IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2—Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3573
Susan Richards, Insa Winzenborg, Doreen Luedtke, Tao Niu, Lora Hamuro, Karey Kowalski, Jocelyn H. Leu, Jianning Yang, Vaishnavi Ganti, Indranil Bhattacharya, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Nael Mostafa, Christine Grimaldi, Benjamin Wu
{"title":"IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2—Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment","authors":"Susan Richards,&nbsp;Insa Winzenborg,&nbsp;Doreen Luedtke,&nbsp;Tao Niu,&nbsp;Lora Hamuro,&nbsp;Karey Kowalski,&nbsp;Jocelyn H. Leu,&nbsp;Jianning Yang,&nbsp;Vaishnavi Ganti,&nbsp;Indranil Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Ivelina Gueorguieva,&nbsp;Nael Mostafa,&nbsp;Christine Grimaldi,&nbsp;Benjamin Wu","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>All biotherapeutics have the potential to induce an immunogenic response and generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. However, a clinically meaningful effect of ADAs can be difficult to identify to communicate the impact of immunogenicity on drug exposure, safety and efficacy outcomes in product labels in a way that is useful for health care providers. The immunogenicity working Group, IQ Consortium (Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group) has conducted a survey to understand the current practices in analyzing immunogenicity data generated during clinical development and its impact on pharmacokinetics, clinically relevant pharmacodynamic biomarkers, safety, and efficacy outcome measures. Information was collected for 93 drugs, spanning multiple drug classes and over the different phases of clinical development, including post-approval. The predominant drug classes reported included monoclonal antibodies or Fc-fusion proteins, endogenous protein replacement therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates. The extent of quantitative evaluation varied and was influenced by several factors, including descriptive analyses, statistical approaches, and modeling. In addition to understanding current practices, this survey also highlights areas for future exploration in analyzing clinical relevance of ADAs which can facilitate the use for regulatory submissions and product labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"117 6","pages":"1605-1613"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.3573","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All biotherapeutics have the potential to induce an immunogenic response and generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. However, a clinically meaningful effect of ADAs can be difficult to identify to communicate the impact of immunogenicity on drug exposure, safety and efficacy outcomes in product labels in a way that is useful for health care providers. The immunogenicity working Group, IQ Consortium (Clinical Pharmacology Leadership Group) has conducted a survey to understand the current practices in analyzing immunogenicity data generated during clinical development and its impact on pharmacokinetics, clinically relevant pharmacodynamic biomarkers, safety, and efficacy outcome measures. Information was collected for 93 drugs, spanning multiple drug classes and over the different phases of clinical development, including post-approval. The predominant drug classes reported included monoclonal antibodies or Fc-fusion proteins, endogenous protein replacement therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates. The extent of quantitative evaluation varied and was influenced by several factors, including descriptive analyses, statistical approaches, and modeling. In addition to understanding current practices, this survey also highlights areas for future exploration in analyzing clinical relevance of ADAs which can facilitate the use for regulatory submissions and product labels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前工业实践的IQ调查结果:第二部分免疫原性评价的定量评价。
所有生物治疗药物都有可能诱发免疫原性反应并产生抗药物抗体(ADAs),特别是在长时间多次给药时。然而,ADAs的临床有意义的作用可能难以确定,以一种对卫生保健提供者有用的方式在产品标签上传达免疫原性对药物暴露、安全性和有效性结果的影响。IQ联盟(临床药理学领导小组)免疫原性工作组进行了一项调查,以了解目前在分析临床开发过程中产生的免疫原性数据及其对药代动力学、临床相关药效学生物标志物、安全性和有效性结果测量的影响。收集了93种药物的信息,涵盖多个药物类别和临床开发的不同阶段,包括批准后。报告的主要药物类别包括单克隆抗体或fc融合蛋白,内源性蛋白质替代疗法,双特异性抗体和抗体-药物偶联物。定量评价的程度各不相同,并受到几个因素的影响,包括描述性分析、统计方法和建模。除了了解当前的实践,该调查还强调了未来在分析ADAs临床相关性方面的探索领域,这些领域可以促进监管提交和产品标签的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
ASCPT Annual Meeting Abstracts: Advancing Pharmacoequity. NLP in Support of Pharmacovigilance: QUality Adverse Drug Reaction AcTIve Control (QUADRATIC). Reframing the "Rescue Window": From Physiological Upper Bounds to Actionable Thresholds. Population Pharmacokinetics of Dupilumab in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Integrating Patient Engagement into Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics: Bringing the Patient Voice into Data-Driven Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1