Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235
Yuan Liu , Chengyuan Wang , Bingxin Han , Zian Liu , Tongpeng Wang , Zhenglin Tian , Longxin Ding , Xuegang Mao , Viktor Karminovd , Sergey Chumachenkod
{"title":"Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand","authors":"Yuan Liu ,&nbsp;Chengyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Bingxin Han ,&nbsp;Zian Liu ,&nbsp;Tongpeng Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenglin Tian ,&nbsp;Longxin Ding ,&nbsp;Xuegang Mao ,&nbsp;Viktor Karminovd ,&nbsp;Sergey Chumachenkod","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 113235"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Temporal analyses of global suitability distribution for fall armyworm based on Multiple factors Linking the life stages of fish into a habitat-ecological flow assessment scheme under climate change and human activities Spatial-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of ecosystem health in Three-River-Source national Park Changes in sediment connectivity and its impact on sediment transport in a typical watershed of Southern Jiangxi Province, China Exploring the decline in health index of the Qarhan salt lake region in Qinghai Province, China: A 40-year assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1