A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.115707
Jinghua Sun , Yixin Liu , Josef Kainz
{"title":"A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation","authors":"Jinghua Sun ,&nbsp;Yixin Liu ,&nbsp;Josef Kainz","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115707"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25004207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of La2FeO4-rGO nanocomposite electrode material for symmetric and asymmetric supercapacitor State of charge (SOC) estimation in electric vehicle (EV) battery management systems using ensemble methods and neural networks An eco-friendly and biodegradable chitosan fiber-based separator with ion transport modulation towards highly reversible Zn metal anodes Study on heat transfer characteristics of directly buried casing energy storage body backfilled with phase change material γ-Graphdiyne decorated with Y and Zr: A DFT study on hydrogen storage and material properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1