A Study on the Line of Sight to Galaxies Detected at Gamma-Ray Energies

Amy Furniss, Josepf N. Amador, Olivier Hervet, Ollie Jackson and David A. Williams
{"title":"A Study on the Line of Sight to Galaxies Detected at Gamma-Ray Energies","authors":"Amy Furniss, Josepf N. Amador, Olivier Hervet, Ollie Jackson and David A. Williams","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/adae9d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The large-scale universal structure comprises strands of dark matter and galaxies with large underdense volumes known as voids. We measure the fraction of the line of sight that intersects voids for active galactic nuclei (AGN) detected by Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) and quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). This “voidiness” fraction is a rudimentary proxy for the density along the line of sight to the galaxies. The voidiness of SDSS-observed quasars (QSOs) is distinctly different from randomly distributed source populations, with a median p-value of 4.6 × 10−5 and ≪1 × 10−7, when compared with 500 simulated populations with randomly simulated locations but matching redshifts in the 0.1 ≤ z < 0.4 and 0.4 ≤ z < 0.7 intervals, respectively. A similar comparison of the voidiness for LAT-detected AGN shows median p-values greater than 0.05 in each redshift interval. When comparing the SDSS QSO population to the LAT-detected AGN, we mitigate potential bias from a relationship between redshift and voidiness by comparing the LAT-detected AGN to a “redshift-matched” set of SDSS QSOs. The LAT-detected AGN between a redshift of 0.4 and 0.7 show higher voidiness compared to the redshift-matched SDSS QSO populations, with a median p-value of 2.3 × 10−5 (a 4.1σ deviation). No deviation is found when comparing the same populations between redshifts of 0.1 and 0.4 (p > 0.05). We do not study possible causes of this voidiness difference. It might relate to propagation effects from lower magnetic or radiative background fields within voids or to an environment more favorable for gamma-ray production for AGN near voids.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adae9d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large-scale universal structure comprises strands of dark matter and galaxies with large underdense volumes known as voids. We measure the fraction of the line of sight that intersects voids for active galactic nuclei (AGN) detected by Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) and quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). This “voidiness” fraction is a rudimentary proxy for the density along the line of sight to the galaxies. The voidiness of SDSS-observed quasars (QSOs) is distinctly different from randomly distributed source populations, with a median p-value of 4.6 × 10−5 and ≪1 × 10−7, when compared with 500 simulated populations with randomly simulated locations but matching redshifts in the 0.1 ≤ z < 0.4 and 0.4 ≤ z < 0.7 intervals, respectively. A similar comparison of the voidiness for LAT-detected AGN shows median p-values greater than 0.05 in each redshift interval. When comparing the SDSS QSO population to the LAT-detected AGN, we mitigate potential bias from a relationship between redshift and voidiness by comparing the LAT-detected AGN to a “redshift-matched” set of SDSS QSOs. The LAT-detected AGN between a redshift of 0.4 and 0.7 show higher voidiness compared to the redshift-matched SDSS QSO populations, with a median p-value of 2.3 × 10−5 (a 4.1σ deviation). No deviation is found when comparing the same populations between redshifts of 0.1 and 0.4 (p > 0.05). We do not study possible causes of this voidiness difference. It might relate to propagation effects from lower magnetic or radiative background fields within voids or to an environment more favorable for gamma-ray production for AGN near voids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伽玛射线能量探测星系的视线研究
大尺度的宇宙结构由暗物质链和具有大量低密度体积的星系组成,这些体积被称为空洞。我们测量了费米大面积望远镜(LAT)探测到的活动星系核(AGN)和斯隆数字巡天(SDSS)探测到的类星体相交空洞的视线比例。这个“空度”分数是星系视线上密度的基本代表。sdss观测到的类星体(qso)的空洞度与随机分布的类星体种群明显不同,与500个随机分布的类星体种群相比,它们的p值中位数为4.6 × 10 - 5和≪1 × 10 - 7,但红移的匹配区间分别为0.1≤z < 0.4和0.4≤z < 0.7。类似地,对lata检测到的AGN的空度进行比较显示,每个红移区间的中位数p值大于0.05。当将SDSS QSO群体与lata检测到的AGN进行比较时,我们通过将lata检测到的AGN与SDSS QSO的“红移匹配”集进行比较,减轻了红移和空洞之间关系的潜在偏差。与红移匹配的SDSS QSO群体相比,lata检测到的AGN在0.4和0.7之间表现出更高的空洞度,p值中位数为2.3 × 10−5 (4.1σ偏差)。当比较红移为0.1和0.4的相同种群时,没有发现偏差(p > 0.05)。我们不研究这种空度差异的可能原因。这可能与空洞内较低磁场或辐射背景场的传播效应有关,也可能与空洞附近AGN更有利于伽马射线产生的环境有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ubiquitous Small-scale Dynamics in the Slow Solar Wind Formation Region Observed by Proba-3/ASPIICS Tidal Disruption Events with SPH-EXA: Resolving the Return of the Stream An Excited Dark Matter Solution to the MeV Galactic Center Excesses CH3OH and HCN in Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Mapped with the ALMA Atacama Compact Array: Distinct Outgassing Behaviors and a Remarkably High CH3OH/HCN Production Rate Ratio Stellar Cores Live Long and Prosper in Cuspy Dark Matter Halos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1