Incorporation of travel and confinement time in the evaluation of nuclear medicine therapy discharge criteria

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104922
Fabrizio Banci Buonamici , Rita Borgheresi , Annamaria Didona , Silvia Bettarini , Ilaria Cupparo , Eleonora Vanzi
{"title":"Incorporation of travel and confinement time in the evaluation of nuclear medicine therapy discharge criteria","authors":"Fabrizio Banci Buonamici ,&nbsp;Rita Borgheresi ,&nbsp;Annamaria Didona ,&nbsp;Silvia Bettarini ,&nbsp;Ilaria Cupparo ,&nbsp;Eleonora Vanzi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>A novel method for calculating the dose absorbed by third parties in contact with patients after nuclear medicine treatment is presented. In literature, studies assume a confinement period in which patients have no contacts and whose duration is determined by comparing the dose absorbed after confinement with dose constraints. However, complete isolation is often impractical and the dose during confinement should be considered. Furthermore, dose to third parties should be relevant in case of long return trips and this contribution should also be accounted for.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The calculation model we propose, based on continuous exposure with correction for time and distance, allows evaluation of the above-mentioned dose contributions and can be easily implemented in a spreadsheet. The model was validated against published data under equivalent exposure scenarios and then applied to evaluate additional doses due to travel and restriction period exposures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neglecting dose contribution during the confinement period, results are consistent with those published in literature. In this approximation, it is always possible to meet dose constraints, however, if dose during confinement is considered, it may be impossible to comply with the required constraints. Furthermore, long return trips, especially using public transportation, may require postponing travel for several days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ignoring the dose during the restriction period or long trips can lead to the incorrect conclusion that a constraint is met when it is not. Anyhow, a constraint should be considered as an aid to optimization, and not as a dose limit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A novel method for calculating the dose absorbed by third parties in contact with patients after nuclear medicine treatment is presented. In literature, studies assume a confinement period in which patients have no contacts and whose duration is determined by comparing the dose absorbed after confinement with dose constraints. However, complete isolation is often impractical and the dose during confinement should be considered. Furthermore, dose to third parties should be relevant in case of long return trips and this contribution should also be accounted for.

Method

The calculation model we propose, based on continuous exposure with correction for time and distance, allows evaluation of the above-mentioned dose contributions and can be easily implemented in a spreadsheet. The model was validated against published data under equivalent exposure scenarios and then applied to evaluate additional doses due to travel and restriction period exposures.

Results

Neglecting dose contribution during the confinement period, results are consistent with those published in literature. In this approximation, it is always possible to meet dose constraints, however, if dose during confinement is considered, it may be impossible to comply with the required constraints. Furthermore, long return trips, especially using public transportation, may require postponing travel for several days.

Conclusion

ignoring the dose during the restriction period or long trips can lead to the incorrect conclusion that a constraint is met when it is not. Anyhow, a constraint should be considered as an aid to optimization, and not as a dose limit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将旅行和坐月子时间纳入核医学治疗出院标准评价
目的提出一种计算核医学治疗后与患者接触的第三方吸收剂量的新方法。在文献中,研究假设一个禁闭期,在此期间患者没有接触,其持续时间是通过比较禁闭后吸收的剂量和剂量限制来确定的。然而,完全隔离往往是不切实际的,应考虑禁闭期间的剂量。此外,在长途往返的情况下,对第三方的剂量也应考虑在内,这一贡献也应考虑在内。方法提出的基于时间和距离校正的连续照射计算模型可以对上述剂量贡献进行评估,并易于在电子表格中实现。在等效暴露情景下,根据已发表的数据验证了该模型,然后应用于评估由于旅行和限制期暴露造成的额外剂量。结果忽略禁闭期的剂量贡献,结果与文献一致。在这种近似中,总是有可能满足剂量限制,然而,如果考虑禁闭期间的剂量,则可能不可能满足所要求的限制。此外,长途往返,特别是乘坐公共交通工具,可能需要推迟几天旅行。结论在限制期或长途旅行中忽略剂量会导致不符合限制的情况下误以为达到了限制。无论如何,约束应该被认为是对优化的辅助,而不是剂量限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Simulating respiratory liver motion: Development and evaluation of a deformable phantom for radiotherapy testing Impact of applicator curvature in contact interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for skin cancer: exploring the “Nautilus Effect” Assessing the validity of simulation-based sensitivity analysis for patient-specific quality assurance devices Expert variability as a benchmark for validating automatic CT–MRI registration in brain stereotactic radiosurgery A fully 3D-printed contoured double passive scattering system for ultra-high-dose-rate irradiations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1