Impact of Population-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes Among 67-Year-Olds Using Point-of-Care HbA1c on Healthcare Ultilisation, Results from the VISP Cohort.

IF 3.4 2区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S487825

Jesper Winkler Andersen, Annette Høgh, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Rikke Søgaard, Henrik Støvring, Knud Bonnet Yderstræde, Annelli Sandbæk, Marie Dahl

{"title":"Impact of Population-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes Among 67-Year-Olds Using Point-of-Care HbA1c on Healthcare Ultilisation, Results from the VISP Cohort.","authors":"Jesper Winkler Andersen, Annette Høgh, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Rikke Søgaard, Henrik Støvring, Knud Bonnet Yderstræde, Annelli Sandbæk, Marie Dahl","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S487825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the changes in healthcare utilization following population-based screening for diabetes mellitus (DM) using point-of-care HbA1c measurement in the Viborg Screening Program (VISP) cohort, which invites all 67-year-olds in Viborg, Denmark, for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and DM screening.Patients and methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from VISP and Danish national health registers. The study included 2386 individuals invited to VISP from August 1, 2014, to May 31, 2017. Exclusion criteria were non-attenders, those with prior DM, and those with missing HbA1c measurements. Pre- and post-screening healthcare utilization was analyzed, stratified by HbA1c levels: <42 mmol/mol (normal), 42-48 mmol/mol (pre-DM), and ≥48 mmol/mol (DM). Statistical analyses were performed using Poisson and logistic regression models to compare ratios of healthcare utilization before and after screening.Results: Of the participants, 16.5% had pre-DM, and 3.4% had DM. Screening resulted in increased general physician contacts across all HbA1c groups, the highest increase was seen in the DM group with a pre- vs post-screening odds ratio [OR] of 3.25 (95% CI: 1.06-9.95) and a relative odds ratio [ROR] of 2.70 (0.87-8.39). Also, in this group, the OR for having ≥1 HbA1c measurement one year pre- vs post-screening was 5.56 (2.77 -11.14) and 26.8% (17.6-37.9) started glucose-lowering treatment within two years post-screening. Despite expectations, healthcare utilization did not decrease among those with normal HbA1c levels.Conclusion: Population-based screening for DM and CVD among 67-year-olds resulted in increased healthcare utilization, particularly among those with screen-detected DM and pre-DM. The anticipated reduction in healthcare utilization among individuals with normal HbA1c levels was not observed. These findings highlight the potential for screening to enhance disease management and underscore the need for strategies to optimize healthcare resource use following screening, especially for individuals without DM.Trial registration: NCT03395509.","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S487825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the changes in healthcare utilization following population-based screening for diabetes mellitus (DM) using point-of-care HbA1c measurement in the Viborg Screening Program (VISP) cohort, which invites all 67-year-olds in Viborg, Denmark, for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and DM screening.

Patients and methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from VISP and Danish national health registers. The study included 2386 individuals invited to VISP from August 1, 2014, to May 31, 2017. Exclusion criteria were non-attenders, those with prior DM, and those with missing HbA1c measurements. Pre- and post-screening healthcare utilization was analyzed, stratified by HbA1c levels: <42 mmol/mol (normal), 42-48 mmol/mol (pre-DM), and ≥48 mmol/mol (DM). Statistical analyses were performed using Poisson and logistic regression models to compare ratios of healthcare utilization before and after screening.

Results: Of the participants, 16.5% had pre-DM, and 3.4% had DM. Screening resulted in increased general physician contacts across all HbA1c groups, the highest increase was seen in the DM group with a pre- vs post-screening odds ratio [OR] of 3.25 (95% CI: 1.06-9.95) and a relative odds ratio [ROR] of 2.70 (0.87-8.39). Also, in this group, the OR for having ≥1 HbA1c measurement one year pre- vs post-screening was 5.56 (2.77 -11.14) and 26.8% (17.6-37.9) started glucose-lowering treatment within two years post-screening. Despite expectations, healthcare utilization did not decrease among those with normal HbA1c levels.

Conclusion: Population-based screening for DM and CVD among 67-year-olds resulted in increased healthcare utilization, particularly among those with screen-detected DM and pre-DM. The anticipated reduction in healthcare utilization among individuals with normal HbA1c levels was not observed. These findings highlight the potential for screening to enhance disease management and underscore the need for strategies to optimize healthcare resource use following screening, especially for individuals without DM.

Trial registration: NCT03395509.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Epidemiology Medicine-Epidemiology

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.10%

发文量

169

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews. Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews. When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes. The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.