AAPM WGWMRSC Report 420: chapter climate check: Mixed methods analysis of survey responses

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14600
Ashley J. Cetnar, Ghada Aldosary, Meghan C. Koo, Holly Lincoln, Angélica Pérez-Andújar, Surendra Prajapati, Samantha J. Simiele, Kristi R. G. Hendrickson
{"title":"AAPM WGWMRSC Report 420: chapter climate check: Mixed methods analysis of survey responses","authors":"Ashley J. Cetnar,&nbsp;Ghada Aldosary,&nbsp;Meghan C. Koo,&nbsp;Holly Lincoln,&nbsp;Angélica Pérez-Andújar,&nbsp;Surendra Prajapati,&nbsp;Samantha J. Simiele,&nbsp;Kristi R. G. Hendrickson","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) recently shared results and recommendations from its first Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Climate Survey, which was designed to assess the climate at the workplace, the AAPM organization, and the AAPM regional chapter level. This work further explores the status of EDI at the regional chapter level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>AAPM's EDI Survey was distributed to 5500 members and had a response rate of 25%. In the survey, three open-ended comment boxes were provided for feedback, including one for regional AAPM members. Sixty-four percent of respondents indicated they were part of a regional chapter, and 6% provided written responses to the regional chapter question. Responses were analyzed using a mixed methods approach with an exploratory sequential design. Two phases were conducted; the first relied on a Grounded Theory quantitative systemic approach, and the second applied qualitative analysis. Chapter member demographic data were collected to support findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Survey respondents provided open comments and feedback on their regional chapter's climate. Data are summarized as five themes: positive experiences, negative experiences, challenges within chapters, diversity and inclusion, and changes observed. Experiences of regional chapters were rated positively by 75% of respondents. Respondents found their chapters were welcoming, and some noted their great chapter leadership. A number of incidents of sexual harassment, bullying, and discrimination incidences were also shared. Other respondents observed exclusion based on their gender, race, highest degree, and medical physics specialty. Chapter leadership data aligned with these claims, with most leaders to-date being white males, doctoral degree holders, and/or specializing in radiation therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AAPM chapters provide rewarding professional opportunities. This study has highlighted positive and negative experiences reported by its members. The major themes identified can guide chapter leaders to continue to cultivate welcoming communities for regional AAPM members.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14600","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) recently shared results and recommendations from its first Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Climate Survey, which was designed to assess the climate at the workplace, the AAPM organization, and the AAPM regional chapter level. This work further explores the status of EDI at the regional chapter level.

Methods

AAPM's EDI Survey was distributed to 5500 members and had a response rate of 25%. In the survey, three open-ended comment boxes were provided for feedback, including one for regional AAPM members. Sixty-four percent of respondents indicated they were part of a regional chapter, and 6% provided written responses to the regional chapter question. Responses were analyzed using a mixed methods approach with an exploratory sequential design. Two phases were conducted; the first relied on a Grounded Theory quantitative systemic approach, and the second applied qualitative analysis. Chapter member demographic data were collected to support findings.

Results

Survey respondents provided open comments and feedback on their regional chapter's climate. Data are summarized as five themes: positive experiences, negative experiences, challenges within chapters, diversity and inclusion, and changes observed. Experiences of regional chapters were rated positively by 75% of respondents. Respondents found their chapters were welcoming, and some noted their great chapter leadership. A number of incidents of sexual harassment, bullying, and discrimination incidences were also shared. Other respondents observed exclusion based on their gender, race, highest degree, and medical physics specialty. Chapter leadership data aligned with these claims, with most leaders to-date being white males, doctoral degree holders, and/or specializing in radiation therapy.

Conclusion

AAPM chapters provide rewarding professional opportunities. This study has highlighted positive and negative experiences reported by its members. The major themes identified can guide chapter leaders to continue to cultivate welcoming communities for regional AAPM members.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)分会气候检查:调查反应的混合方法分析。
简介:美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)最近分享了其首次公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)气候调查的结果和建议,该调查旨在评估工作场所、AAPM组织和AAPM区域分会层面的气候。这项工作进一步探讨了EDI在区域分会一级的地位。方法:对5500名会员进行EDI问卷调查,回复率为25%。在调查中,提供了三个开放式评论框以供反馈,其中一个是针对AAPM地区成员的。64%的受访者表示他们是地区分会的成员,6%的受访者对地区分会的问题提供了书面答复。采用探索性顺序设计的混合方法对响应进行分析。进行了两个阶段的研究;前者依赖于扎根理论的定量系统方法,后者应用定性分析。收集了分会成员的人口统计数据以支持调查结果。结果:调查对象对其所在地区分会的气候提供了公开的评论和反馈。数据总结为五个主题:积极的经验,消极的经验,章节内的挑战,多样性和包容性,以及观察到的变化。75%的受访者对地区分会的经验给予积极评价。受访者认为他们的分会很受欢迎,有些人还提到了他们出色的分会领导能力。还分享了一些性骚扰、欺凌和歧视事件。其他应答者则因其性别、种族、最高学历和医学物理专业而受到排斥。分会的领导数据与这些说法一致,迄今为止,大多数领导都是白人男性,博士学位持有者,和/或专门从事放射治疗。结论:AAPM分会提供了有益的专业机会。这项研究突出了其成员报告的积极和消极经验。确定的主要主题可以指导分会领导人继续为区域AAPM成员培养欢迎社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Modeling dose to normal brain following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a single brain metastasis. Four-year experience with an in-house treatment management platform to streamline departmental operations in radiation oncology. Comparative evaluation of 4DCT and 4DCBCT for motion and volume measurement accuracy in a dynamic phantom. Active bone marrow dose reconstruction in a large-scale cohort study of cancer patients treated with photon radiotherapy. Dysphagia optimized knowledge-based planning for head and neck cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1