit. The optimization problems of EVAs and other actors are replaced by KKT (Karush–Kuhn–Tucker)​ conditions, which are embedded as constraints in the DSO decision problem. Moreover, the resulting bilinear terms (in the optimization problem constraints) are linearized to fasten the finding of an optimal solution. The overall optimization problem is a mixed-integer quadratic programming (MIQP) and has been applied to the IEEE 13-bus test benchmark. The results demonstrate a reduction of about 6% of power loss in the grid achieved by the developed model. Besides, the linearized model can afford a more discretized model due to the reduction of computational effort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Local vs regional neural air pollution forecasting models A top-down approach for climate change mitigation strategies A bilevel optimization approach for Balancing Markets with electric vehicle aggregators and smart charging New approach of series-PID controller design based on modern control theory: Simulations and real-time validation A Control-Equivalent-Turbulence-Input estimation method for unmanned helicopters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1