Effect of the deposition strategy and endogenous defect pattern on the plastic deformability and the fracture mechanism of 316L stainless steel obtained using material extrusion

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109395
Sergio Lorenzi , Gianluca D’Urso , Lorenzo Nani , Mariangela Quarto , Stephanie Fest-Santini , Tommaso Pastore
{"title":"Effect of the deposition strategy and endogenous defect pattern on the plastic deformability and the fracture mechanism of 316L stainless steel obtained using material extrusion","authors":"Sergio Lorenzi ,&nbsp;Gianluca D’Urso ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Nani ,&nbsp;Mariangela Quarto ,&nbsp;Stephanie Fest-Santini ,&nbsp;Tommaso Pastore","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the metal additive manufacturing (MAM) scenario, metal-polymer-based systems such as material extrusion (MEX) and binder jetting (BJ) are gaining increasing interest as they are expected to provide production cost savings alongside increased productivity compared with well-established powder bed fusion (PBF) and direct energy deposition (DED) technologies. However, metal-polymer-based systems are multistep processes characterized by internal porosity which is strictly dependent on the adopted manufacturing technology in terms of size, shape and distribution. This study examined the impact of such endogenous defects on the tensile behavior of 316L stainless steel manufactured with two different deposition strategies, i.e. the conventional ± 45° and an experimental strategy borrowed from PBF processes, that consists of 67° rotation of each layer<em>,</em> namely <em>k</em>67°. The microstructure consisted mostly of equiaxed austenitic grains with segregation of δ-ferrite at the grain boundaries in all the studied conditions, as expected. The overall volumetric porosity was close to 2 % for both deposition strategies, but the morphology of macro-defects was significantly different. The distribution of defects assessed using micro computational tomography (micro-CT) showed a periodic, stacked, and continuous macro-defect pattern for ± 45° strategy, whereas a more distributed, fragmented and discontinuous pattern was observed for the <em>k</em>67° strategy. The tensile tests curves highlighted a broad and homogeneous plastic deformation without any noteworthy evidence of necking. The fracture morphologies were characterized by a preferential fracture propagation path driven by porosity pile-up for both infill strategies. This resulted in higher deformations at break for the <em>k</em>67° strategy specimens than for the conventional ± 45°. The δ-ferrite regions found at the austenitic grain boundaries functioned as preferential sites for crack initiation, while propagation was almost ductile in bulk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 109395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the metal additive manufacturing (MAM) scenario, metal-polymer-based systems such as material extrusion (MEX) and binder jetting (BJ) are gaining increasing interest as they are expected to provide production cost savings alongside increased productivity compared with well-established powder bed fusion (PBF) and direct energy deposition (DED) technologies. However, metal-polymer-based systems are multistep processes characterized by internal porosity which is strictly dependent on the adopted manufacturing technology in terms of size, shape and distribution. This study examined the impact of such endogenous defects on the tensile behavior of 316L stainless steel manufactured with two different deposition strategies, i.e. the conventional ± 45° and an experimental strategy borrowed from PBF processes, that consists of 67° rotation of each layer, namely k67°. The microstructure consisted mostly of equiaxed austenitic grains with segregation of δ-ferrite at the grain boundaries in all the studied conditions, as expected. The overall volumetric porosity was close to 2 % for both deposition strategies, but the morphology of macro-defects was significantly different. The distribution of defects assessed using micro computational tomography (micro-CT) showed a periodic, stacked, and continuous macro-defect pattern for ± 45° strategy, whereas a more distributed, fragmented and discontinuous pattern was observed for the k67° strategy. The tensile tests curves highlighted a broad and homogeneous plastic deformation without any noteworthy evidence of necking. The fracture morphologies were characterized by a preferential fracture propagation path driven by porosity pile-up for both infill strategies. This resulted in higher deformations at break for the k67° strategy specimens than for the conventional ± 45°. The δ-ferrite regions found at the austenitic grain boundaries functioned as preferential sites for crack initiation, while propagation was almost ductile in bulk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on the failure characteristics of the loess high slope under the coupled effects of soil Consolidation, Rainfall, and evaporation Effect of the deposition strategy and endogenous defect pattern on the plastic deformability and the fracture mechanism of 316L stainless steel obtained using material extrusion Failure analysis of compression-after-impact of CFF/PEEK thermoplastic composites subjected to double-position impact based on DIC and Micro-CT techniques Tensile deformation and fracture behavior at high temperature of the TLP joint for Hastelloy X superalloy with laminated interlayer An experimental study on the multi-way valve for ensuring durability under temperature conditions in the automotive environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1