Seizure Cycle app: A feasibility study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110305
Alexandra Eid , Christina Kallik , Radwa Aly , Ya-Huei Li , Noor Taweh , Anumeha Sheth
{"title":"Seizure Cycle app: A feasibility study","authors":"Alexandra Eid ,&nbsp;Christina Kallik ,&nbsp;Radwa Aly ,&nbsp;Ya-Huei Li ,&nbsp;Noor Taweh ,&nbsp;Anumeha Sheth","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Catamenial seizure exacerbation (CSE) is challenging to track given unreliable patient reports. This highlights the need for improved recognition of CSE. In this study, we discuss the feasibility of using the <em>Seizure Cycle</em> app for that purpose.</div></div><div><h3>Design/methods</h3><div>Eligible participants logged menstrual cycles and seizure data in the app for 6 months. CSE was defined based on criteria by Herzog et al <span><span>[1]</span></span>, as two-fold increase in average daily seizure frequency (ADSF) during menstrual (C1) and ovulatory (C2) phases during ovulatory cycles, and the entire luteal phase during anovulatory cycles (C3). Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of participants who completed 4-month and 6-month documentation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 8 participants, 5 (62.5 %) shared &gt; 4-month data and 4 (50 %) shared 6-month data. Among the 6 participants who shared at least one month of data, CSE type C3 was identified based on number of seizures in one participant who had variable cycle length and was presumed to have anovulatory cycles. This was not confirmed with calculation of ADSF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><em>Seizure Cycle</em> app can serve as a feasible tool to improve diagnosis of this underrecognized condition. Despite the small sample size, CSE was potentially identified in one participant, although use of ADSF did not confirm this classification. Clearer definition of the C3 pattern may be useful. Future work will prioritize app automation to streamline data collection, facilitating larger and more robust datasets. These advancements will ultimately support the systematic assessment of therapeutic interventions to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CSE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 110305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Catamenial seizure exacerbation (CSE) is challenging to track given unreliable patient reports. This highlights the need for improved recognition of CSE. In this study, we discuss the feasibility of using the Seizure Cycle app for that purpose.

Design/methods

Eligible participants logged menstrual cycles and seizure data in the app for 6 months. CSE was defined based on criteria by Herzog et al [1], as two-fold increase in average daily seizure frequency (ADSF) during menstrual (C1) and ovulatory (C2) phases during ovulatory cycles, and the entire luteal phase during anovulatory cycles (C3). Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of participants who completed 4-month and 6-month documentation.

Results

Among 8 participants, 5 (62.5 %) shared > 4-month data and 4 (50 %) shared 6-month data. Among the 6 participants who shared at least one month of data, CSE type C3 was identified based on number of seizures in one participant who had variable cycle length and was presumed to have anovulatory cycles. This was not confirmed with calculation of ADSF.

Conclusions

Seizure Cycle app can serve as a feasible tool to improve diagnosis of this underrecognized condition. Despite the small sample size, CSE was potentially identified in one participant, although use of ADSF did not confirm this classification. Clearer definition of the C3 pattern may be useful. Future work will prioritize app automation to streamline data collection, facilitating larger and more robust datasets. These advancements will ultimately support the systematic assessment of therapeutic interventions to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CSE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
The non-invasive brain or nerve stimulation treatment did not increase seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy: A network meta-analysis Seizure Cycle app: A feasibility study Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder in caregivers of children with epilepsy: A meta-analysis Changes in anxiety after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cognitive function at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1