Predicting Extranodal Extension with Preoperative Contrast-enhanced CT in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiology. Imaging cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1148/rycan.240127
Ryan T Hughes, Christopher M Lack, Jeffrey R Sachs, Kevin D Hiatt, Sydney Smith, Cole R Steber, Fatima Z Aly, Ralph B D'Agostino, Paul M Bunch
{"title":"Predicting Extranodal Extension with Preoperative Contrast-enhanced CT in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Ryan T Hughes, Christopher M Lack, Jeffrey R Sachs, Kevin D Hiatt, Sydney Smith, Cole R Steber, Fatima Z Aly, Ralph B D'Agostino, Paul M Bunch","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop a practical, easily implementable risk stratification model based on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) nodal features to predict the probability of pathologic extranodal extension (pENE) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Materials and Methods Preoperative CECT studies in consecutive patients with OPSCC who underwent surgical resection between October 2012 and October 2020 were examined by four neuroradiologists, blinded to the pathologic outcome, for imaging features of pENE. The pathology report was queried for the presence of pENE. Decision tree analysis with cost-complexity pruning was performed to identify a clinically pragmatic model to predict pENE. Results A total of 162 patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 54-67 years]; 134 male, 28 female) with 208 dissected heminecks were included. The primary OPSCC site for most patients was tonsil (67%, 109 of 162) or base of tongue (31%, 50 of 162). Most patients had early-stage disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual eighth edition category T0-T2, 93% [151 of 162]; N0-N1, 90% [145 of 162]). Pathologically confirmed pENE was reported in 28% (45 of 162) of patients. CECT features that were significantly associated with pENE on univariable analysis included size, necrosis, spiculation, perinodal stranding, and infiltration of adjacent structures. Decision tree analysis identified a predictive model including spiculation or irregular margins, matted nodes, and infiltration of adjacent structures. The model had a sensitivity of 41% (19 of 46) and specificity of 96% (157 of 162) for predicting pENE. Conclusion The developed model for predicting pENE using preoperative CECT features is practical and had high specificity in patients with OPSCC. Further prospective study is warranted to determine impact on clinical management and outcomes. <b>Keywords:</b> Head/Neck, CT, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Neoplasms-Primary, Oncology, Decision Analysis, Observer Performance <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 2","pages":"e240127"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To develop a practical, easily implementable risk stratification model based on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) nodal features to predict the probability of pathologic extranodal extension (pENE) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Materials and Methods Preoperative CECT studies in consecutive patients with OPSCC who underwent surgical resection between October 2012 and October 2020 were examined by four neuroradiologists, blinded to the pathologic outcome, for imaging features of pENE. The pathology report was queried for the presence of pENE. Decision tree analysis with cost-complexity pruning was performed to identify a clinically pragmatic model to predict pENE. Results A total of 162 patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 54-67 years]; 134 male, 28 female) with 208 dissected heminecks were included. The primary OPSCC site for most patients was tonsil (67%, 109 of 162) or base of tongue (31%, 50 of 162). Most patients had early-stage disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual eighth edition category T0-T2, 93% [151 of 162]; N0-N1, 90% [145 of 162]). Pathologically confirmed pENE was reported in 28% (45 of 162) of patients. CECT features that were significantly associated with pENE on univariable analysis included size, necrosis, spiculation, perinodal stranding, and infiltration of adjacent structures. Decision tree analysis identified a predictive model including spiculation or irregular margins, matted nodes, and infiltration of adjacent structures. The model had a sensitivity of 41% (19 of 46) and specificity of 96% (157 of 162) for predicting pENE. Conclusion The developed model for predicting pENE using preoperative CECT features is practical and had high specificity in patients with OPSCC. Further prospective study is warranted to determine impact on clinical management and outcomes. Keywords: Head/Neck, CT, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Neoplasms-Primary, Oncology, Decision Analysis, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting Extranodal Extension with Preoperative Contrast-enhanced CT in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cinematic Rendering of Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor. Nodule-in-Nodule Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clinical and Imaging Predictors of False-Positive and False-Negative Results in Prostate Multiparametric MRI Using PI-RADS Version 2. Tumor Biomechanics Quantified Using MR Elastography to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Individuals with Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1