{"title":"Keeping the house clean: Women and germ theories in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century Britain","authors":"Labna Fernandez Erana","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.100980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper argues that the domestic science movement played a central role, until now underappreciated, in the dissemination and reception of germ theories. By the turn of the twentieth century, germ theories of disease causation had become widely accepted in Victorian society, and germs became part of the everyday lives of men and women. Led by women, the domestic science movement advocated for a science-based housewifery education for girls, and it incorporated the new bacteriological knowledge into primary and secondary curriculums. Reading the discourses in textbooks and lectures alongside photographic documentation of educational practices allows a better understanding of how theoretical and practical knowledge of bacteriology was developed and encountered by different audiences. Women promoters of domestic science appropriated germ theories to best serve their causes. In this article I particularly focus on the English headmistress Margaret Pillow, née Scott, whose advocacy work strongly influenced the direction of domestic science movement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51032,"journal":{"name":"Endeavour","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 100980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endeavour","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932725000031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper argues that the domestic science movement played a central role, until now underappreciated, in the dissemination and reception of germ theories. By the turn of the twentieth century, germ theories of disease causation had become widely accepted in Victorian society, and germs became part of the everyday lives of men and women. Led by women, the domestic science movement advocated for a science-based housewifery education for girls, and it incorporated the new bacteriological knowledge into primary and secondary curriculums. Reading the discourses in textbooks and lectures alongside photographic documentation of educational practices allows a better understanding of how theoretical and practical knowledge of bacteriology was developed and encountered by different audiences. Women promoters of domestic science appropriated germ theories to best serve their causes. In this article I particularly focus on the English headmistress Margaret Pillow, née Scott, whose advocacy work strongly influenced the direction of domestic science movement.
期刊介绍:
Endeavour, established in 1942, has, over its long and proud history, developed into one of the leading journals in the history and philosophy of science. Endeavour publishes high-quality articles on a wide array of scientific topics from ancient to modern, across all disciplines. It serves as a critical forum for the interdisciplinary exploration and evaluation of natural knowledge and its development throughout history. Each issue contains lavish color and black-and-white illustrations. This makes Endeavour an ideal destination for history and philosophy of science articles with a strong visual component.
Endeavour presents the history and philosophy of science in a clear and accessible manner, ensuring the journal is a valuable tool for historians, philosophers, practicing scientists, and general readers. To enable it to have the broadest coverage possible, Endeavour features four types of articles:
-Research articles are concise, fully referenced, and beautifully illustrated with high quality reproductions of the most important source material.
-In Vivo articles will illustrate the rich and numerous connections between historical and philosophical scholarship and matters of current public interest, and provide rich, readable explanations of important current events from historical and philosophical perspectives.
-Book Reviews and Commentaries provide a picture of the rapidly growing history of science discipline. Written by both established and emerging scholars, our reviews provide a vibrant overview of the latest publications and media in the history and philosophy of science.
-Lost and Found Pieces are playful and creative short essays which focus on objects, theories, tools, and methods that have been significant to science but underappreciated by collective memory.