Evaluating retrofitting and operational efficiency of automobile air conditioners using environmentally-friendly refrigerants

IF 6.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125874
Yi-Jia Wei , Tun-Ping Teng
{"title":"Evaluating retrofitting and operational efficiency of automobile air conditioners using environmentally-friendly refrigerants","authors":"Yi-Jia Wei ,&nbsp;Tun-Ping Teng","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated two low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants as direct replacements for R134a in automotive air conditioners (AACs) to meet international environmental protection standards. R152a and R1234yf were substituted with 75 % (300 g) and 110 % (440 g) of the R134a filling capacity (400 g) for AACs, respectively. Additionally, operating efficiency tests of AACs with various refrigerants were conducted under different outdoor ambient temperatures (<em>T<sub>oa, DB</sub></em>: 30, 35, and 40°C) and compressor speeds (1000 and 1800 rpm) while maintaining fixed indoor conditions. The results indicated that the performance metrics, including compression ratio, cooling capacity, electrical power consumption (<em>P<sub>c</sub></em>), and energy efficiency ratio (<em>EER</em>), were superior for AACs using R152a compared to those using R134a across all experimental conditions. When performing performance tests at <em>T<sub>oa, DB</sub></em> of 35 °C, and a compressor speed of 1800 rpm, the <em>P<sub>c</sub></em> for R152a and R1234yf were 5.96 % and 5.04 % lower than those of the original AAC. The <em>EER</em> values were 11.26 % and 1.45 % higher than those of the original AAC. Furthermore, the total equivalent warming impact (<em>TEWI</em>) of R152a is better than that of R1234yf when the daily driving duration exceeds 4.9 h. This suggests that R152a offers both energy-saving and environmental protection effects when used in AACs for extended driving periods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 125874"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135943112500465X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated two low global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants as direct replacements for R134a in automotive air conditioners (AACs) to meet international environmental protection standards. R152a and R1234yf were substituted with 75 % (300 g) and 110 % (440 g) of the R134a filling capacity (400 g) for AACs, respectively. Additionally, operating efficiency tests of AACs with various refrigerants were conducted under different outdoor ambient temperatures (Toa, DB: 30, 35, and 40°C) and compressor speeds (1000 and 1800 rpm) while maintaining fixed indoor conditions. The results indicated that the performance metrics, including compression ratio, cooling capacity, electrical power consumption (Pc), and energy efficiency ratio (EER), were superior for AACs using R152a compared to those using R134a across all experimental conditions. When performing performance tests at Toa, DB of 35 °C, and a compressor speed of 1800 rpm, the Pc for R152a and R1234yf were 5.96 % and 5.04 % lower than those of the original AAC. The EER values were 11.26 % and 1.45 % higher than those of the original AAC. Furthermore, the total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) of R152a is better than that of R1234yf when the daily driving duration exceeds 4.9 h. This suggests that R152a offers both energy-saving and environmental protection effects when used in AACs for extended driving periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估使用环保制冷剂的汽车空调的改造和运行效率
本研究评估了两种低全球变暖潜能值(GWP)制冷剂作为汽车空调(aac)中R134a的直接替代品,以满足国际环保标准。R152a和R1234yf分别用R134a填充量(400 g)的75% (300 g)和110% (440 g)代替AACs。此外,在保持固定室内条件下,在不同的室外环境温度(Toa、DB: 30、35和40℃)和压缩机转速(1000和1800 rpm)下,对不同制冷剂的aac进行了运行效率测试。结果表明,在所有实验条件下,使用R152a的aac的性能指标,包括压缩比、制冷量、电功率消耗(Pc)和能效比(EER),都优于使用R134a的aac。在Toa、DB为35℃、压缩机转速为1800 rpm的条件下进行性能测试时,R152a和R1234yf的Pc比原AAC分别降低了5.96%和5.04%。EER值分别比原AAC高11.26%和1.45%。此外,R152a的总等效变暖影响(TEWI)在日行驶时间超过4.9 h时优于R1234yf,说明R152a在aac中使用较长行驶时间具有节能和环保的双重效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Study on the upstream chamber pressure characteristics of an intake-adjustable rotating detonation combustor under different initial intake area adjustment positions Quantification of snow insulation effect on the thermal energy budget in sub-Arctic embankment Experimental evaluation of thermal performance of an indirect liquid-cooled battery module Mitigating high return water temperatures in CO₂ heat pumps for legacy district heating networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1