Current challenges and future opportunities in on-scene prehospital triage of traumatic brain injury patients: A qualitative study in the UK

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112203
Naif Alqurashi , Steve Bell , Adnan Alzahrani , Fiona Lecky , Christopher Wibberley , Richard Body
{"title":"Current challenges and future opportunities in on-scene prehospital triage of traumatic brain injury patients: A qualitative study in the UK","authors":"Naif Alqurashi ,&nbsp;Steve Bell ,&nbsp;Adnan Alzahrani ,&nbsp;Fiona Lecky ,&nbsp;Christopher Wibberley ,&nbsp;Richard Body","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents significant challenges in prehospital care, particularly during on-scene triage, where accurate decision-making is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study, part of a mixed-methods project, aims to explore these challenges and identify gaps in current on-scene triage practices. Additionally, it seeks to understand paramedics’ perspectives on potential diagnostic tools such as brain biomarkers, near-infrared spectroscopy, and decision aids.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved conducting semi-structured interviews by video conference, including interviews with paramedics of various experience levels who were recruited from UK ambulance trusts. The interviews were guided by a predeveloped and piloted topic guide. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between June and December 2022, twenty participants (15 males and 5 females) with 4 to 24 years of experience were interviewed. Four key themes were identified. Theme 1, “Challenges in TBI Recognition,” highlighted difficulties in identifying non-obvious TBI, especially in older adults or patients with comorbidities, and differentiating TBI from other conditions. Theme 2, \"Need for Specific Triage and Diagnostic Tools,\" emphasised paramedics' need for a simple, evidence-based head injury-specific triage tool, as they felt that current tools lack the necessary specificity. Participants also highlighted the potential of new diagnostic technologies to improve decision-making. Theme 3, “Need for Evidence to Support Diagnostic Tools,” stressed the importance of clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and cost before implementing new diagnostic technologies. Theme 4, “Implementation Requires Planning and Training,” highlighted the need for effective implementation strategies, as well as adequate and ongoing training to ensure proficiency and proper use in the prehospital setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides critical insights into the complexities of on-scene prehospital triage for patients with suspected TBI. Key recommendations include developing specific triage tools, exploring advanced technologies to support on-scene decision-making, enhancing paramedic training on TBI recognition, and addressing both barriers and facilitators to the implementation of new diagnostic technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 5","pages":"Article 112203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents significant challenges in prehospital care, particularly during on-scene triage, where accurate decision-making is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study, part of a mixed-methods project, aims to explore these challenges and identify gaps in current on-scene triage practices. Additionally, it seeks to understand paramedics’ perspectives on potential diagnostic tools such as brain biomarkers, near-infrared spectroscopy, and decision aids.

Methods

This study involved conducting semi-structured interviews by video conference, including interviews with paramedics of various experience levels who were recruited from UK ambulance trusts. The interviews were guided by a predeveloped and piloted topic guide. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Between June and December 2022, twenty participants (15 males and 5 females) with 4 to 24 years of experience were interviewed. Four key themes were identified. Theme 1, “Challenges in TBI Recognition,” highlighted difficulties in identifying non-obvious TBI, especially in older adults or patients with comorbidities, and differentiating TBI from other conditions. Theme 2, "Need for Specific Triage and Diagnostic Tools," emphasised paramedics' need for a simple, evidence-based head injury-specific triage tool, as they felt that current tools lack the necessary specificity. Participants also highlighted the potential of new diagnostic technologies to improve decision-making. Theme 3, “Need for Evidence to Support Diagnostic Tools,” stressed the importance of clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and cost before implementing new diagnostic technologies. Theme 4, “Implementation Requires Planning and Training,” highlighted the need for effective implementation strategies, as well as adequate and ongoing training to ensure proficiency and proper use in the prehospital setting.

Conclusions

This study provides critical insights into the complexities of on-scene prehospital triage for patients with suspected TBI. Key recommendations include developing specific triage tools, exploring advanced technologies to support on-scene decision-making, enhancing paramedic training on TBI recognition, and addressing both barriers and facilitators to the implementation of new diagnostic technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前的挑战和未来的机会在现场院前分诊的创伤性脑损伤患者:在英国的定性研究。
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)在院前护理中提出了重大挑战,特别是在现场分诊过程中,准确的决策对改善患者预后至关重要。本研究是混合方法项目的一部分,旨在探索这些挑战,并确定当前现场分诊实践中的差距。此外,它还试图了解护理人员对潜在诊断工具的看法,如大脑生物标志物、近红外光谱和决策辅助工具。方法:本研究包括通过视频会议进行半结构化访谈,包括对从英国救护车信托机构招募的不同经验水平的护理人员的访谈。访谈以预先编制的试点主题指南为指导。访谈录音、转录,并使用专题分析方法进行分析。结果:在2022年6月至12月期间,对20名具有4至24年工作经验的参与者(15名男性和5名女性)进行了访谈。确定了四个关键主题。主题1“TBI识别中的挑战”强调了识别非明显TBI的困难,特别是在老年人或有合并症的患者中,以及将TBI与其他疾病区分开来。主题2“对特定分类和诊断工具的需求”强调护理人员需要一种简单的、基于证据的针对头部损伤的分类工具,因为他们认为目前的工具缺乏必要的特异性。与会者还强调了新的诊断技术在改进决策方面的潜力。主题3“需要证据来支持诊断工具”强调了在实施新的诊断技术之前临床有效性、可行性和成本的重要性。主题4,“实施需要规划和培训”,强调需要有效的实施战略,以及充分和持续的培训,以确保在院前环境中熟练和正确使用。结论:本研究对疑似脑外伤患者院前现场分诊的复杂性提供了重要的见解。主要建议包括开发特定的分类工具,探索支持现场决策的先进技术,加强对创伤性脑损伤识别的护理人员培训,以及解决实施新诊断技术的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Ergonomic risks in healthcare workers in acute care; the POSTURE framework Epidemiology of injury-related bloodstream infections in Queensland, Australia: a population-based data linkage study Is there still a role for percutaneous pinning of displaced distal radial fractures when compared to volar locking plate fixation? Should vancomycin powder be used in all ORIF wounds at closure of the case to prevent infections? Effectiveness and safety of endovascular therapy in patients with traumatic vertebral artery injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1