Targeting the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for Pain Relief in Patients With Acute or Chronic Knee Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/os.14349
Qiangqiang Li, Aikeremu Aierken, Jianghui Qin, Dongyang Chen, Qing Jiang
{"title":"Targeting the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for Pain Relief in Patients With Acute or Chronic Knee Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.","authors":"Qiangqiang Li, Aikeremu Aierken, Jianghui Qin, Dongyang Chen, Qing Jiang","doi":"10.1111/os.14349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blocking the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) can provide analgesic benefits for patients with postoperative acute pain or chronic pain, with minimal adverse effects. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and potential adverse events associated with IPBSN block in patients suffering from acute or chronic knee pain. We conducted a systematic review across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies according to predefined selection criteria. The study quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, while cohort studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. The primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and opioid consumption following the nerve block. A total of eight studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 613 subjects with 276 participants in the control group and 337 participants in the IPBSN block group. The level of evidence was rated high for the RCTs and moderate for the cohort studies. The nerve block was administrated either through the injection of local anesthetic or percutaneous cryoneurolysis targeting the IPBSN. The results indicated that the IPBSN block significantly improved pain relief and reduced opioid consumption in patients with acute postoperative or chronic pain, with no significant difference in the rate of adverse events relating to the procedures or device. The IPBSN block holds promise for improving pain relief and reducing opioid consumption. However, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blocking the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) can provide analgesic benefits for patients with postoperative acute pain or chronic pain, with minimal adverse effects. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and potential adverse events associated with IPBSN block in patients suffering from acute or chronic knee pain. We conducted a systematic review across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies according to predefined selection criteria. The study quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, while cohort studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. The primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and opioid consumption following the nerve block. A total of eight studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 613 subjects with 276 participants in the control group and 337 participants in the IPBSN block group. The level of evidence was rated high for the RCTs and moderate for the cohort studies. The nerve block was administrated either through the injection of local anesthetic or percutaneous cryoneurolysis targeting the IPBSN. The results indicated that the IPBSN block significantly improved pain relief and reduced opioid consumption in patients with acute postoperative or chronic pain, with no significant difference in the rate of adverse events relating to the procedures or device. The IPBSN block holds promise for improving pain relief and reducing opioid consumption. However, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Targeting the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for Pain Relief in Patients With Acute or Chronic Knee Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies. Opportunistic Screening for Local Osteoporosis of the Proximal Humerus on the Basis of Hounsfield Units: A Study of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears. Diagnostic Efficiency of MRI in Child and Adolescent Lateral Discoid Meniscus. Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Posterolateral Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1