Alexandra Eid , Christina Kallik , Radwa Aly , Ya-Huei Li , Noor Taweh , Anumeha Sheth
{"title":"Seizure Cycle app: A feasibility study","authors":"Alexandra Eid , Christina Kallik , Radwa Aly , Ya-Huei Li , Noor Taweh , Anumeha Sheth","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Catamenial seizure exacerbation (CSE) is challenging to track given unreliable patient reports. This highlights the need for improved recognition of CSE. In this study, we discuss the feasibility of using the <em>Seizure Cycle</em> app for that purpose.</div></div><div><h3>Design/methods</h3><div>Eligible participants logged menstrual cycles and seizure data in the app for 6 months. CSE was defined based on criteria by Herzog et al <span><span>[1]</span></span>, as two-fold increase in average daily seizure frequency (ADSF) during menstrual (C1) and ovulatory (C2) phases during ovulatory cycles, and the entire luteal phase during anovulatory cycles (C3). Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of participants who completed 4-month and 6-month documentation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 8 participants, 5 (62.5 %) shared > 4-month data and 4 (50 %) shared 6-month data. Among the 6 participants who shared at least one month of data, CSE type C3 was identified based on number of seizures in one participant who had variable cycle length and was presumed to have anovulatory cycles. This was not confirmed with calculation of ADSF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><em>Seizure Cycle</em> app can serve as a feasible tool to improve diagnosis of this underrecognized condition. Despite the small sample size, CSE was potentially identified in one participant, although use of ADSF did not confirm this classification. Clearer definition of the C3 pattern may be useful. Future work will prioritize app automation to streamline data collection, facilitating larger and more robust datasets. These advancements will ultimately support the systematic assessment of therapeutic interventions to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CSE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 110305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
Catamenial seizure exacerbation (CSE) is challenging to track given unreliable patient reports. This highlights the need for improved recognition of CSE. In this study, we discuss the feasibility of using the Seizure Cycle app for that purpose.
Design/methods
Eligible participants logged menstrual cycles and seizure data in the app for 6 months. CSE was defined based on criteria by Herzog et al [1], as two-fold increase in average daily seizure frequency (ADSF) during menstrual (C1) and ovulatory (C2) phases during ovulatory cycles, and the entire luteal phase during anovulatory cycles (C3). Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of participants who completed 4-month and 6-month documentation.
Results
Among 8 participants, 5 (62.5 %) shared > 4-month data and 4 (50 %) shared 6-month data. Among the 6 participants who shared at least one month of data, CSE type C3 was identified based on number of seizures in one participant who had variable cycle length and was presumed to have anovulatory cycles. This was not confirmed with calculation of ADSF.
Conclusions
Seizure Cycle app can serve as a feasible tool to improve diagnosis of this underrecognized condition. Despite the small sample size, CSE was potentially identified in one participant, although use of ADSF did not confirm this classification. Clearer definition of the C3 pattern may be useful. Future work will prioritize app automation to streamline data collection, facilitating larger and more robust datasets. These advancements will ultimately support the systematic assessment of therapeutic interventions to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CSE.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.