Pregnancy-Related Mortality in California Due to Obstetric Hemorrhage.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005847
Paula Krakowiak, Christine H Morton, Christy McCain, Dan Sun, Deepika Mathur, Alexander J Butwick, Neeru Gupta, Malini A Nijagal, Amanda Williams, Marla Seacrist, Laurence E Shields, Carolina Reyes, Miranda Klassen, Elizabeth Yznaga, Elliott K Main
{"title":"Pregnancy-Related Mortality in California Due to Obstetric Hemorrhage.","authors":"Paula Krakowiak, Christine H Morton, Christy McCain, Dan Sun, Deepika Mathur, Alexander J Butwick, Neeru Gupta, Malini A Nijagal, Amanda Williams, Marla Seacrist, Laurence E Shields, Carolina Reyes, Miranda Klassen, Elizabeth Yznaga, Elliott K Main","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify underlying causes, contributing factors, and quality-improvement opportunities of pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The California Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review examined pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths in California that occurred in 2014-2018. Data were abstracted from multiple sources (vital records, hospital encounter data, medical records, and coroner or autopsy reports). A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed all case summaries. Data from reviews were aggregated to determine underlying causes of death, preventability, contributing factors, and quality-improvement opportunities at the patient, clinician, facility, and system levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 2,409,732 live births and 49 pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths. Placenta accreta spectrum accounted for 16 (32.7%) of deaths; intra-abdominal bleeding and uterine atony each accounted for 10 deaths (20.4%). Compared with the California birth population, a significantly higher proportion of women who died were born in China (14.3% vs 3.9%); were 35 years of age or older (49.0% vs 21.9%); had two or more prior births (57.4% vs 29.1%); had cesarean deliveries (74.4% vs 31.8%); or delivered at hospitals with fewer than 1,200 births per year (33.3% vs 12.2%) (all P<.05). The committee determined that 63.3% of all hemorrhage deaths were highly preventable with substantial variation by cause. Clinician-, facility-, and system-level contributing factors were noted in 88.9% of cases and included delayed response or escalation (77.8%), delayed recognition (72.2%), and insufficient quantities of blood products used (52.8%). Corresponding quality-improvement opportunities included timely hemorrhage risk assessment; increased vigilance for identifying signs and symptoms of hemorrhage; escalation of care and aggressive management; preparation for hemorrhage complications and ongoing training for all hospitals, particularly low-resource facilities; and adherence to severe hemorrhage protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Obstetric hemorrhage remains a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality and has multiple causes with various levels of preventability. Optimizing system-based approaches for hemorrhage preparedness, detection, and clinical management is critical to reduce preventable deaths from hemorrhage, especially among patients who do not respond to first-line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005847","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify underlying causes, contributing factors, and quality-improvement opportunities of pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths.

Methods: The California Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review examined pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths in California that occurred in 2014-2018. Data were abstracted from multiple sources (vital records, hospital encounter data, medical records, and coroner or autopsy reports). A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed all case summaries. Data from reviews were aggregated to determine underlying causes of death, preventability, contributing factors, and quality-improvement opportunities at the patient, clinician, facility, and system levels.

Results: During the study period, there were 2,409,732 live births and 49 pregnancy-related hemorrhage deaths. Placenta accreta spectrum accounted for 16 (32.7%) of deaths; intra-abdominal bleeding and uterine atony each accounted for 10 deaths (20.4%). Compared with the California birth population, a significantly higher proportion of women who died were born in China (14.3% vs 3.9%); were 35 years of age or older (49.0% vs 21.9%); had two or more prior births (57.4% vs 29.1%); had cesarean deliveries (74.4% vs 31.8%); or delivered at hospitals with fewer than 1,200 births per year (33.3% vs 12.2%) (all P<.05). The committee determined that 63.3% of all hemorrhage deaths were highly preventable with substantial variation by cause. Clinician-, facility-, and system-level contributing factors were noted in 88.9% of cases and included delayed response or escalation (77.8%), delayed recognition (72.2%), and insufficient quantities of blood products used (52.8%). Corresponding quality-improvement opportunities included timely hemorrhage risk assessment; increased vigilance for identifying signs and symptoms of hemorrhage; escalation of care and aggressive management; preparation for hemorrhage complications and ongoing training for all hospitals, particularly low-resource facilities; and adherence to severe hemorrhage protocols.

Conclusion: Obstetric hemorrhage remains a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality and has multiple causes with various levels of preventability. Optimizing system-based approaches for hemorrhage preparedness, detection, and clinical management is critical to reduce preventable deaths from hemorrhage, especially among patients who do not respond to first-line treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
Pregnancy-Related Mortality in California Due to Obstetric Hemorrhage. Primary Care Utilization Within 1 Year After a Facilitated Postpartum-to-Primary Care Transition. Association Between Comorbidities and Inpatient Postpartum Permanent Contraception Completion. Diagnosis and Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome During Pregnancy. Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder After Prior Non-Cesarean Delivery Uterine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1