Mary D Carmody, Abby L Schultz, Kristen A Berg, Brooke W Bullington, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita Shah Arora
{"title":"Association Between Comorbidities and Inpatient Postpartum Permanent Contraception Completion.","authors":"Mary D Carmody, Abby L Schultz, Kristen A Berg, Brooke W Bullington, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita Shah Arora","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether comorbidities (defined as both medical conditions and peripartum complications) are associated with inpatient postpartum permanent contraception by tubal surgery completion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a multisite retrospective cohort study of patients who had documented plans for permanent contraception. Our primary outcome was inpatient completion of postpartum permanent contraception by tubal surgery. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine associations between aggregate and individual comorbidities and the attainment of inpatient postpartum permanent contraception.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 2,226 pregnant people, 53.4% of patients received postpartum permanent contraception by the time of hospital discharge, and 70.8% of patients had documented comorbidities. Although patients with medical conditions initially had lower odds of permanent contraception completion compared with those without any comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI, 0.64-0.93), this association was no longer significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (adjusted P=.06). This association also was not significant for patients with peripartum complications (aOR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, adjusted P=.42). Similarly, when individual comorbidities were assessed, patients with hypertension (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65-0.97, adjusted P=.06), mental health diagnoses (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.66-0.96, adjusted P=.06), and elevated body mass index (BMI, 40 or higher) (aOR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.63-0.95, adjusted P=.06) had no significant differences in odds of immediate permanent contraception attainment after adjusting for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the balance of risks and benefits is imperative for surgical care, it is imperative that modifiable barriers to desired permanent contraception are mitigated. There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient postpartum permanent contraception attainment for patients with medical conditions in our study; however, further study is needed to better elucidate the complex relationships between medical comorbidities and contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether comorbidities (defined as both medical conditions and peripartum complications) are associated with inpatient postpartum permanent contraception by tubal surgery completion.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multisite retrospective cohort study of patients who had documented plans for permanent contraception. Our primary outcome was inpatient completion of postpartum permanent contraception by tubal surgery. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine associations between aggregate and individual comorbidities and the attainment of inpatient postpartum permanent contraception.
Results: In this study of 2,226 pregnant people, 53.4% of patients received postpartum permanent contraception by the time of hospital discharge, and 70.8% of patients had documented comorbidities. Although patients with medical conditions initially had lower odds of permanent contraception completion compared with those without any comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI, 0.64-0.93), this association was no longer significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (adjusted P=.06). This association also was not significant for patients with peripartum complications (aOR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, adjusted P=.42). Similarly, when individual comorbidities were assessed, patients with hypertension (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65-0.97, adjusted P=.06), mental health diagnoses (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.66-0.96, adjusted P=.06), and elevated body mass index (BMI, 40 or higher) (aOR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.63-0.95, adjusted P=.06) had no significant differences in odds of immediate permanent contraception attainment after adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Conclusions: Though the balance of risks and benefits is imperative for surgical care, it is imperative that modifiable barriers to desired permanent contraception are mitigated. There were no statistically significant differences in inpatient postpartum permanent contraception attainment for patients with medical conditions in our study; however, further study is needed to better elucidate the complex relationships between medical comorbidities and contraception.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.