State of charge (SOC) estimation in electric vehicle (EV) battery management systems using ensemble methods and neural networks

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2025-04-10 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.115833
Edward Ositadinma Ofoegbu
{"title":"State of charge (SOC) estimation in electric vehicle (EV) battery management systems using ensemble methods and neural networks","authors":"Edward Ositadinma Ofoegbu","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.115833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Battery management systems (BMS) are critical in ensuring the performance, reliability, and safety of battery systems through accurate estimation of the State of Charge (SOC) of batteries. As on-board SOC estimation, together with other functionalities by the BMS can result in its high design complexity, high cost, and high energy consumption, this study explores a data-driven estimation of a Lithium battery state of charge (SOC) while discharging, using simple linear regression, ensemble methods, and neural networks respectively to ensure an accurate low time complexity solution as compared to existing methods. A known dataset of 835,248 records from Li [NiMnCo]O2 (H-NMC)/Graphite + SiO battery was used to train and test each model to determine the best fit. This study determined that neural networks are the models of choice for SOC prediction instead of linear and ensemble regression. Still, also the wide tri-layered feed-forward neural network proposed in this study showed great results by having a maximum error percentage of less than 1 %, and a mean squared error (MSE) of 1e-08, which is similar to or better than what is obtainable in other more complex deep neural network variants such as the Gated recurrent unit recurrent neural network (GRU-RNN), with an MSE of 1e-06 and similar load classifying neural network models with an error percentage of 3.8 %. The FFNN proposed in this study also has the advantage of having lower technical and time complexity computational costs required for active fault estimation in thin client devices such as a BMS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 115833"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25005468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery management systems (BMS) are critical in ensuring the performance, reliability, and safety of battery systems through accurate estimation of the State of Charge (SOC) of batteries. As on-board SOC estimation, together with other functionalities by the BMS can result in its high design complexity, high cost, and high energy consumption, this study explores a data-driven estimation of a Lithium battery state of charge (SOC) while discharging, using simple linear regression, ensemble methods, and neural networks respectively to ensure an accurate low time complexity solution as compared to existing methods. A known dataset of 835,248 records from Li [NiMnCo]O2 (H-NMC)/Graphite + SiO battery was used to train and test each model to determine the best fit. This study determined that neural networks are the models of choice for SOC prediction instead of linear and ensemble regression. Still, also the wide tri-layered feed-forward neural network proposed in this study showed great results by having a maximum error percentage of less than 1 %, and a mean squared error (MSE) of 1e-08, which is similar to or better than what is obtainable in other more complex deep neural network variants such as the Gated recurrent unit recurrent neural network (GRU-RNN), with an MSE of 1e-06 and similar load classifying neural network models with an error percentage of 3.8 %. The FFNN proposed in this study also has the advantage of having lower technical and time complexity computational costs required for active fault estimation in thin client devices such as a BMS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于集成方法和神经网络的电动汽车电池管理系统荷电状态估计
电池管理系统(Battery management system, BMS)通过对电池的荷电状态(State of Charge, SOC)进行准确估计,是确保电池系统性能、可靠性和安全性的关键。由于车载电池荷电状态估计以及BMS的其他功能可能导致其高设计复杂性、高成本和高能耗,本研究探索了一种数据驱动的锂电池放电状态估计,分别使用简单的线性回归、集成方法和神经网络,以确保与现有方法相比,获得准确的低时间复杂度解决方案。使用Li [NiMnCo]O2 (H-NMC)/石墨+ SiO电池的835,248条记录的已知数据集对每个模型进行训练和测试,以确定最佳拟合。本研究确定了神经网络是代替线性和集合回归预测的理想模型。仍,也宽tri-layered前馈神经网络提出了研究显示的结果通过比例最大误差小于1%,和均方误差(MSE) 1 e-08,比什么是类似或更好的获得在其他更复杂的深层神经网络变异等封闭的复发性单元递归神经网络(GRU-RNN), 1 e-06的MSE和类似的负载分类神经网络模型与一个错误的比例3.8%。本研究中提出的FFNN还具有在瘦客户端设备(如BMS)中进行主动故障估计所需的较低技术和时间复杂度计算成本的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Al-MoS2/rGO nanoflowers with enlarged interlayer spacing and boosted conductivity as cathode for high-capacity aqueous zinc-ion batteries Modeling renewable power systems on islands: Can renewables and energy storage fully replace fossil-fired power plants? Comparative analysis of series, parallel, and series-parallel hybrid electric vehicle architectures: A standardized modeling and evaluation approach Influence of structural parameters on mixed flow process and steam condensation in a liquid–gas two-phase ejector under non-condensable gas conditions Electromagnetic transient simulation of EV fast charging on distribution networks: Comparative evaluation with PV integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1