Bayesian learning-based agent negotiation model to support doctor-patient shared decision making.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02839-y
Xin Chen, Yong Liu, Fei-Ping Hong, Ping Lu, Jiang-Tao Lu, Kai-Biao Lin
{"title":"Bayesian learning-based agent negotiation model to support doctor-patient shared decision making.","authors":"Xin Chen, Yong Liu, Fei-Ping Hong, Ping Lu, Jiang-Tao Lu, Kai-Biao Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02839-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Agent negotiation is widely used in e-commerce negotiation, cloud service service-level agreements, and power transactions. However, few studies have adapted alternative negotiation models to negotiation processes between healthcare professionals and patients due to the fuzziness, ethics, and importance of medical decision making.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We propose a Bayesian learning based bilateral fuzzy constraint agent negotiation model (BLFCAN). It support mutually beneficial agreement on treatment between doctors and patients. The proposed model expresses the imprecise preferences and behaviors of doctors and patients through fuzzy constrained agents. To improve negotiation efficiency and social welfare, the Bayesian learning method is adopted in the proposed model to predict the opponent's preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed model achieves 55.4% to 64.2% satisfaction for doctors and 69-74.5% satisfaction for patients in terms of individual satisfaction. In addition, the proposed BLFCAN can increase overall satisfaction by 26.5-29% in fewer rounds, and it can alter the negotiation strategy in a flexible manner for various negotiation scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BLFCAN reduces communication time and cost, helps avoid potential conflicts, and reduces the impact of emotions and biases on decision-making. In addition, the BLFCAN model improves the agreement satisfaction of both parties and the total social welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02839-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Agent negotiation is widely used in e-commerce negotiation, cloud service service-level agreements, and power transactions. However, few studies have adapted alternative negotiation models to negotiation processes between healthcare professionals and patients due to the fuzziness, ethics, and importance of medical decision making.

Method: We propose a Bayesian learning based bilateral fuzzy constraint agent negotiation model (BLFCAN). It support mutually beneficial agreement on treatment between doctors and patients. The proposed model expresses the imprecise preferences and behaviors of doctors and patients through fuzzy constrained agents. To improve negotiation efficiency and social welfare, the Bayesian learning method is adopted in the proposed model to predict the opponent's preference.

Results: The proposed model achieves 55.4% to 64.2% satisfaction for doctors and 69-74.5% satisfaction for patients in terms of individual satisfaction. In addition, the proposed BLFCAN can increase overall satisfaction by 26.5-29% in fewer rounds, and it can alter the negotiation strategy in a flexible manner for various negotiation scenarios.

Conclusions: BLFCAN reduces communication time and cost, helps avoid potential conflicts, and reduces the impact of emotions and biases on decision-making. In addition, the BLFCAN model improves the agreement satisfaction of both parties and the total social welfare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于贝叶斯学习的agent协商模型支持医患共享决策。
背景:Agent协商广泛应用于电子商务谈判、云服务服务水平协议、电力交易等领域。然而,由于医疗决策的模糊性、伦理性和重要性,很少有研究将替代谈判模型应用于医疗专业人员与患者之间的谈判过程。方法:提出一种基于贝叶斯学习的双边模糊约束agent协商模型(BLFCAN)。它支持医患之间达成互利的治疗协议。该模型通过模糊约束agent来表达医生和患者的不精确偏好和行为。为了提高谈判效率和社会福利,该模型采用贝叶斯学习方法来预测对手的偏好。结果:该模型在个体满意度方面,医生满意度为55.4% ~ 64.2%,患者满意度为69 ~ 74.5%。此外,所提出的BLFCAN可以在更少的回合内将整体满意度提高26.5-29%,并且可以灵活地改变谈判策略以适应各种谈判场景。结论:BLFCAN减少了沟通时间和成本,有助于避免潜在冲突,减少了情绪和偏见对决策的影响。此外,BLFCAN模型提高了交易双方的协议满意度和社会总福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Ethical, legal, and social issues of AI use in emergency healthcare: a scoping review. Natural language processing for geriatric syndromes: a systematic review of methods, applications, and challenges. Patient decision aid-supported shared decision making and short-term decision-making outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational comparative study. Accuracy of large language model transcription of simulated physician-patient verbal interactions. Understanding how a tap on/tap off system supports clinical work in an emergency department: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1