The resurgence of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists as adulterants in the Era of Cannabis legalization: Lessons from prior epidemics and clinical implications
Austin T. Jones , Alaa Marwan Abu Taha , Grover P. Miller
{"title":"The resurgence of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists as adulterants in the Era of Cannabis legalization: Lessons from prior epidemics and clinical implications","authors":"Austin T. Jones , Alaa Marwan Abu Taha , Grover P. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Momentum towards legalization of medical and recreational cannabis drives a convergence between natural cannabinoids and their synthetic counterparts, creating new clinical challenges in a second wave of exposures. This review critically examines the emerging challenges posed by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) and semi-synthetic cannabinoids, emphasizing their clinical implications. SCRAs are potent full agonist activity that have been identified as adulterants in several recreational substances, including cannabis and opioids. Adulteration often leads to unpredictable clinical outcomes and exacerbates the potential for drug interactions. Drawing parallels with other drug epidemics, this paper highlights the urgent need for clinical preparedness to address the nuanced presentations of cannabinoid toxicity, stressing the importance of patient history, physical examination, and judicious use of supportive laboratory tests. This review serves as a cautionary tale and call to action for researchers and policymakers. There is a clear need for robust quality control measures, enhanced public awareness campaigns, and development of evidence-based clinical guidelines to mitigate the health risks associated with intentional and unintentional use of synthetic cannabinoids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 106043"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425000430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Momentum towards legalization of medical and recreational cannabis drives a convergence between natural cannabinoids and their synthetic counterparts, creating new clinical challenges in a second wave of exposures. This review critically examines the emerging challenges posed by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) and semi-synthetic cannabinoids, emphasizing their clinical implications. SCRAs are potent full agonist activity that have been identified as adulterants in several recreational substances, including cannabis and opioids. Adulteration often leads to unpredictable clinical outcomes and exacerbates the potential for drug interactions. Drawing parallels with other drug epidemics, this paper highlights the urgent need for clinical preparedness to address the nuanced presentations of cannabinoid toxicity, stressing the importance of patient history, physical examination, and judicious use of supportive laboratory tests. This review serves as a cautionary tale and call to action for researchers and policymakers. There is a clear need for robust quality control measures, enhanced public awareness campaigns, and development of evidence-based clinical guidelines to mitigate the health risks associated with intentional and unintentional use of synthetic cannabinoids.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.