Heat and mass transfer in heated concrete: evaluation and validation of five numerical models

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1617/s11527-024-02532-6
Benedikt Weber, Colin T. Davie, Alain Millard, Jiayi Wang, Dorjan Dauti, Yiming Zhang, Jean-Christophe Mindeguia, Matthias Zeiml, Stefano Dal Pont, Francesco Pesavento
{"title":"Heat and mass transfer in heated concrete: evaluation and validation of five numerical models","authors":"Benedikt Weber,&nbsp;Colin T. Davie,&nbsp;Alain Millard,&nbsp;Jiayi Wang,&nbsp;Dorjan Dauti,&nbsp;Yiming Zhang,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Mindeguia,&nbsp;Matthias Zeiml,&nbsp;Stefano Dal Pont,&nbsp;Francesco Pesavento","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02532-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Modeling concrete at elevated temperatures is essential to understanding the behavior of structural elements during fire, particularly with respect to spalling. To accurately predict temperatures and pore pressures, models must be validated against experimental data. However, most models in the literature focus on replicating experimental outcomes and often rely on input parameters sourced from the literature or determined by empirical tuning. To explore this further, a study of five models was conducted as part of the activities of the RILEM Technical Committee 256-SPF. On the theoretical side, state-of-the-art formulations are reviewed and similarities and differences between implementations are discussed. Using input parameters from various test reports, simulations of temperatures and pore pressures were performed and compared with test results for two types of concrete. While all of the models gave satisfactory results, they did so only when permeability values were applied that were significantly lower than those obtained from the standard tests. Since this trend was consistent across all models, it suggests that the permeability of concrete under heating conditions differs from that measured in standard material tests. As noted by some researchers, gas permeability in concrete is altered by the presence of water, probably due to swelling and rehydration. Identifying an accurate permeability value for these conditions remains an open research challenge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02532-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modeling concrete at elevated temperatures is essential to understanding the behavior of structural elements during fire, particularly with respect to spalling. To accurately predict temperatures and pore pressures, models must be validated against experimental data. However, most models in the literature focus on replicating experimental outcomes and often rely on input parameters sourced from the literature or determined by empirical tuning. To explore this further, a study of five models was conducted as part of the activities of the RILEM Technical Committee 256-SPF. On the theoretical side, state-of-the-art formulations are reviewed and similarities and differences between implementations are discussed. Using input parameters from various test reports, simulations of temperatures and pore pressures were performed and compared with test results for two types of concrete. While all of the models gave satisfactory results, they did so only when permeability values were applied that were significantly lower than those obtained from the standard tests. Since this trend was consistent across all models, it suggests that the permeability of concrete under heating conditions differs from that measured in standard material tests. As noted by some researchers, gas permeability in concrete is altered by the presence of water, probably due to swelling and rehydration. Identifying an accurate permeability value for these conditions remains an open research challenge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
期刊最新文献
Heat and mass transfer in heated concrete: evaluation and validation of five numerical models Characterization of physicochemical composition of asphalt/aggregate and multi-scale analysis of interfacial adhesion behavior How shearing affects air dissolution in fresh cement pastes under pressure State-of-the-art on impact and explosion behaviour of concrete structures: report of RILEM TC 288-IEC Validation of the linear amplitude sweep as accelerated fatigue protocol for damage resistance estimation of asphalt binder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1