Using Bayesian evidence synthesis to quantify uncertainty in population trends in smoking behaviour.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1177/09622802241310326
Stephen Wade, Peter Sarich, Pavla Vaneckova, Silvia Behar-Harpaz, Preston J Ngo, Paul B Grogan, Sonya Cressman, Coral E Gartner, John M Murray, Tony Blakely, Emily Banks, Martin C Tammemagi, Karen Canfell, Marianne F Weber, Michael Caruana
{"title":"Using Bayesian evidence synthesis to quantify uncertainty in population trends in smoking behaviour.","authors":"Stephen Wade, Peter Sarich, Pavla Vaneckova, Silvia Behar-Harpaz, Preston J Ngo, Paul B Grogan, Sonya Cressman, Coral E Gartner, John M Murray, Tony Blakely, Emily Banks, Martin C Tammemagi, Karen Canfell, Marianne F Weber, Michael Caruana","doi":"10.1177/09622802241310326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation models of smoking behaviour provide vital forecasts of exposure to inform policy targets, estimates of the burden of disease, and impacts of tobacco control interventions. A key element of useful model-based forecasts is a clear picture of uncertainty due to the data used to inform the model, however, assessment of this parameter uncertainty is incomplete in almost all tobacco control models. As a remedy, we demonstrate a Bayesian approach to model calibration that quantifies parameter uncertainty. With a model calibrated to Australian data, we observed that the smoking cessation rate in Australia has increased with calendar year since the late 20th century, and in 2016 people who smoked would quit at a rate of 4.7 quit-events per 100 person-years (90% equal-tailed interval (ETI): 4.5-4.9). We found that those who quit smoking before age 30 years switched to reporting that they never smoked at a rate of approximately 2% annually (90% ETI: 1.9-2.2%). The Bayesian approach demonstrated here can be used as a blueprint to model other population behaviours that are challenging to measure directly, and to provide a clearer picture of uncertainty to decision-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"545-560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241310326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation models of smoking behaviour provide vital forecasts of exposure to inform policy targets, estimates of the burden of disease, and impacts of tobacco control interventions. A key element of useful model-based forecasts is a clear picture of uncertainty due to the data used to inform the model, however, assessment of this parameter uncertainty is incomplete in almost all tobacco control models. As a remedy, we demonstrate a Bayesian approach to model calibration that quantifies parameter uncertainty. With a model calibrated to Australian data, we observed that the smoking cessation rate in Australia has increased with calendar year since the late 20th century, and in 2016 people who smoked would quit at a rate of 4.7 quit-events per 100 person-years (90% equal-tailed interval (ETI): 4.5-4.9). We found that those who quit smoking before age 30 years switched to reporting that they never smoked at a rate of approximately 2% annually (90% ETI: 1.9-2.2%). The Bayesian approach demonstrated here can be used as a blueprint to model other population behaviours that are challenging to measure directly, and to provide a clearer picture of uncertainty to decision-makers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用贝叶斯证据综合法量化人群吸烟行为趋势的不确定性。
吸烟行为模拟模型提供了重要的接触预测,为政策目标、疾病负担估计和烟草控制干预措施的影响提供信息。有用的基于模型的预测的一个关键要素是由于用于告知模型的数据而对不确定性有一个清晰的认识,然而,在几乎所有烟草控制模型中,对这种参数不确定性的评估都是不完整的。作为补救措施,我们展示了贝叶斯方法模型校准量化参数不确定性。通过对澳大利亚数据进行校准的模型,我们观察到,自20世纪末以来,澳大利亚的戒烟率逐年上升,2016年,吸烟者的戒烟率为每100人年4.7次戒烟事件(90%等尾间隔(ETI): 4.5-4.9)。我们发现,那些在30岁之前戒烟的人以每年约2%的比率(90% ETI: 1.9-2.2%)转向报告他们从不吸烟。这里展示的贝叶斯方法可以作为一个蓝图,用来为其他难以直接测量的人口行为建模,并为决策者提供更清晰的不确定性图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
CiFGNA: Comprehensive information-based functional gene network analysis. Restricted mean survival time in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Improving variance estimation of the intervention effect from the pseudo-values regression. Grouped multi-trajectory modeling using finite mixtures of multivariate contaminated normal linear mixed model. Joint modeling of composite quantile regression for multiple ordinal longitudinal data with its applications to a dementia dataset. A two-stage joint modeling approach for multiple longitudinal markers and time-to-event data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1