IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2-Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3573
Susan Richards, Insa Winzenborg, Doreen Luedtke, Tao Niu, Lora Hamuro, Karey Kowalski, Jocelyn H Leu, Jianning Yang, Vaishnavi Ganti, Indranil Bhattacharya, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Nael Mostafa, Christine Grimaldi, Benjamin Wu
{"title":"IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2-Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment.","authors":"Susan Richards, Insa Winzenborg, Doreen Luedtke, Tao Niu, Lora Hamuro, Karey Kowalski, Jocelyn H Leu, Jianning Yang, Vaishnavi Ganti, Indranil Bhattacharya, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Nael Mostafa, Christine Grimaldi, Benjamin Wu","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All biotherapeutics have the potential to induce an immunogenic response and generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. However, a clinically meaningful effect of ADAs can be difficult to identify to communicate the impact of immunogenicity on drug exposure, safety and efficacy outcomes in product labels in a way that is useful for health care providers. The immunogenicity working Group, IQ Consortium (Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group) has conducted a survey to understand the current practices in analyzing immunogenicity data generated during clinical development and its impact on pharmacokinetics, clinically relevant pharmacodynamic biomarkers, safety, and efficacy outcome measures. Information was collected for 93 drugs, spanning multiple drug classes and over the different phases of clinical development, including post-approval. The predominant drug classes reported included monoclonal antibodies or Fc-fusion proteins, endogenous protein replacement therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. The extent of quantitative evaluation varied and was influenced by several factors, including descriptive analyses, statistical approaches, and modeling. In addition to understanding current practices, this survey also highlights areas for future exploration in analyzing clinical relevance of ADAs which can facilitate the use for regulatory submissions and product labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All biotherapeutics have the potential to induce an immunogenic response and generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. However, a clinically meaningful effect of ADAs can be difficult to identify to communicate the impact of immunogenicity on drug exposure, safety and efficacy outcomes in product labels in a way that is useful for health care providers. The immunogenicity working Group, IQ Consortium (Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group) has conducted a survey to understand the current practices in analyzing immunogenicity data generated during clinical development and its impact on pharmacokinetics, clinically relevant pharmacodynamic biomarkers, safety, and efficacy outcome measures. Information was collected for 93 drugs, spanning multiple drug classes and over the different phases of clinical development, including post-approval. The predominant drug classes reported included monoclonal antibodies or Fc-fusion proteins, endogenous protein replacement therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. The extent of quantitative evaluation varied and was influenced by several factors, including descriptive analyses, statistical approaches, and modeling. In addition to understanding current practices, this survey also highlights areas for future exploration in analyzing clinical relevance of ADAs which can facilitate the use for regulatory submissions and product labels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Model-Informed Selection of the Recommended Phase 2 Dosage for Anti-TIGIT Immunotherapy Leveraging co-Expressed PD-1 Inhibitor Target Engagement. IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2-Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment. Model-Based Prediction of Clinically Relevant Thrombocytopenia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy in aNSCLC: A Norwegian Population-Based Cohort Study. The Role and Mechanisms of Aurora Kinases in Kidney Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1