Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod
{"title":"Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand","authors":"Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113235"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.