Study on heat transfer characteristics of directly buried casing energy storage body backfilled with phase change material

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.115857
Jianjun Zhang, Haitao Wang, Zude Cheng, Siqi Li
{"title":"Study on heat transfer characteristics of directly buried casing energy storage body backfilled with phase change material","authors":"Jianjun Zhang,&nbsp;Haitao Wang,&nbsp;Zude Cheng,&nbsp;Siqi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage (STES) effectively utilizes solar energy to perform “peak shaving and valley filling” in the energy supply. Borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) is one of the most important solutions for STES due to its low initial cost, adaptability, and eco-friendliness. This study analyzes the effects of borehole spacing, depth, number of boreholes, and energy storage body type on the performance of BTES when backfilled with different volume fractions of PCM. The results show that an optimal borehole spacing exists for the BTES to reach the highest energy storage efficiency, which reaches 77.17 % at a spacing of 4 m. Increasing the depth and number of boreholes can significantly improve the heat storage capacity and heat extraction capacity of BTES. Increasing the depth of boreholes from 200 m to 400 m increases the heat storage capacity by 80.88 % and the heat extraction capacity by 81.47 %; increasing the number of boreholes from 9 to 25 increases the heat storage capacity by 167.75 % and the heat extraction capacity by 167.98 %. For the sphere, hexagonal prism, and cuboid as energy storage bodies, their energy storage efficiencies are 59.97 %, 63.97 %, and 59.3 % respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding exergy efficiencies are 48.74 %, 46.7 %, and 47.43 % respectively. This indicates that the sphere has the largest exergy efficiency, whereas the hexagonal prism, among these three, has the largest energy storage efficiency but the smallest exergy efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115857"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25005705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage (STES) effectively utilizes solar energy to perform “peak shaving and valley filling” in the energy supply. Borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) is one of the most important solutions for STES due to its low initial cost, adaptability, and eco-friendliness. This study analyzes the effects of borehole spacing, depth, number of boreholes, and energy storage body type on the performance of BTES when backfilled with different volume fractions of PCM. The results show that an optimal borehole spacing exists for the BTES to reach the highest energy storage efficiency, which reaches 77.17 % at a spacing of 4 m. Increasing the depth and number of boreholes can significantly improve the heat storage capacity and heat extraction capacity of BTES. Increasing the depth of boreholes from 200 m to 400 m increases the heat storage capacity by 80.88 % and the heat extraction capacity by 81.47 %; increasing the number of boreholes from 9 to 25 increases the heat storage capacity by 167.75 % and the heat extraction capacity by 167.98 %. For the sphere, hexagonal prism, and cuboid as energy storage bodies, their energy storage efficiencies are 59.97 %, 63.97 %, and 59.3 % respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding exergy efficiencies are 48.74 %, 46.7 %, and 47.43 % respectively. This indicates that the sphere has the largest exergy efficiency, whereas the hexagonal prism, among these three, has the largest energy storage efficiency but the smallest exergy efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Forecasts for full decarbonization of the economy in off-grid systems with high end-use consumption rates through combined electricity and hydrogen deployment, the Canary Islands in 2040 State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using PSO optimized random forest algorithm and performance analysis Core-shell transition metal disulfide grafted carbon matrix composite as an anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries Battery pack capacity estimation based on improved cooperative co-evolutionary strategy and LightGBM hybrid models using indirect health features Stochastic power management strategy for an autonomous wind energy conversion system with battery storage under random load consumption using Markov process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1