Correlation of 3T Diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Liver Metastases: SUV Versus ADC.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.4274/mirt.galenos.2024.37431
Ahmet Tanyeri, Rıdvan Akbulut, Emir Hüseyin Nevai, Yakup Yürekli
{"title":"Correlation of 3T Diffusion-weighted MRI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT in Liver Metastases: SUV Versus ADC.","authors":"Ahmet Tanyeri, Rıdvan Akbulut, Emir Hüseyin Nevai, Yakup Yürekli","doi":"10.4274/mirt.galenos.2024.37431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used in the diagnosis and follow-up of liver metastases. Both modalities provide anatomical and functional information and have advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV) values in metastatic liver lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) scans performed between April 2021 and 2024 using the 3T MR scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-three patients with liver metastases, less than one month between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET/CT, no treatment during this period, and lesions larger than 1 cm were included in the study. In each MRI scan, an index lesion was selected for ADC measurement. The radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist measured the same index lesion without the patient being informed of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 33 patients was 59±12 years, with 17 (51%) men and 16 (49%) women. The mean size of the index lesions was 27±9 mm. In MRI, mean ADC<sub>min</sub>: (0.54±0.2) ×10<sup>-3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s; ADC<sub>mean</sub>: (1.02±0.2) ×10<sup>-3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s; ADC<sub>max</sub>: (1.48±0.44) ×10<sup>-3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>/s; and region of interest area was calculated as 6±4.6 cm<sup>2</sup>. In PET/CT, mean SUV<sub>mean</sub>: 5.8±3.3; SUV<sub>peak</sub>: 6.8±4.3; SUV<sub>max</sub>: 10.7±5.6; and metabolic tumor volume: 12.1 (7.4-20.7) cm<sup>3</sup>. No statistically significant correlation was found between ADC and SUV values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no correlation between ADC and SUV values in liver metastases. Prospective studies with a large patient group are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44681,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","volume":"34 1","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2024.37431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used in the diagnosis and follow-up of liver metastases. Both modalities provide anatomical and functional information and have advantages and disadvantages. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV) values in metastatic liver lesions.

Methods: Abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) scans performed between April 2021 and 2024 using the 3T MR scanner were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-three patients with liver metastases, less than one month between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PET/CT, no treatment during this period, and lesions larger than 1 cm were included in the study. In each MRI scan, an index lesion was selected for ADC measurement. The radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist measured the same index lesion without the patient being informed of the results.

Results: The mean age of the 33 patients was 59±12 years, with 17 (51%) men and 16 (49%) women. The mean size of the index lesions was 27±9 mm. In MRI, mean ADCmin: (0.54±0.2) ×10-3mm2/s; ADCmean: (1.02±0.2) ×10-3mm2/s; ADCmax: (1.48±0.44) ×10-3mm2/s; and region of interest area was calculated as 6±4.6 cm2. In PET/CT, mean SUVmean: 5.8±3.3; SUVpeak: 6.8±4.3; SUVmax: 10.7±5.6; and metabolic tumor volume: 12.1 (7.4-20.7) cm3. No statistically significant correlation was found between ADC and SUV values.

Conclusion: There was no correlation between ADC and SUV values in liver metastases. Prospective studies with a large patient group are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy
Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy (Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther, MIRT) is publishes original research articles, invited reviews, editorials, short communications, letters, consensus statements, guidelines and case reports with a literature review on the topic, in the field of molecular imaging, multimodality imaging, nuclear medicine, radionuclide therapy, radiopharmacy, medical physics, dosimetry and radiobiology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of 68Ga-FAPi PET/CT on Staging or Restaging Digestive System Tumors in Patients with Negative or Equivocal 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings. Improved Accuracy and Reliability of PRIMARY Scoring Using Delayed [68Ga] Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging. A Different Scintigraphic Perspective on the Systolic Function of the Left Ventricle-1. A Rare Case of Synchronous Lobular Breast Carcinoma and Serous Psammocarcinoma of the Ovary Evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Correlation of 3T Diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Liver Metastases: SUV Versus ADC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1