A framework of success factors and barriers for urban car reduction in European cities

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.007
Johannes C.T. van der Lee, Wijnand W. Veeneman
{"title":"A framework of success factors and barriers for urban car reduction in European cities","authors":"Johannes C.T. van der Lee,&nbsp;Wijnand W. Veeneman","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cars and roads have helped create modern society. However, their use comes at a cost for cities and their residents, in particular with respect to liveability. To improve liveability, cities are implementing a wide range of measures. This paper addresses the challenges cities face in reducing urban car dependency and provides lessons from their experiences. Major research gaps exist around governance questions regarding real-world policy development to aid in the transition towards sustainable mobility.</div><div>Case studies in cities with comparable population sizes and experience in car-reducing measures, namely Copenhagen, Barcelona, Bremen, and Milan, provide new insights for policymaking, all to understand the context in which a policy can flourish and help policymakers make them more successful. These insights lead to a framework of success factors and barriers based on theory and practice for other policy makers to use.</div><div>Eight different success factors have been identified to overcome the five barriers and successfully implement their policies. Six originate from the literature and were confirmed in the case studies. The two final success factors of ‘the inarguability of schools’ and ‘the undeniability of hard evidence’, emerged from the cases.</div><div>In the cases interviewees identified and prioritised the links between these factors and barriers, and how the success factors can reduce the barriers. This research adds to the literature of real-world policy examples and includes issues of governance that policymakers may run into. The novelty is in the framework of success factors and barriers, based on the experiences of Western European cities with a comparable population size. The framework can be used by both policymakers and researchers to design and compare car-reducing policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cars and roads have helped create modern society. However, their use comes at a cost for cities and their residents, in particular with respect to liveability. To improve liveability, cities are implementing a wide range of measures. This paper addresses the challenges cities face in reducing urban car dependency and provides lessons from their experiences. Major research gaps exist around governance questions regarding real-world policy development to aid in the transition towards sustainable mobility.
Case studies in cities with comparable population sizes and experience in car-reducing measures, namely Copenhagen, Barcelona, Bremen, and Milan, provide new insights for policymaking, all to understand the context in which a policy can flourish and help policymakers make them more successful. These insights lead to a framework of success factors and barriers based on theory and practice for other policy makers to use.
Eight different success factors have been identified to overcome the five barriers and successfully implement their policies. Six originate from the literature and were confirmed in the case studies. The two final success factors of ‘the inarguability of schools’ and ‘the undeniability of hard evidence’, emerged from the cases.
In the cases interviewees identified and prioritised the links between these factors and barriers, and how the success factors can reduce the barriers. This research adds to the literature of real-world policy examples and includes issues of governance that policymakers may run into. The novelty is in the framework of success factors and barriers, based on the experiences of Western European cities with a comparable population size. The framework can be used by both policymakers and researchers to design and compare car-reducing policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲城市减少城市汽车的成功因素和障碍框架
汽车和道路帮助创造了现代社会。然而,它们的使用对城市及其居民来说是有代价的,尤其是在宜居性方面。为了提高宜居性,城市正在实施一系列措施。本文阐述了城市在减少城市汽车依赖方面面临的挑战,并提供了经验教训。主要的研究差距存在于有关现实世界政策制定的治理问题,以帮助向可持续流动性过渡。哥本哈根、巴塞罗那、不来梅和米兰等人口规模和汽车减排措施经验相当的城市的案例研究,为政策制定提供了新的见解,所有这些都是为了了解政策能够蓬勃发展的背景,并帮助政策制定者使其更加成功。这些见解形成了一个基于理论和实践的成功因素和障碍框架,供其他决策者使用。已经确定了八个不同的成功因素,以克服这五个障碍并成功执行其政策。其中6项来自文献,并在案例研究中得到证实。“学校的无可辩驳性”和“确凿证据的不可否认性”这两个最终的成功因素从这些案例中脱颖而出。在这些案例中,受访者确定并优先考虑这些因素和障碍之间的联系,以及成功因素如何减少障碍。这项研究增加了现实世界政策例子的文献,包括政策制定者可能遇到的治理问题。根据人口规模相当的西欧城市的经验,其新颖之处在于成功因素和障碍的框架内。政策制定者和研究人员都可以使用这个框架来设计和比较减少汽车的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Different travel behavior between low-income and high-income minority groups A country-based well-to-wheel efficiency comparison of electric and fossil-fuelled vehicles: A comprehensive study considering fuel sources and policy implications How does urban land use and transportation spatial configuration affect carbon exacerbation and mitigation? Assessment of travel behavior dynamics among young demographic for different trip purposes of shared micro-mobility services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1