A Bayesian meta-analysis on MRI-based radiomics for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis of lung cancer.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12880-025-01566-8
Peyman Tabnak, Zana Kargar, Mohammad Ebrahimnezhad, Zanyar HajiEsmailPoor
{"title":"A Bayesian meta-analysis on MRI-based radiomics for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis of lung cancer.","authors":"Peyman Tabnak, Zana Kargar, Mohammad Ebrahimnezhad, Zanyar HajiEsmailPoor","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01566-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic test accuracy of MRI-based radiomics studies for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis originating from lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involved a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to November 3, 2024. Eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework, assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. The RQS and QUADAS-2 tools were employed for quality assessment. A Bayesian model determined summary estimates, and statistical analysis was conducted using R and STATA software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies consisting of nine training and ten validation cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. In the training cohorts, MRI-based radiomics showed robust predictive performance for EGFR mutations in brain metastases, with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88), specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 34.17 (95% CI: 19.16-57.49). Validation cohorts confirmed strong performance, with an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-0.95), sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93), and a DOR of 31.33 (95% CI: 15.50-58.3). Subgroup analyses revealed notable trends: the T1C + T2WI sequences and 3.0 T scanners showed potential superiority, machine learning-based radiomics and manual segmentation exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy, and PyRadiomics emerged as the preferred feature extraction software.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that MRI-based radiomics holds promise for the non-invasive prediction of EGFR mutations in brain metastases of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01566-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic test accuracy of MRI-based radiomics studies for predicting EGFR mutation in brain metastasis originating from lung cancer.

Methods: This meta-analysis, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involved a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to November 3, 2024. Eligibility criteria followed the PICO framework, assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. The RQS and QUADAS-2 tools were employed for quality assessment. A Bayesian model determined summary estimates, and statistical analysis was conducted using R and STATA software.

Results: Eleven studies consisting of nine training and ten validation cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. In the training cohorts, MRI-based radiomics showed robust predictive performance for EGFR mutations in brain metastases, with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93), sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88), specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 34.17 (95% CI: 19.16-57.49). Validation cohorts confirmed strong performance, with an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-0.95), sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.93), and a DOR of 31.33 (95% CI: 15.50-58.3). Subgroup analyses revealed notable trends: the T1C + T2WI sequences and 3.0 T scanners showed potential superiority, machine learning-based radiomics and manual segmentation exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy, and PyRadiomics emerged as the preferred feature extraction software.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that MRI-based radiomics holds promise for the non-invasive prediction of EGFR mutations in brain metastases of lung cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Application of CT-based radiomics combined with laboratory tests such as AFP and PIVKA-II in preoperative prediction of pathologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning. Correction: Distinct circle of willis anatomical configurations in healthy preterm born adults: a 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography study. Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study. Value of a combined magnetic resonance-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging dual-sequence radiomics model in predicting the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1