Jacob Pellinen , Stefan Sillau , Chris Morrison , Paul Maruff , Terence J. O’Brien , Patricia Penovich , Jacqueline French , Kelly G. Knupp , Sarah Barnard , Manisha Holmes , Manu Hegde , Andres M. Kanner , Kimford J. Meador , the Human Epilepsy Project Investigators
{"title":"Cognitive function at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance","authors":"Jacob Pellinen , Stefan Sillau , Chris Morrison , Paul Maruff , Terence J. O’Brien , Patricia Penovich , Jacqueline French , Kelly G. Knupp , Sarah Barnard , Manisha Holmes , Manu Hegde , Andres M. Kanner , Kimford J. Meador , the Human Epilepsy Project Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Seizures can impact cognition both acutely and chronically. However, among those without significant comorbidities and broadly average cognition at epilepsy onset, the relationship between cognitive function at the time of diagnosis and long-term seizure control has been relatively unexplored. This analysis investigated associations between participant characteristics including specific aspects of cognitive performance at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis and antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment resistance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) data, which enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and broadly average cognition (estimated IQ ≥ 70) from June 29, 2012, to September 1, 2019. Participants analyzed in this study were between 18 and 60 years old, and scored within an acceptable range (i.e., Standard Score of ≥80) on measures estimating premorbid cognitive ability were offered the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). Participant characteristics were analyzed, including the presence of any anxiety disorders or depression, and summary CBB scores. HEP participants who were classified by the study as treatment resistant if they had experienced failure to achieve seizure freedom after two adequate trials of ASMs. Treatment resistance was modeled using multiple logistic regression to assess for independent associations between attention and working memory after correcting for the presence of the other potentially explanatory variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>200 HEP participants had comprehensive enrollment records including CBB results and complete seizure outcome data for analysis in this study. After correcting for potentially confounding variables, there were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and subsequent development of ASM treatment resistance. Specifically, z-scores for reaction time on the CBB (an average of the CBB Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.51) and z-scores for memory performance (an average of the CBB One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.24). There were no significant independent associations between age or the presence of depression or anxiety disorders at the time of CBB testing and treatment resistance. However, there was an independent association between employment status and treatment resistance, with those who were employed or students (>18 years old) at the time of enrollment and CBB testing having 0.35 times lower odds of treatment resistance (95 %CI 0.15–0.81, p = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The findings from this study suggest that in otherwise healthy people with new onset focal epilepsy who have broadly average intelligence, attention and working memory as measured by the CBB at the time of diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance. Although performance on cognitive testing at epilepsy onset may not be predictive of risk of treatment resistance in this population, other individual characteristics such as employment status at the time of diagnosis may be indirect markers of long-term seizure outcomes and require further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 110293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Seizures can impact cognition both acutely and chronically. However, among those without significant comorbidities and broadly average cognition at epilepsy onset, the relationship between cognitive function at the time of diagnosis and long-term seizure control has been relatively unexplored. This analysis investigated associations between participant characteristics including specific aspects of cognitive performance at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis and antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment resistance.
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) data, which enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and broadly average cognition (estimated IQ ≥ 70) from June 29, 2012, to September 1, 2019. Participants analyzed in this study were between 18 and 60 years old, and scored within an acceptable range (i.e., Standard Score of ≥80) on measures estimating premorbid cognitive ability were offered the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). Participant characteristics were analyzed, including the presence of any anxiety disorders or depression, and summary CBB scores. HEP participants who were classified by the study as treatment resistant if they had experienced failure to achieve seizure freedom after two adequate trials of ASMs. Treatment resistance was modeled using multiple logistic regression to assess for independent associations between attention and working memory after correcting for the presence of the other potentially explanatory variables.
Results
200 HEP participants had comprehensive enrollment records including CBB results and complete seizure outcome data for analysis in this study. After correcting for potentially confounding variables, there were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and subsequent development of ASM treatment resistance. Specifically, z-scores for reaction time on the CBB (an average of the CBB Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.51) and z-scores for memory performance (an average of the CBB One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.24). There were no significant independent associations between age or the presence of depression or anxiety disorders at the time of CBB testing and treatment resistance. However, there was an independent association between employment status and treatment resistance, with those who were employed or students (>18 years old) at the time of enrollment and CBB testing having 0.35 times lower odds of treatment resistance (95 %CI 0.15–0.81, p = 0.01).
Significance
The findings from this study suggest that in otherwise healthy people with new onset focal epilepsy who have broadly average intelligence, attention and working memory as measured by the CBB at the time of diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance. Although performance on cognitive testing at epilepsy onset may not be predictive of risk of treatment resistance in this population, other individual characteristics such as employment status at the time of diagnosis may be indirect markers of long-term seizure outcomes and require further investigation.
目的癫痫可对认知产生急性和慢性影响。然而,在那些没有明显合并症和癫痫发作时认知能力大致平均的患者中,诊断时认知功能与长期癫痫控制之间的关系相对未被探索。本分析调查了局灶性癫痫诊断时认知表现的特定方面与抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗抵抗性之间的关联。方法对人类癫痫项目(HEP)数据进行二次分析,纳入2012年6月29日至2019年9月1日期间新诊断为局灶性癫痫且认知能力一般(估计智商≥70)的患者。本研究分析的参与者年龄在18至60岁之间,并且在估计发病前认知能力的措施上得分在可接受范围内(即标准得分≥80),并提供认知状态简短电池(CBB)。分析参与者的特征,包括任何焦虑症或抑郁症的存在,以及CBB的总结得分。HEP参与者被研究归类为治疗抵抗,如果他们经历了两次充分的asm试验后未能实现癫痫发作自由。在校正了其他潜在解释变量的存在后,使用多重逻辑回归模型来评估注意力和工作记忆之间的独立关联。结果200名HEP参与者有全面的入组记录,包括CBB结果和完整的癫痫发作结局数据,用于本研究的分析。在校正了潜在的混杂变量后,在入组时CBB的认知测量与随后的ASM治疗抵抗之间没有独立的关联。具体来说,CBB反应时间的z-得分(CBB识别和检测测试的平均值)与治疗抵抗无关(p = 0.51),记忆表现的z-得分(CBB一张学习测试和一次背测试的平均值)与治疗抵抗无关(p = 0.24)。在进行CBB测试时,年龄或抑郁或焦虑障碍的存在与治疗抵抗之间没有显著的独立关联。然而,就业状况与治疗抵抗之间存在独立的关联,在入组和CBB测试时,就业者或学生(18岁)的治疗抵抗几率低0.35倍(95% CI 0.15-0.81, p = 0.01)。本研究的结果表明,在新发局灶性癫痫患者中,在诊断时CBB测量的智力、注意力和工作记忆大致平均的健康人群与治疗抵抗无关。虽然癫痫发作时的认知测试表现可能不能预测该人群的治疗抵抗风险,但其他个体特征,如诊断时的就业状况,可能是长期癫痫发作结果的间接标志,需要进一步调查。
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.